Dipesh,
Start here.
http://poi.apache.org/
John G.
-Original Message-
From: dipesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 8:38 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Parsing MSWord
Hello,
I wanted to know if there are classes in Lucene that support parsing MSW
o I suspect you're
> doing something wrong.
>
> What evidence do you have that it's only the last field that's
> indexed?
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:28 PM, John Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> > Guys,
>
Guys,
I'm adding multiple fields with the same name to a document as Store.YES,
Indexed.TOKENIZED and it seems that only the last field entered is indexed.
I read about this somewhere her but now I can't find it, naturally. Is there
a work around? does someone have a pointer to this discussion? Ca
My previous question may be moot but as is it is still a problem. Here's a
little more info on my problem. The same named fields contain two pieces of
information, a code "B05" and a value "1" as follows. The value can be a
range such as 1 to 5 or 1 to 100.
"codesearch", "B05 1"
This field
Guys,
I have documents with multiple stored, tokenized fields of the same name but
different values in them such as:
"codesearch", "B01"
"codesearch", "B0105"
"codesearch", "Q01"
Etc;
I receive a new code to add to the document so I create a copy of the
document, call deleteFields
(true).
Mike
John Griffin wrote:
> Dimitri,
>
> Field.TOKENIZED and Field.NO_NORMs send their field's contents
> through a tokenizer and make their contents indexed and therefore
> searchable. FIELD.UN_TOKENIZED does not send its field's contents
> through a
>
Dimitri,
Field.TOKENIZED and Field.NO_NORMs send their field's contents
through a tokenizer and make their contents indexed and therefore
searchable. FIELD.UN_TOKENIZED does not send its field's contents through a
tokenizer but it still indexes its contents. Only Field.NO does not index
it
Try Hibernate Search - http://www.hibernate.org/410.html
John G.
-Original Message-
From: ??? [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 3:27 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Lucene Indexing DB records?
Guess I don't quite understand why there are so few posts ab
Dana,
RMI. We use it exclusively and we are able to cluster for fail-over. The
clustering complicates things quite a bit so you may not need or want it.
John G.
-Original Message-
From: DanaWhite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 9:54 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apac
Alexander,
RMI. We use it exclusively and we are able to cluster for fail-over. The
clustering complicates things quite a bit so you may not need or want it.
John G.
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Aristov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 10:35 AM
To: java-us
Xh,
Sorry about those questions. I received two copies of your email. The first
was corrupt.
We still need to see more code. No there isn't any special config necessary.
John G.
-Original Message-
From: xh sun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 8:34 PM
To: java-use
Xh,
We need to see a little more code her. Are you reopening the reader for each
query? If so are you closing it each time?
We need more information.
John G.
-Original Message-
From: xh sun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 8:34 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Use IndexWriter.setRAMBufferSizeMB(double mb) and you won't have to
sacrifice anything. It defaults to 16.0 MB so depending on the size of your
index you may want to make it larger. Do some testing at various values to
see where the sweet spot is.
John G.
-Original Message-
From: Dragon
Guys and Gals,
Is there a call that can be made at query time to determine what analyzer
was used at index time so the same analyzer can be used in the query? If
there is I can't find it.
John G.
Guys (and Gals),
A question on index deletions, what exactly happens to the Lucene document
numbers in an index when a document is deleted? Let's say I have a 5 doc
index.
Document # Doc
0 doc1
1
Chris,
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bamford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 9:15 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: newbie question (for John Griffin) - fixed
Hi John,
Please ignore my earlier questions on this subject, as I have got to the
riginal Message-
From: Chris Bamford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 5:58 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: newbie question (for John Griffin)
Hi John,
Further to my question below, I did some back-to-basics investigation of
PhraseQueries and found that ev
they are not related , so when you like to look for english string you
dont need to look for it in arabic and so on. My question is it possible for
lucene to index multiple folderes in same time and put them in several
indexes?
thanks
John Griffin-3 wrote:
>
> Starz,
>
> How about
e and put them in several
indexes?
thanks
John Griffin-3 wrote:
>
> Starz,
>
> How about your code so we can see what you are doing? We're flying blind
> here.
>
> John G.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: starz10de [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Starz,
How about your code so we can see what you are doing? We're flying blind
here.
John G.
-Original Message-
From: starz10de [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 12:41 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Index different files in different folders in lucene
Yug,
In the root directory of your JBoss install there is a file that lists all
the jar files your version of JBoss is guaranteed to work with
(jar-versions.xml). It looks like the jar you're trying to add has a
dependency on another jar that doesn't have what it's looking for.
Get on the JBoss f
cene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Search question (newbie)
John,
Thanks, I think I'm getting this now So you created your own
BooleanQuery and parsed the string yourself, adding strings as
TermQuerys etc., rather than using a QueryParser ?
Cheers,
- Chris
John Griffin wrote:
> Chris
Miz,
The StandardAnalyzer recognizes email addresses as is. That is, it pays
attention to the '@' symbol. Just store an email address in a field and
search them normally.
This assumes you are going to store the different emails in separate fields.
There is an alternative strategy if you need it.
Matthew,
I not totally sure what you are asking but if it's 'where do I call the
explain method from?' it looks like you want to call it from the
IndexSearcher class. Look at the API docs for Searcher (the IndexSearcher's
superclass).
John G.
P.S.
If that's not it, look for explain in the API do
Chris,
I've had similar requirements in the past. First strip the quotes then
create a BooleanQuery consisting of two separate queries.
1. TermQuery for the first term - Fred
2. PrefixQuery for the second term - Flintstone
When you add each individual query to the BooleanQuery make sure the
Bool
P.S.
The Hibernate Search forum is at
http://forum.hibernate.org/viewforum.php?f=9
John G.
-Original Message-
From: oyesiji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 5:24 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Hibernate search (Problem adding new Record)
I am using
Try this:
FullTextSession fullTextSession = Search.createFullTextSession(session);
for (JobDescription jobDescription : jobDescriptions) {
fullTextSession.save(jobDescription);
} ^
|
Prashant,
In addition to the other suggestions, take a look at Hibernate Search at
http://www.hibernate.org/410.html.
It is specifically designed for full text search in DBs.
John G
_
From: Prashant Saraf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:57 AM
To: j
Ravinder,
If you want something from an index it has to be IN the index. So, store a
summary field in each document and make sure that field is part of the
query.
John G.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 7:58 PM
To:
Soren,
Your documents are being boosted. Because of the way document boost values
immediately go through some calculations and are stored in the index Luke
will always show 1.o as the boost value. There has been some talk in the
recent past that this should be removed from Luke since it is actuall
Don't forget old, venerable RMI. We use it for multiple remote indexes and
it works well.
John G.
-Original Message-
From: Jan Pieper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 5:20 AM
To: Lucene Mailinglist
Subject: remote stored index
Hi guys,
I want to use lucene for
Your users won't appreciate your closing the searcher on them. That is, if
you have a highly concurrent system.
I don't know about 2.3.0 yet. Haven't had much chance to see the changes but
with 2.2.0 I use an atomic counter. It's not that much to program.
Regards,
John G.
-Original Message-
Oh, duh! Of course it is. I've done that before.
Thanks Daniel.
John G.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Naber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 5:52 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Explanation
On Samstag, 24. November 2007, John Griffin
Is there a problem with the term frequency count (tf) and the
IndexSearcher.explain method? I'm searching the following string (fieldname
is description) for the term 'salesman' and receive the accompanying
explanation from IndexSearcher.explain(.). I've highlighted salesman.
score => 0.3362463
Bruno Dery wrote:
Hi all the following is using Lucene 2.2.0.
I've been trying to alter the scoring of my search results to boost by
date. My idea was to boost documents while indexing using the date but
it doesn't work. So I put together this little sample piece of code to
investigate furthe
Bruno Dery wrote:
Hi all the following is using Lucene 2.2.0.
I've been trying to alter the scoring of my search results to boost by
date. My idea was to boost documents while indexing using the date but
it doesn't work. So I put together this little sample piece of code to
investigate furthe
36 matches
Mail list logo
