On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
What should the next version of Solr be?
Options:
- have a Solr 1.5 with a lucene 2.9.x
- have a Solr 1.5 with a lucene 3.x, with weaker back compat given all
of the removed lucene deprecations from 2.9-3.0
-
:31 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 1.5 or 2.0?
Oops... of course I meant to post this in solr-dev.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
What should the next version of Solr
://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 3:31 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 1.5 or 2.0?
Oops... of course I meant to post this in solr-dev
I would love to set goals that are ~3 months out so that we don't have
another 1 year release cycle. For a 2.0 release where we could have
more back-compatibly flexibility, i would love to see some work that
may be too ambitious... In particular, the config spaghetti needs
some
Ryan McKinley wrote:
I would love to set goals that are ~3 months out so that we don't have
another 1 year release cycle. For a 2.0 release where we could have
more back-compatibly flexibility, i would love to see some work that
may be too ambitious... In particular, the config spaghetti
On Nov 19, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Ryan McKinley wrote:
I would love to set goals that are ~3 months out so that we don't
have
another 1 year release cycle. For a 2.0 release where we could have
more back-compatibly flexibility, i would love to see some work that
may be too
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 19, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Ryan McKinley wrote:
I would love to set goals that are ~3 months out so that we don't have
another 1 year release cycle. For a 2.0 release where we could have
more
What should the next version of Solr be?
Options:
- have a Solr 1.5 with a lucene 2.9.x
- have a Solr 1.5 with a lucene 3.x, with weaker back compat given all
of the removed lucene deprecations from 2.9-3.0
- have a Solr 2.0 with a lucene 3.x
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
