Of course - if you don't plan to push this DISI into "uncontrolled land",
you can use the previous solution as well. I.e., if you never rely on docId
to know whether to start the iteration, and don't pass this DISI to Lucene
somehow etc., there's no need to use act or "adhere completely" to the API
Agreed - that looks like the optimal solution.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> OK, that makes sense: So the example of Yonik should be interpreted like
> this (I think this is the optimal solution as it does not use an additional
> i
PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org; yo...@lucidimagination.com
Subject: Re: DISI semantics
Uwe / Yonik, DISI's class javadoc states this:
"Implementations of this class are expected to consider {...@link
Integer#MAX_VALUE} as an invalid value."
Therefore "last" cannot
Uwe / Yonik, DISI's class javadoc states this:
"Implementations of this class are expected to consider {...@link
Integer#MAX_VALUE} as an invalid value."
Therefore "last" cannot be set to MAX_VAL in the above example, if it wants
to be a DISI at least.
Phew ... that was a long issue. I was able
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Michael
McCandless wrote:
> I believe we debated allowing the DISI to return any docID less than
> its first real docID, not only -1, as you've done here, but I think
> Shai found something wrong with that IIRC... but I can't find this
> discussion. Shai do you rem
I believe we debated allowing the DISI to return any docID less than
its first real docID, not only -1, as you've done here, but I think
Shai found something wrong with that IIRC... but I can't find this
discussion. Shai do you remember / can you find this past discussion
/ am I just hallucinating
> > This Impl should do it. The problem is, if (last==Integer.MAX_VALUE),
> then
> > it would break because of overflow.
>
> That part is OK... I'm more talking about the Javadoc for docID()
> which states that it returns
>* -1 or {...@link #NO_MORE_DOCS} if {...@link #nextDoc()} or
>* {..
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> This Impl should do it. The problem is, if (last==Integer.MAX_VALUE), then
> it would break because of overflow.
That part is OK... I'm more talking about the Javadoc for docID()
which states that it returns
* -1 or {...@link #NO_MORE_DOCS
Edit:
This Impl should do it. The problem is, if lucene would call nextDoc() if
doc is already Integer.MAX_VALUE (what it could do according to docs), then
it would break because of overflow.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
This Impl should do it. The problem is, if (last==Integer.MAX_VALUE), then
it would break because of overflow.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com]
10 matches
Mail list logo
