a-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 2:35:02 PM
Subject: Re: search problem when indexed using Field.setOmitTf()
This is expected: phrase searches will not work when you omitTf.
omitTf means positional information about tokens is not saved in
the index.
Span queries & p
27;s more self-descriptive.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Michael McCandless
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 2:35:02 PM
Subject: Re: search problem when indexed using Field.setOmitTf()
This is
even consider renaming this so it's more self-descriptive.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Michael McCandless
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 2:35:02 PM
> Subject: Re: searc
Siraj Haider wrote:
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
This is expected: phrase searches will not work when you omitTf.
But why would a phrase query be created? The code given looks like
it
should create a boolean query with two terms.
Of
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>
>> This is expected: phrase searches will not work when you omitTf.
>>
>
> But why would a phrase query be created? The code given looks like it
> should create a boolean query with two terms.
>
> Of cour
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> This is expected: phrase searches will not work when you omitTf.
But why would a phrase query be created? The code given looks like it
should create a boolean query with two terms.
Of course, the given code also uses "" as the default
This is expected: phrase searches will not work when you omitTf.
omitTf means positional information about tokens is not saved in the
index. Span queries & phrase queries require that positional
information to work.
Mike
Siraj Haider wrote:
We are having a problem running searches on an
We are having a problem running searches on an index after upgrading to
2.4 and using the new Field.setOmitTf() function. The index size has
been dramatically reduces and even the search performace is better. But
searches do not return any results if searching for something that has a
space i
