[The Java Posse] Re: Java Has Always Had Closures

2011-09-12 Thread Tom Hawtin
On Sep 12, 4:05 pm, Cédric Beust ♔ wrote: > Jave has indeed had closures since day one (e.g. Runnable, Callable, > etc...). If you're not convinced, ask yourself the following question: is > there any programming construct that you will be able to do in Java 8 with > closure support that you can'

[The Java Posse] Re: The perm space "problem" myth

2011-05-22 Thread Tom Hawtin
lected, which doesn't appear to be true. There are ClassLoader leaks associated with the Java libraries, including ThreadLocal, JDBC DriverManager and Java Beans. Tom Hawtin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to thi

[The Java Posse] Re: {{}} (#338)

2011-02-03 Thread Tom Hawtin
On Feb 3, 4:55 pm, jwd wrote: > This instance initializer syntax seems to get rediscovered every year > or so.  The first identification as a Java idiom that I was aware of > was Paul Holser'shttp://www.pholser.com/writings/concisions.htmlFWIW > the language specification for this can be found >

[The Java Posse] Re: But do people really refactor?

2010-11-24 Thread Tom Hawtin
On Nov 23, 6:19 pm, Cédric Beust ♔ wrote: > By "frictionless", do you mean "manual", "error prone" and "taking forever"? I mean the flow is: program, program, program Just working on the text. Whereas trying to use refactoring: program, deal with idiotic IDE, find where you were, progra

[The Java Posse] Re: But do people really refactor?

2010-11-23 Thread Tom Hawtin
On Nov 22, 10:29 am, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > I see that the word "refactoring" never appears. If I'm not wrong, > there's almost no support for refactoring Objective C in XCode, right? > So, when you do a comparison, shouldn't be blamed for this? If you have a decent text editor, then doing a

[The Java Posse] Re: Inner Class Conundrum

2010-11-23 Thread Tom Hawtin
On Nov 22, 4:53 pm, Craig Kelley wrote: > We have an application targeting jre6 that is getting null pointer > exceptions from variables supposedly declared final, referenced from > inner classes. I am guess the difference is in the javac compilation, and which JRE version you are targeting. `ja

[The Java Posse] Re: JavaFX script to be dropped, JavaFX 2.0 will be an API on the JVM, usable from Java

2010-09-20 Thread Tom Hawtin
The race is on... I think we know which language is #1. Tom Hawtin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, sen

[The Java Posse] Re: Episode 315 - IDE discussion

2010-07-19 Thread Tom Hawtin
On Jul 19, 12:26 am, Lhasadad wrote: > swing had not come out.  Even after Swing came out there was still an > interest in something that performed better (Swing was not a barn > burner in the beginning)  Also in those days Sun was not all that fast Swing on JRE 1.1 wasn't too bad. Swing in JRE

[The Java Posse] Re: High-Performance Arbitrary precision numerical calculations in Java (Mandelbrot Set!)

2010-03-25 Thread Tom Hawtin
I guess fixed point makes most sense. You aren't going to need values outside of, er, [-2, 2] (it's a long time since my second year maths project). There also isn't much point in specially handling values much smaller. So even long would get you a few more bits than double. Unfortunately Java (or

[The Java Posse] Re: Posse #225: Closure proposals - I don't care, just give me one.

2009-01-16 Thread Tom Hawtin
o you think that BGGA is free of corner cases? Tom Hawtin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubsc

[The Java Posse] Re: #225 - Wish list for Java 8 and 9

2009-01-16 Thread Tom Hawtin
e the situation when it does occur are: declare adding such an overloading a binary incompatible change for old versions; or declare one of the the overloads as the default for old versions. Tom Hawtin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are s

[The Java Posse] Re: #225 - Wish list for Java 8 and 9

2009-01-15 Thread Tom Hawtin
On Jan 14, 3:28 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote: > com.package.ContainingClass.foobar(Ljava/util/List;V) > com.package.ContainingClass.foobar(Ljava/util/List;I) > > which is not okay - being only different in return type is not > allowed. This isn't a big concern and is not generally covered by wh

[The Java Posse] Re: Are there benefits to a modular JVM for server-side development?

2008-12-29 Thread Tom Hawtin
sspath on a command line. For modules we have pretty, simplified powerpoint graphs. The graphs contain much more information and different sorts of relationships, but look easy because you haven't been shown the text representation. Tom Hawtin [1] http://faqs.irishferries.com/sailingupdate/

[The Java Posse] Re: Christmas Wishlist Trivia

2008-12-24 Thread Tom Hawtin
On Dec 24, 1:27 am, Hairless_ape wrote: > Women.(at least you are on the list) > Free women.(yes you rank below beer) I can't understand why they don't want to work with us. Tom --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the G

[The Java Posse] Re: Christmas Wishlist Trivia

2008-12-23 Thread Tom Hawtin
On Dec 23, 10:51 pm, Paul Wallace wrote: > On a holiday theme, what are the things that would make your working > environment more appealing and productive?  Perhaps you have the ideal > working environment already? For me the list, more or less in order, looks something like: - Lights that do

[The Java Posse] Episode #222 - Google Native Client (NaCl)

2008-12-22 Thread Tom Hawtin
ld starts. As a choice for new mobile content it would be an eccentric choice. I *think* it's destined for obscurity. Tom Hawtin (Disclosure: I work for Sun, but these are my own opinions.) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscri

[The Java Posse] Re: Java 7 features - NO CLOSURES!

2008-12-11 Thread Tom Hawtin
On Dec 11, 6:02 pm, Hairless_ape wrote: > > I'm afraid that with this, Java is dying. Bingo! I believe that appears on the "worst blog titles for 2009" Devoxx whiteboard. Tom --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl

[The Java Posse] Re: Ep #217: Licensing

2008-11-19 Thread Tom Hawtin
think if you redefine the portmanteau as "f** retard" the podcast makes more sense. "Slashtard" is a more useful word anyway. Back to the topic: If I'm going to be personally interested, I want to know if it is Apache 2, or possibly BSD-like. I&

[The Java Posse] Episode 210 IdentityHashSet

2008-10-07 Thread Tom Hawtin
.). Tom Hawtin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROT

[The Java Posse] Re: Tracing JIT compiler for Firefox

2008-09-01 Thread Tom Hawtin
d to have problems when inner loops were embedded in large methods. That was only a problem with really badly written code, such as microbenchmarks and Swing. Tom Hawtin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &quo

[The Java Posse] Re: Your dad's Java, the one about the man (who started it all)

2008-08-28 Thread Tom Hawtin
vaPosse audio when listening to other podcasts (thanks guys!). And the appropriate quantity of dross. Tom Hawtin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this gr