ks again,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: java-user-return-45439-paul.b.murdoch=saic@lucene.apache.org
[mailto:java-user-return-45439-paul.b.murdoch=saic@lucene.apache.org
] On Behalf Of Erick Erickson
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 12:45 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Batch
-Original Message-
> From: java-user-return-45433-paul.b.murdoch=saic@lucene.apache.org
> [mailto:java-user-return-45433-paul.b.murdoch=saic@lucene.apache.org
> ] On Behalf Of Mark Miller
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 10:48 AM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject:
:48 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Batch Indexing - best practice?
On 03/15/2010 10:41 AM, Murdoch, Paul wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Lucene 2.9.2. Currently, when creating my index, I'm
calling
indexWriter.addDocument(doc) for each Document I want to ind
:java-user-return-45433-paul.b.murdoch=saic@lucene.apache.org
] On Behalf Of Mark Miller
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 10:48 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Batch Indexing - best practice?
On 03/15/2010 10:41 AM, Murdoch, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm using
See http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveIndexingSpeed for plenty
of tips. Suggested by Mike just a few hours ago in another thread ...
--
Ian.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Murdoch, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm using Lucene 2.9.2. Currently, when creating my index, I'm calling
> ind
On 03/15/2010 10:41 AM, Murdoch, Paul wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Lucene 2.9.2. Currently, when creating my index, I'm calling
indexWriter.addDocument(doc) for each Document I want to index. The
Documents aren't large and I'm averaging indexing about 500 documents
every 90 seconds. I'd like to try
For some intermediate period of time when indexing, the document are
buffered in RAM. There is a complex interplay between several of the
parameters to an IndexWriter that govern how many documents are
indexed in RAM before being flushed to the FSDirectory.
Of course, if you specify a RAMdirector
Sorry , ask a question.
You say FSDirectory is RADdirectory as least until it flushes.
I cannot understand your means . May you please teach me what it means?
FSDirectory stored in filesystem , and RADdirectory stored in RAM.
MergeFactor and MaxBufferedDocs settings are limited and controlled
MAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Erik , so FSDirectory seems better option than RAMDirectory ? Also
I
think O.S can cache files in which case FSDirectory may not be bad , your
thoughts ?
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 7:07
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: batch indexing
As I understand it, FSDirectory *is* RAMdirectory, at least until
it flushes. There have been several discussions of this,
search the mail archive for things like MergeFactor, MaxBufferedDocs
and the like. You'll find quite a bit of information about how
As I understand it, FSDirectory *is* RAMdirectory, at least until
it flushes. There have been several discussions of this,
search the mail archive for things like MergeFactor, MaxBufferedDocs
and the like. You'll find quite a bit of information about how these
parameters interact.
Particularly, s
Hey Eric,
I think you want:
fsWriter.addIndexes(Directory[] {ramDir});
to be:
fsWriter.addIndexes(new Directory[]{ramDir});
JAMES
--- zheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a novice in lucene. I write some code to do
> batch indexing using
> RAMDirectory according to the code provided in
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
