Thanks Josh,
Well that explains it then ;-) I followed a link from the JavaPassion
tutorial and then somewhere off there I found I Java FX for Java
programmers tutorial - it was in there, admittedly dated 2007.
That link you sent I had found before, but it's awkward because I have
no internet
Be careful, there were a lot of pre 1.0 samples on the net and they
are worse than useless as so much has changed since 1.0 to 1.2
Stick to javafx.com, sun.com and sites like http://fxexperience.com/
http://learnjavafx.typepad.com/ which are up to date.
This may also be helpful:
To add to Steven's list, we kicked off a new community-based JavaFX
samples site at http://jfxtras.org/. Everything has full source code
and is BSD licensed so you can re-use it without concern.
We try to keep things as up-to-date as possible. Right now I am in the
process of validating
Since this is my first post on the javaposse, I would like to give my
most warm thanks to the posse members, I've been listening to the
podcast for a number of years now, you made a terrific job of it,
giving a very valuable service to the community.
Here's my perspective on java language
Rob Wilson - BabyDuke JUG wrote:
Thanks Josh,
Well that explains it then ;-) I followed a link from the JavaPassion
tutorial and then somewhere off there I found I Java FX for Java
programmers tutorial - it was in there, admittedly dated 2007.
Hmm. All the example codes and external
I really don't think anybody here is seriously trying to argue the
case that the BGGA proposal was a complete no-brainer.
The problem of an entirely different nature: A proposal with the
effort and momentum of BGGA was simply not reacted on by sun. Sure, a
blog here, a blog there, but nothing
Hello Fabrizio
Thanks for your questions. Sorry it's taken so long to reply. I was
off-line for most of the weekend. This gave me plenty of time to
compose the reply so I guess I should offer a second apology for its
length.
(Some might wonder why I bring up museum pieces like Oberon and
Also try www.jfxstudio.org, which is a site full of javafx doodles
that various people have created (and a good place to show off your
own stuff too).
We just started our monthly coding contest back up as well. Do
something cool in only 30 lines of code. The deadline is the end of
Hi Sang Shin,
Sorry, I was not implying it was on the JavaPassion Java FX pages, I
followed a link from your course that then linked to another resource
- I tend to follow many links but unfortunately I can't find the route
I took. If I do stumble across it again, I'll let you know.
By the way,
BIAS DISCLAIMER - features mention below are favored by me!
The tension between backward compatibility and introducing new
features seems be the problem, there are ways out of this problem,
e.g.:
1. Introduce a source statement before the package statement at the
start of the file, e.g. source
JavaFX wishlist (from a .NET/Java programmer perspective):
#1: Stability. Better handling of unresponsive apps. Even just
exploring the official samples, I get some crashes, hangs, and minute+
loading times.
#2: As a basic barometer of quality/stability, I'd like to see a
JavaFX-based
not if we find a way around the chicken and egg problem.
brainstorm: assume a projection based system and no backwards
compatibility issues (an IDE and SCM and code review tool etc.
magically exists which supports the new system): then you could do:
* locked blocks. Parts of your code
Massimo wrote:
JavaFX wishlist (from a .NET/Java programmer perspective):
#1: Stability. Better handling of unresponsive apps. Even just
exploring the official samples, I get some crashes, hangs, and minute+
loading times.
#2: As a basic barometer of quality/stability, I'd like to see a
13 matches
Mail list logo
