[The Java Posse] Re: 'Posse BoF 2009 -- the video

> > No Josh, not tail recursion, ->tail calls<- :) then I guess I don't understand. My last interaction with this stuff was a LISP class about 15 years ago. :) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The J

[The Java Posse] Re: 'Posse BoF 2009 -- the video

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Joshua Marinacci wrote: > > No Josh, not tail recursion, ->tail calls<- :) > > > then I guess I don't understand. My last interaction with this stuff was a > LISP class about 15 years ago. :) > :) "Tail-call optimization (or tail-call merging or tail-call elimin

[The Java Posse] Re: Continue with the interview, they are GREAT!

On Jun 12, 7:00 pm, Sam wrote: > +1 > > The interviews and newscasts are both great. And don't worry about > long podcasts either. The more content the better. I like lots of content, too, but would much prefer two 45 minute podcasts to one 90 minite one. --~--~-~--~~~---

[The Java Posse] JavaPosse Episode 1x00 Video

Hi All Here is my video version almost full length. Missed the singing at the beginning http://www.vimeo.com/5197059 N-joi "Aye!" ;-D Peter Pilgrim http://jroller.com/peter_pilgrim/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message

[The Java Posse] Re: Continue with the interview, they are GREAT!

> I like lots of content, too, but would much prefer two 45 minute > podcasts to one 90 minite one. I agree, it's easier to keep the listening up-to-date this way =) []s, -- Paulo Renato C. Siqueira Project Leader at IPTI (http://www.ipti.org.br/) Visit my blog: http://www.jcranky.com/ --~--~

[The Java Posse] Re: Java FX Studio beta available?

If you are talking about JavaFX design tool showed on stage at Java One then it will be available by the end of year. Hopefully. On Jun 14, 9:01 am, Victor Grazi wrote: > Hello, is there any way to download a beta of Java FX studio?Much thanks, > Victor --~--~-~--~~~-

[The Java Posse] Re: 'Posse BoF 2009 -- the video

okay. so this roughly corresponds with my dim memories. It's a way of doing deep recursive calls without having to fill up your stack five billion levels. So... back to the big question. If the JVM is essentially an 8bit stack based CPU with dynamic optimizations underneath, why can't you

[The Java Posse] Re: jdk 1.6u13 for OSX

The developer preview was working good, but with the "final": - No more 1.6 in FF webstart - No more 1.6 in Safari - IntelliJ does not even starts!! FYI: IntelliJ was fixed with "cp /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Resources/MacOS/JavaApplicationStub64 /Applications/IntelliJ\ IDEA\ 8.1.

[The Java Posse] Re: 'Posse BoF 2009 -- the video

I just started looking into this myself, so I may be off-base, but it seems the difficulty is that at compile time, your optimization options are limited when it comes to non-final classes and jumps to functions other than itself. Word on the street has it, JVM has a much better shot at collaps

[The Java Posse] Re: 'Posse BoF 2009 -- the video

This language feature should be at the bottom of your list. I rather get closures than this. But you guys are better off spending time finishing the more important bits of JavaFX; * Tooling * Components (A real list component, table, tree, etc) * Video capture (I get depressed everytime I google

[The Java Posse] Re: 'Posse BoF 2009 -- the video

Tooling More components (like TreeTable) Swing 2, with java 5 features (enums, generics etc) (Maybe JavaFX will become this eventually...) A real date picker. Usable from Swing! JBrowserPane (or whatever is its called. We need a browser component) (JDIC wont do) Get rid of Calendar and Date. In ot

[The Java Posse] Re: 'Posse BoF 2009 -- the video

There are plenty of date pickers available for download. Why should one be bundled with the JVM and make it even larger? These guys should work on the language. If we want Swing to be updated, perhaps it should be done through open source by those who want it. JavaFX is where all the work is going

[The Java Posse] java store blog

could you review this for gaffs before it gets picked up wide? http://weblogs.java.net/blog/joshy/archive/2009/06/the_java_store.html thanks, J --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Poss

[The Java Posse] Re: 'Posse BoF 2009 -- the video

On 17 Jun., 19:48, Robert Casto wrote: > There are plenty of date pickers available for download. Why should one be > bundled with the JVM and make it even larger? Yeah, dates are so rarely used in user interfaces! :p Seriously, I've heard people say this before but I also don't think they have

[The Java Posse] Re: java store blog

Looks good, I think a neat feature is that you guys are autogenerating the JNLP and for games are including native libraries like lwjgl and others. Maybe you don't want to get into the techie stuff in there, but it seems important enough to mention (I think the Java store might be the perfect plac

[The Java Posse] Re: 'Posse BoF 2009 -- the video

Good reply Casper :) Getting 3rd party datepickers to look "right" on the different Lafs is next to impossible. The SwingX one particulary. JSR-296 was (according to Alexander Potochkin) reawakened, but it died soon after. There is next to none information

[The Java Posse] Re: Java FX Studio beta available?

No alphas or betas? On Jun 17, 2009, at 12:24 PM, "wojciech.halicki.piszko" wrote: > > If you are talking about JavaFX design tool showed on stage at Java > One then it will be available by the end of year. Hopefully. > > On Jun 14, 9:01 am, Victor Grazi wrote: >> Hello, is there any way to d

[The Java Posse] Re: Java FX Studio beta available?

None that anybody is aware of. BTW it's not called "Java FX Studio" although that name is a bit better than the generic public moniker it has right now : JavaFX Authoring Tool/JavaFX Design Tool. On Jun 17, 5:01 pm, Victor Grazi wrote: > No alphas or betas? > > On Jun 17, 2009, at 12:24 PM, "wo

[The Java Posse] Re: Java FX Studio beta available?

Ooh that name hurts my ears On Jun 17, 2009, at 5:05 PM, Augusto wrote: > > None that anybody is aware of. > > BTW it's not called "Java FX Studio" although that name is a bit > better than the generic public moniker it has right now : JavaFX > Authoring Tool/JavaFX Design Tool. > > On Jun 17,

[The Java Posse] Re: jdk 1.6u13 for OSX

Mario, Thanks for the suggestion - changing netbeans_jdkhome to 1.6, it was 1.5, cured the problem (I am on Intel). Cheers, -- Howard. On Jun 16, 11:46 pm, Mario Camou wrote: > If you're having problems, check the file: > /Applications/Netbeans/ Netbeans>.app/Contents/Resources/NetBeans/etc/

[The Java Posse] Calculation Engine

I was just listening to episode #245 where Dick mentioned that he was working on a Calculation Engine. I was wondering what sorts of open source calculation engines exist, and what types of calculations do they implement. The latter question may seem rather naive, but I'm curious as to whether th

[The Java Posse] Re: Java FX Studio beta available?

:) the product doesn't have a final name yet, so we are just calling it the designer tool because it's targeted at designers. On Jun 17, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Victor Grazi wrote: > > Ooh that name hurts my ears > > On Jun 17, 2009, at 5:05 PM, Augusto > wrote: > >> >> None that anybody is aware