On Sep 28, 7:39 pm, Richard Vowles wrote:
> This entire interview was a cop-out by Alex and Joe. Their argument
> boiled down to "look, Sun open sourced Java and now we don't have to
> do anything".
In no way did Joe or I state or imply that Sun has "open sourced
Java". Sun has open sourced the
Yes, with Atlassian and Google in sydney, would be some interest,
surely.
They are often sponsoring things here, and I can't drink the beer all
by myself (but by gosh I am trying).
On Sep 29, 3:49 pm, AaronW wrote:
> I second that request! maybe sponsored by the unoffical
> javaposse
I second that request! maybe sponsored by the unoffical
javaposse sponsors who just happend to be based in Sydney hint
hint (atlassian)
On Sep 29, 10:29 am, Michael Neale wrote:
> and my "javaposse" I mean "javaposse roundup" !
>
> On Sep 29, 10:28 am, Michael Neale wrote:
>
> >
This entire interview was a cop-out by Alex and Joe. Their argument
boiled down to "look, Sun open sourced Java and now we don't have to
do anything". Oracle just bought a turkey if this attitude is
pervasive at Sun.
On Sep 25, 12:17 am, Robert Lally wrote:
> After all the discussions about Coin
and my "javaposse" I mean "javaposse roundup" !
On Sep 29, 10:28 am, Michael Neale wrote:
> (or Melbourne, or NZ) etc..
>
> was some talk of it a while back...
>
> I am sure at least *some* of the posse members would be willing to
> make the trek.
>
> Note: from SFO to Sydney is 14 hours or less
(or Melbourne, or NZ) etc..
was some talk of it a while back...
I am sure at least *some* of the posse members would be willing to
make the trek.
Note: from SFO to Sydney is 14 hours or less (was just under 12 hours
flight back for me last June) with NO stopovers, direct, non stop. (in
AU/NZ te
POSWSAXHTML
Plain Old Scala With Servlets And (literal) XHTML (and throw in some
jquery on the client).
Worked a charm, no extra dependencies (other then scala). Nice and
minimalist.
On Sep 26, 5:25 am, CKoerner wrote:
> I'm curious on what people feel are the top 3 Java based web
> framework
On top of that answers to pretty much anything rails and ruby related
are just a google (or a bing !) away - due to the prolofic nature of
the enthusiasts that use it and just have to blog about every little
detail -seemed irritating at the time, but the by the power of
greyskull, and the communit
not sure about component market, but wicket does a pretty good job at
packaging reusable components - even entire pages
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Ruben Reusser wrote:
> how so? Last time I checked it was pretty hard to make a GWT app look good
> (unless you go with GWTEXT and that one use
how so? Last time I checked it was pretty hard to make a GWT app look good
(unless you go with GWTEXT and that one uses transitional html, not strict)
- is it easy to say build a larger app (for example a community site) with
GWT? Are the components available and do they work together?
Ruben
On M
I'd say GWT does that pretty well.
Alexey
2001 Honda CBR600F4i (CCS)
2002 Suzuki Bandit 1200S
1992 Kawasaki EX500
http://azinger.blogspot.com
http://bsheet.sourceforge.net
http://wcollage.sourceforge.net
From: Ruben Reusser
To: javaposse@googlegroups.com
Sen
I'd really love to see a java web framework that promotes writing reusable
components for the web, makes it easy to merge those components into an
application and comes with a component marketplace. Has anybody seen a
framework that's good at doing this? (and it would be great if everything
looks a
Has anyone looked at scala and lift? And, these are scripting languages within
java frameworks. Wouldn`t Velocity vm templates fit into this with servlets? or
struts2 spring if they haven't been discussed already?
> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:16:13 -0700
> Subject: [The Java Posse] Re: The Top
ya, depends on what you are doing. If java language integration is
the most important thing to you, groovy beats ruby presently. else
Ruby
On Sep 27, 8:31 pm, Raphael M wrote:
> Grails and Wicket for me.
>
> Everything that Phil said about groovy is right. But the Grails being
> a copy of Rail
I second Casper's suggestions and comments too.
On Sep 26, 3:36 am, Casper Bang wrote:
> Wicket (for wide-spectred Internet solutions) or GWT (for targeted
> intranet or high-interactivity solutions) for me. The only ones that
> deliver rather than being some ivory tower experiment.
>
> /Casper
CodeMash is a great conference. I spoke there this year and enjoyed
the trip (other than the biting cold and the speeding ticket :).
As far as where else to hear cross-technology talks, I would also
recommend Strange Loop in St. Louis Oct 22-23rd which covers a broad
range of technologies. http
I'd have to say Wicket is my favourite as well. I love the component
based approach with minimal xml. Keeping everything in java is much
easier to test and debug.
Aidan
On Sep 25, 1:20 pm, gwak wrote:
> From my experience:
> Spring MVC, Struts, JSF.
> A call out to Wicket which is my favorit
Grails and Wicket for me.
Everything that Phil said about groovy is right. But the Grails being
a copy of Rails is a great underestimation of Grails.
It is a copy in the sense that most features are copied, specially
developer ergonomics coming first together with convention over
configuration, s
FYI
http://www.manning.com/popquiz/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
2009/9/28 Alex Turner
> Forgive my ignorance, but isn't this only an issue if you treat jsp like
> php? If you are using a framework like stripes, you can sanitize the input
> in the controller either with an interceptor or by putting sanitization
> logic in the set method in the action bean. T
20 matches
Mail list logo
