SSD or in-memory index
Best regards,
Duke
If not now, when? If not me, who?
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> This list is for users of the Lucene Java API, maybe try solr-user instead?
>
> Le lun. 13 févr. 2017 à 21:24, yeshwanth kumar a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi, we have 4 sol
://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 12:30 PM
> > To: Duke DAI
> > Cc: Lucene Users
> > Subject: Re: Hardcoded chec
ss
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Duke DAI wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm customizing Lucene Directory, which extends o.a.l.store.Directory
> based
> > on database files. I do not need checksum again on
Hi all,
I'm customizing Lucene Directory, which extends o.a.l.store.Directory based
on database files. I do not need checksum again on IndexIndex and
IndexOutput.
But in BlockTreeTermsReader constructor, following code open a
hard-coded BufferedChecksumIndexInput to checksum on raw IndexInput. I
How about add line feed for the single line? It seems I have the impression
that line feed is required.
Best regards,
Duke
If not now, when? If not me, who?
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Sigbjørn Lund Olsen <
sigbjorn.lund.ol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As part of my master's thesis I am planning
Seems we are encountering same problem. (thread: bug of
highlighter/SimpleSpanFragmenter,
returned longer fragment than expected?)
When debugging, your fragmenter is SimpleSpanFragmenter? isNewFragment()
returns true due to below logic?
boolean isNewFrag = offsetAtt.endOffset() >= (fragmentSize *
c
Greetings!
Any body has input on this?
Best regards,
Duke
If not now, when? If not me, who?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Duke DAI wrote:
> Hi experts,
>
> I'm trying to reproduce a bug from Lucene side, and found something.
>
> In latest codeline, 5.2.1, I
>From my experience, you must hit some system issue. You should check disk
performance at first, disk queue length on Windows. Or you can enable gc
verbose to know the gc activities in details.
I designed auto upgrade mechanism in application by calling forceMerge(1),
to eradicate hybrid index for
Hi experts,
I'm trying to reproduce a bug from Lucene side, and found something.
In latest codeline, 5.2.1, I modified test
case HighlighterTest.testSimpleQueryTermScorerHighlighter a little to
below, mainly to use SimpleSpanFragmenter to get only one fragment with
length 64.
public void testS
Hi Simon, guys,
I see LUCENE-5038, useCompoundFile stuff had been refactored. Now I think
there are some problems with LogMergePolicy.
Example:
1. setting useCompoundFile as false and no changing NOCFSRatio(1.0 by
default).
2. starting index, new segment will not use compound file even it's small
Hi Stephen,
I have the same scenario with you. I verified with simple pure Lucene test,
same way as Mike mentioned, performance with NumericDocValue is 10x faster
than retrieving stored field.
Hope you can get similar performance measurement.
Best regards,
Duke
If not now, when? If not me, who?
ss queries.
>
> Maybe you can boil down the issue you are seeing into a small test case?
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Duke DAI wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > My scenario, query thread from a
ng for the same doc values.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Duke DAI wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Seems I have the same problem with Lucene45DocValuesFormat, no problem
> with
> > MemoryDocValues
cases.
Do you have any idea about this? Information is enough?
Thanks,
Duke
Best regards,
Duke
If not now, when? If not me, who?
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Duke DAI wrote:
> Hi experts,
>
> I'm upgrading Lucene 4.4 and trying to use DocValues instead of store
> fiel
POM of the project is here
> http://lesimisped.free.fr/servo/pom2.xml. It reuses a project which uses
> Lucene, and the POM is this project is
> http://lesimisped.free.fr/servo/pom.xml.
> With a similar project which uses lucene 2.9 we didn't experienced such an
> issue.
>
> Hope that may
Some share for this topic.
QueryParser queryParser = new QueryParser(Version.LUCENE_30, "my_field",
new StandardAnalyzer(Version.LUCENE_30));
Query prefixQuery = queryParser.parse("t*");
indexSearcher.search(prefixQuery, collector);
MultiTermQuery.default(forgot the name) rewriter will be used, if
The link
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/examples/resource-transformers.html#ServicesResourceTransformer
will
help.
Best regards,
Duke
If not now, when? If not me, who?
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Amal Kammoun wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Please do you have any advice regardin
eases; maybe that's what you are seeing? So, you must fully
> re-index after any DiskDVFormat field after upgrading ...
>
> Only the default formats support index back compatibility between releases.
>
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
>
Hi experts,
I'm upgrading Lucene 4.4 and trying to use DocValues instead of store field
for performance reason. But due to unknown size of index(depends on
customer), so I will use DiskDocValuesFormat, especially for some binary
field. Then I wrote my customized Codec:
final Codec codec = n
Most likely, the cause is what I said. I guess when you try to convert
bytes to number you didn't use the payload.offset to locate the right start
of bytes. Before 4.1, the start of payload is the expected value. But since
4.1, you must use the offset and length to get the correct bytes you
wanted.
I'm not sure your problem relates to the function or getting payload itslef.
But after 4.1, in DefaultSimilarity.scorePayload(int doc, int start, int
end, BytesRef payload), you must leverage payload.offset and payload.length
to get the bytes. (start and end won't get the exact bytes you want).
Ho
t possible you are indexing an absurdly enormous document...?
>
> Finally, it's possible this is a hardware issue; does it happen on
> other machines?
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Duke DAI wrote:
>
ou have a full traceback of the exception?
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Duke DAI wrote:
> > Hi friends,
> > Any one meet ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -65536 described in
> > https://issues.apache.org
Hi friends,
Any one meet ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -65536 described in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1995 after it declared being
fixed?
My lucene version is 3.0.3 and MaxRAMBufferSize is 3M. All other
configurations seem to be normal.
It's hard to describe the environment and
24 matches
Mail list logo
