Hi Mark Harwood
I know it's being a long time, but till now i was busy in developing the
database to store the keyword, document and no. of clicks of the document
for the keyword and their respective mappings.
now i want my database to communicate with lucene api and i cannot figure it
out where
Hi Sumit,
now i want my database to communicate with lucene api
I would recommend that it's the other way roundsee my earlier comment on
using FilterIndexReader and creating faked TermEnum and TermDocs to make your
database content appear as if it were part of the index when calling
hi Mark
Actually i am using object oriented database. Where can i find the
information regarding embedding lucene with database.
Thanks
mark harwood wrote:
Hi Sumit,
now i want my database to communicate with lucene api
I would recommend that it's the other way roundsee my earlier
To add to what Mark is saying, it's very important that watch out for the
first N results effect. If you showed a user a random set of documents with
crap
relevance I'll bet you that a good number will click on the first result
(call it user laziness or the Google I'm feeling lucky effect :)). You
Where can i find the information regarding embedding lucene with database.
Thanks
http://marceloochoa.blogspot.com/2007/09/running-lucene-inside-your-oracle-jvm.html
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-434
Cheers
Mark
hi
which file can i edit to change the scoring factors in lucene results
markharw00d wrote:
Thanks for the context - much more useful.
The challenge here is similar to that posed by offering end-user tagging
of content (see here
also
what is the lucene ranking (scoring documents) formula
sumittyagi wrote:
hi
which file can i edit to change the scoring factors in lucene results
markharw00d wrote:
Thanks for the context - much more useful.
The challenge here is similar to that posed by offering end-user
Hi Sumit,
Here's a good place to start:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/scoring.html
Steve
On 12/28/2007 at 12:30 PM, sumittyagi wrote:
also
what is the lucene ranking (scoring documents) formula
sumittyagi wrote:
hi which file can i edit to change the scoring factors in
hi..
thanks for the help
following your suggestions ..
i do not have the package org.apache.lucene.index , from where can i
download it to start this project
markharw00d wrote:
Thanks for the context - much more useful.
The challenge here is similar to that posed by offering end-user
ignore my previous msg... i got that package
sumittyagi wrote:
hi..
thanks for the help
following your suggestions ..
i do not have the package org.apache.lucene.index , from where can i
download it to start this project
markharw00d wrote:
Thanks for the context - much more
Thanks for the context - much more useful.
The challenge here is similar to that posed by offering end-user tagging of
content (see here
http://www.mail-archive.com/java-user@lucene.apache.org/msg17580.html ). The
main difference here being that words are added to docs implicitly by search
AUTOMATIC REPLY
LUX is closed until 7th January 2008
most information about LUX is available at www.lux.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Sumittyagi,
I think you can implement your factors in the scorer to obtain your
desired results.
2007/12/21, mark harwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think you need to describe your factors in more detail. Exactly what
do you want to achieve for your users?
We could be talking about any
actually i am writing a module to rerank the results, so i want to edit the
file which arrange the results and give them ranks,
or is there any other way i can use my module to rerank the results
markharw00d wrote:
I think you need to describe your factors in more detail. Exactly what
do
Again, if you could be precise about what factors will influence the ranking
that would help. Field names, what is wrong with existing ranking order and
some of the thinking about your proposed re-rank logic would be useful context.
In Lucene you have the options for individual query-clause
You still haven't explained *why* you want to rerank results. What
is the use-case you're trying to implement? Quite often it's turned
out for me that when I let folks on the list know what the use
case I'm trying to support is, they come up with much more elegant
solutions than I was thinking
16 matches
Mail list logo
