My educational background is in Finance and Economics, so I frequently
find myself agreeing with Joe on a lot of the business and
intellectual property-related discussions. However, I just can't get
over his defense of software and business process patents.
In the latest episode where Paul
In a free and open society it is easy to find fault in complicated systems,
just as it is easy to have a bias, pick sides and misrepresent the facts. One
example in this thread, I may be wrong, but I think there is good reason for
simplifying the patent granting process from who invented it
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Scott Melton
scott_rides_ag...@yahoo.comwrote:
In a free and open society it is easy to find fault in complicated systems,
just as it is easy to have a bias, pick sides and misrepresent the facts.
One example in this thread, I may be wrong, but I think there
on this model is a rarely helpful yet necessary weevil.
Caution should be to limit it where ever possible.
Opinion sent from my ASS phone.
--- On Thu, 4/8/10, Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [The Java Posse] Software Patents
helpful yet necessary
weevil. Caution should be to limit it where ever possible.
Opinion sent from my ASS phone.
--- On *Thu, 4/8/10, Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com* wrote:
From: Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [The Java Posse] Software Patents and Joe bashing
to not be completely off topic.
Please, you folks that know something about this issue, carry on.
--- On Thu, 4/8/10, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [The Java Posse] Software Patents and Joe bashing
To: javaposse@googlegroups.com
for upholding
monopolies by approving of patent law. And if it turns out to be not
feasible, we should change it.
--- On *Thu, 4/8/10, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com* wrote:
From: Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [The Java Posse] Software Patents
To: javaposse
On 09/04/10 08:13, Scott Melton wrote:
Would you agree that patents and property rights greatly accelerate
the rate of innovations, accelerating the growth of a free market
economy?
Not at all -- I claim the opposite and the jury is still out. Even
proponents of patent law seem to
I have little knowledge about the topic(only an opinion) and do not wish to
join the discussion. Please carry on.
Cheers!
--- On Thu, 4/8/10, Peter Becker peter.becker...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Peter Becker peter.becker...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [The Java Posse] Software Patents
To: javaposse
There is a supreme court case that has already been heard on business
method patents. Some think if the Supreme Court finds that business
method patents aren't valid all software patents are out the window:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Bilski
This blog (Brad Feld, he's a venture
Great news :)
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:11 PM, phil.swen...@gmail.com
phil.swen...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a supreme court case that has already been heard on business
method patents. Some think if the Supreme Court finds that business
method patents aren't valid all software patents are
wohooo!
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:11 PM, phil.swen...@gmail.com
phil.swen...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a supreme court case that has already been heard on business
method patents. Some think if the Supreme Court finds that business
method patents aren't valid all software patents are out the
I was kind of disappointed by the discussion of the Apple vs. HTC case -
especially the lack of specifics. Maybe the Posse members were busy
preparing the round up, and other things, but I was surprised to hear
several times something along the lines of We don't know what the patents
Apple is
13 matches
Mail list logo
