Hi,
We are currently using Hibernate Search but had some questions
regarding scoring. We are implementing a quicksearchengine in our
webapp but want to customize the scoring a bit.
Let's say, you have a User named Peter, and a search is done on Peter.
The first result should therefore not be a
I am having the same experience as issue LUCENE-4713.
Without modifying the source code myself, how do I overcome this? I am in
the middle of migrating from 3.6 to 4.2 and I am unable to index or search.
From the source code, I see there is a setter for a codec but there's not a
constructor that
Am 11.03.2013 18:22, schrieb Michael McCandless:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Carsten Schnober
schno...@ids-mannheim.de wrote:
Am 11.03.2013 13:38, schrieb Michael McCandless:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Set the rewrite method to e.g.
Hi Carsten,
I would suggest to use my example code with the fake query and custom rewrite.
This does not have the overhead of BooleanQuery and more important: You don't
need to change the *global* and *static* default in BooleanQuery. Otherwise you
could introduce a denial of service case into
Am 12.03.2013 10:39, schrieb Uwe Schindler:
I would suggest to use my example code with the fake query and custom
rewrite. This does not have the overhead of BooleanQuery and more important:
You don't need to change the *global* and *static* default in BooleanQuery.
Otherwise you could
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Ramprakash Ramamoorthy
youngestachie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
In that case, it should be fine. Otherwise you would need to reindex.
Thank you Uwe.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee
Uwe, Just re-iterating so that I am understanding your statement right
without ambiguity. I use standard analyzer for all english and numerals. I
don't have a problem when reading 2.3 migrated indices with 4.1, right?
Sorry, for the doubt again.
YES!
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Uwe, Just re-iterating so that I am understanding your statement right
without ambiguity. I use standard analyzer for all english and numerals.
I
don't have a problem when reading 2.3 migrated indices with 4.1, right?
Sounds like a job for boosting. Document.setBoost() and/or
Field.setBoost(). The former has gone away in lucene 4.x. See the
migration guide.
Or execute 2 searches, restricting the first to the contact docs or
whichever you want to be top of the list.
--
Ian.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:36
QueryParser qp = new QueryParser(Version.whatever, somefield, new
WhateverAnalyzer());
Query q = qp.parse(\The mouse gnawed the clothes of the king of Rome\);
and q should be a PhraseQuery if I've got the quoting right. Some of
those words might be stop words which might cause you problems
Hi,
here's another question involving MultiTermQuerys. My aim is to get a
frequency count for a MultiTermQuery while I don't need to execute the
query. The naive approach would be to create the Query, extract the
terms, and get each term's frequency, approximately as follows:
IndexSearcher
In this case you are not using more search PhraseQuery the type that
existed in previous versions ... I would like to use this PhraseQuery by
having the possibility of bidding I use the property and thus enable
setSlop have more content between words.
So it is not recommended to use more
Hi all, I'm looking to create a TermFreqVector as follows
TermFreqVector[] tfvs = null;
try {
tfvs = indxRead.getTermFreqVectors(docId);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
However, the object tfvs is returning null.
I've debugged it to a class called
Please ignore this, I was using two different indexes, one of which did
not have TermVectors.YES set,
apologies,
Peter
On 03/12/2013 05:49 PM, Peter Lavin wrote:
Hi all, I'm looking to create a TermFreqVector as follows
TermFreqVector[] tfvs = null;
try {
tfvs =
14 matches
Mail list logo
