OK, done.
Thanks for finding this Steve!
Mike
On Jan 11, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
Sure, go ahead!
Michael McCandless wrote:
OK, phew :)
I'll commit to trunk.
Michael, is it OK to commit to 2.3 too?
Mike
On Jan 11, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
Hi Mike,
I coul
Sure, go ahead!
Michael McCandless wrote:
>
> OK, phew :)
>
> I'll commit to trunk.
>
> Michael, is it OK to commit to 2.3 too?
>
> Mike
>
> On Jan 11, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I couldn't get the patch to apply (word wrapping/line
>> endings/whatever), so I
OK, phew :)
I'll commit to trunk.
Michael, is it OK to commit to 2.3 too?
Mike
On Jan 11, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
Hi Mike,
I couldn't get the patch to apply (word wrapping/line endings/
whatever), so I just manually pasted in the added line after
deleting the correspondin
Hi Mike,
I couldn't get the patch to apply (word wrapping/line endings/whatever), so I
just manually pasted in the added line after deleting the corresponding removed
line.
With the patched version, I got 0 failures out of 20 runs.
After I reverted back to the original version, I got 10 failur
Alas, so far I cannot repro this.
But I did see one off-by-one error in an assert the test. Steve,
could you try applying this patch and see if the failure still
happens? Thanks:
Index: src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestDeletionPolicy.java
=
Hmm ... I'll try to repro this and track it down.
Mike
Steven A Rowe wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 01/11/2008 at 3:34 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
I just uploaded Lucene 2.3 release candidate 2 to
http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc2.
Please switch to RC2 and keep testing!
(
Hi Michael,
On 01/11/2008 at 3:34 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
> I just uploaded Lucene 2.3 release candidate 2 to
> http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc2.
>
> Please switch to RC2 and keep testing!
(The report below is not about binary release testing, but rather running the
Good idea! I just sent a mail to java-user.
-Michael
Michael McCandless wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> Do you think we should include java-user in this pre-release testing?
>
> It seems like it can only help us to ferret out issues, and, keeps our
> users informed/excited about an upcoming release?
>
Michael,
Do you think we should include java-user in this pre-release testing?
It seems like it can only help us to ferret out issues, and, keeps
our users informed/excited about an upcoming release?
Mike
Michael Busch wrote:
Hi all,
I just uploaded Lucene 2.3 release candidate 2 to
htt
