[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1496) Move solr NumberUtils to lucene

2009-06-11 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
bit values, and coming into core, does Lucene need Solr's NumberUtils? Are there compelling things that Solr's NumberUtils do over TrieUtil? Move solr NumberUtils to lucene --- Key: LUCENE-1496 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1496) Move solr NumberUtils to lucene

2009-06-11 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
and so don't touch the UTF-8 encoding (it is simply ASCII-only). Move solr NumberUtils to lucene --- Key: LUCENE-1496 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1496 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Task

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1496) Move solr NumberUtils to lucene

2009-06-11 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
needs TrieUtils... Move solr NumberUtils to lucene --- Key: LUCENE-1496 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1496 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Task Reporter: Ryan McKinley

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1496) Move solr NumberUtils to lucene

2009-03-18 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
do we need/want to fold in from Solr's NumberUtils? Move solr NumberUtils to lucene --- Key: LUCENE-1496 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1496 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Task

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1496) Move solr NumberUtils to lucene

2008-12-28 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
to unify TrieUtils and NumberUtils. Maybe TrieRangeQuery will make it into the core, when flexible indexing is available. So my questions: Is anybody interested in TrieUtils also support 32bit? Why not unify NumberUtils and TrieUtils? Any ideas? Move solr NumberUtils to lucene

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1496) Move solr NumberUtils to lucene

2008-12-27 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
with the next major version, too. Move solr NumberUtils to lucene --- Key: LUCENE-1496 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1496 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Task Reporter: Ryan

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1496) Move solr NumberUtils to lucene

2008-12-27 Thread Ryan McKinley (JIRA)
be moved to a lucene NumberUtils? API wise, if i were looking for ways to encode numbers, i doubt i would look at TrieUtils.java what about the non-long/double functions in NumberUtils? Move solr NumberUtils to lucene --- Key: LUCENE-1496

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1496) Move solr NumberUtils to lucene

2008-12-19 Thread Ryan McKinley (JIRA)
Move solr NumberUtils to lucene --- Key: LUCENE-1496 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1496 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Task Reporter: Ryan McKinley Priority

Re: solr NumberUtils to lucene?

2008-12-17 Thread patrick o'leary
It would be great to get it consistent I cherry picked when someone pointed it out to me Erik Hatcher wrote: My thoughts... bring over any simple functions like these are that are generally useful. At a quick glance, the functions in Solr's NumberUtils are generally useful and fit well in

solr NumberUtils to lucene?

2008-12-16 Thread Ryan McKinley
I posted this same question for the same reasons a while back... http://markmail.org/message/mji7jnpa5xjfflmw I'm looking at local lucene and trying to figure out how it could go into lucene. As is, locallucene depends on solr since it needs NumberUtils. Any change of heart for moving it

Re: solr NumberUtils to lucene?

2008-12-16 Thread Erik Hatcher
My thoughts... bring over any simple functions like these are that are generally useful.At a quick glance, the functions in Solr's NumberUtils are generally useful and fit well in Lucene's NumberTools. What's the harm? Erik On Dec 16, 2008, at 9:14 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: