I would be surprised if any J2ME phones were ones people were attached
to - its more like grudging acceptance. Even blackberry kind of did
their own thing.
I think the most common response is Joe's flinging his razor into
orbit ;)
On Jul 2, 1:14 am, Joshua Marinacci wrote:
> This is incorrect.
This is incorrect. There are over a billion installations of Java on
cellphones. Google has made J2ME based clients before Android and
continues to do so. If you want to hit more than 5% of the market you
have to use Java.
On Jul 1, 2009, at 5:24 AM, Casper Bang wrote:
>
> I'm surprised I
Fabrizio, I don't feel like hijacking this thread, posted follow-up
here instead:
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse/browse_thread/thread/9235ad4faf559ff5
/Casper
On 1 Jul., 14:30, Fabrizio Giudici
wrote:
> Casper Bang wrote:
> > And on the mobile, Java
> > was never as popular (forget Go
Do they twitter? perhaps if we know that Francis is about to eat a
caesar salad, then all we be forgiven.
On Jul 1, 8:44 pm, Jim Blackler wrote:
> Status Quo the band contribute very little to open source. Francis
> Rossi did a handful of Eclipse patches, that's it.
>
> 2009/7/1 Christian Catch
Casper Bang wrote:
> And on the mobile, Java
> was never as popular (forget Gosling/Schwartz gazillion evangelism) as
> now with Android.
>
Can you define "popular"? Possibly in terms of number of installations?
Thanks. :-)
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.
I'm surprised I haven't heard Dick complain about Google Earth, Picasa
etc. not being written to run on the JVM. It's particular interesting
that for these popular applications, Google actually prefers to pour
money into Wine rather than implement in Java. And on the mobile, Java
was never as popu
Status Quo the band contribute very little to open source. Francis
Rossi did a handful of Eclipse patches, that's it.
2009/7/1 Christian Catchpole :
>
> nothing... if you base your exceptions on the band, they will be
> pretty high.
>
> On Jul 1, 7:13 pm, Michael Neale wrote:
>> And what is wron
nothing... if you base your exceptions on the band, they will be
pretty high.
On Jul 1, 7:13 pm, Michael Neale wrote:
> And what is wrong with the band?
>
> On Jul 1, 7:00 pm, Christian Catchpole
> wrote:
>
> > How things have changed. 15 years ago, an organization 'giving away
> > source code
And what is wrong with the band?
On Jul 1, 7:00 pm, Christian Catchpole
wrote:
> How things have changed. 15 years ago, an organization 'giving away
> source code' would have their directors committed to a psychiatric
> institution. I'm not complaining.. just pointing out that right or
> wrong
How things have changed. 15 years ago, an organization 'giving away
source code' would have their directors committed to a psychiatric
institution. I'm not complaining.. just pointing out that right or
wrong our expectations of an organization are based on status quo (the
concept, not that band)
10 matches
Mail list logo
