[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-991) BoostingTermQuery.explain() bugs

2007-09-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll reassigned LUCENE-991: -- Assignee: Grant Ingersoll > BoostingTermQuery.explain() bugs >

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-991) BoostingTermQuery.explain() bugs

2007-09-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525695 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-991: Hi Peter, Couple comments. #1 makes sense, except the super.score

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-991) BoostingTermQuery.explain() bugs

2007-09-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-991: --- Attachment: TestBoostingTermQuery4.patch OK, I added the setBoost(0) back in, but kept the si

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-991) BoostingTermQuery.explain() bugs

2007-09-07 Thread Peter Keegan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525709 ] Peter Keegan commented on LUCENE-991: - Hi Grant, > TopDocs hits = searcher.search(query, null, 100); > assertT

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-991) BoostingTermQuery.explain() bugs

2007-09-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-991: --- Attachment: TestBoostingTermQuery3.patch OK, I think I see the problem, The issue lies in th

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-991) BoostingTermQuery.explain() bugs

2007-09-07 Thread Peter Keegan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525734 ] Peter Keegan commented on LUCENE-991: - Confirmed - thanks. > BoostingTermQuery.explain() bugs >

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-991) BoostingTermQuery.explain() bugs

2007-09-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-991: --- Attachment: TestBoostingTermQuery2.patch but, I agree, there is something wrong here. Attach

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-847) Factor merge policy out of IndexWriter

2007-09-07 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-847: -- Attachment: LUCENE-847.take5.patch Attached new patch (take5) incorporating Ning's fee

Regarding Lucene & Nutch

2007-09-07 Thread Kunal Wku
Hello Everyone, I am using Lucene & Nutch in my project for searching content in the webpages. For a webpage or any other document, Lucene takes all the words in the page and indexes them and returns the result when searched. Lets say, I have 2 webpages as shown below: Webpage1 -

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-847) Factor merge policy out of IndexWriter

2007-09-07 Thread Doug Cutting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525797 ] Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-847: - Is there any reason not to make ConcurrentMergeScheduler the default too a

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-847) Factor merge policy out of IndexWriter

2007-09-07 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525802 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-847: --- > Is there any reason not to make ConcurrentMergeScheduler the