Bugs item #442329, was opened at 2001-07-18 01:38
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=442329group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 BETA (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Bugs item #442360, was opened at 2001-07-18 03:48
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=442360group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v2.2.2 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to:
Patches item #442380, was opened at 2001-07-18 04:55
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=442380group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tomasz Skutnik (tskutnik)
User: cgjung
Date: 01/07/18 05:02:02
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment Deployment.java
Log:
Deployment opened up for subclassing (e.g., to re-introduce pure directory
deployments via the J2eeDeployer). extended Mbean interface added to access
scoped deployments.
User: cgjung
Date: 01/07/18 05:02:02
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment/scope
J2eeGlobalScopeDeployer.java
Added: src/main/org/jboss/deployment/scope
J2eeGlobalScopeDeployerMBean.java
Log:
Deployment opened up for
Patches item #442381, was opened at 2001-07-18 05:04
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=442381group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tomasz Skutnik (tskutnik)
Patches item #442382, was opened at 2001-07-18 05:06
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=442382group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tomasz Skutnik (tskutnik)
I've submitted 3 patches on SourceForge that finish the job. Your CVS
update was not complete (see description in patch no 1).
Review and submitt if you please.
--
Tomasz Skutnik
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL
Tomasz Skutnik wrote:
I've submitted 3 patches on SourceForge that finish the job. Your CVS
update was not complete (see description in patch no 1).
Review and submitt if you please.
--
Tomasz Skutnik
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Sorry, should have said started us down the road to pfd2. I did enough to
get the j2ee tutorial connector working.
I've taken these three patches and I'll apply them to CVS. Thanks for your
work...
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Skutnik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
Tomasz Skutnik wrote:
I've submitted 3 patches on SourceForge that finish the job. Your CVS
update was not complete (see description in patch no 1).
Review and submitt if you please.
--
Tomasz Skutnik
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:36:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/resource RARMetaData.java
Log:
Completed update to pfd2, more changes to DTD.
Thanks to Tomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +3 -3
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:38:23
Modified:src/resources/jdbc-rar/META-INF ra.xml
Log:
Completed update of jbosscx to Connector 1.0 pfd2
Thanks to Thomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +3 -3
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:40:14
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/jms/ra/META-INF ra.xml
Log:
Completed update of jbosscx to Connector 1.0 pfd2 spec.
Thanks to Thomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +3 -3
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:40:13
Modified:src/etc/deploy jbosspool-jdbc.rar
Log:
Completed update of jbosscx to Connector 1.0 pfd2 spec.
Thanks to Thomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +40 -50
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:40:15
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/metadata connector_1_0.dtd
Log:
Completed update of jbosscx to Connector 1.0 pfd2 spec.
Thanks to Thomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +13 -13
Bugs item #442479, was opened at 2001-07-18 09:48
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=442479group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jay Walters (jwalters)
I need to use a scheduler to hit some ejbs - apparently jboss has one,
although I can find no examples/documentation on how to use this.
Anyone know of any pointers?
Cheers
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Tim
The JBoss Scheduler is still under development but for a simple
Scheduler ready to use.
At the end of the jboss.jcml file there is a Scheduler MBean
(commented out) with the example Scheduler. You have to do:
- Create an implemenation of org.jboss.util.Schedulable interface
- Adjust the
http://www.jboss.org/documentation/HTML/ch11s52.html
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Tim
Fox
Envoyé : mercredi 18 juillet 2001 19:48
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [JBoss-dev] Any examples of using the scheduler
I need to use a
User: starksm
Date: 01/07/18 13:08:54
Modified:src/build Tag: Branch_2_4 build.xml run_tests.xml
Log:
Up the timeout to allow the performance tests to complete
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.34.2.2 +1
User: starksm
Date: 01/07/18 13:10:37
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/perf/test Tag: Branch_2_4 Setup.java
Log:
Dump out any error seen during setup/teardown
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.2.2.2 +27
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 03:38:29PM -0400, Jay Walters wrote:
Do I need an MBean for each connector which I'm deploying to JBossCX (maybe
I'm really confused here)? It seems that this is how the two which are
distributed with the standard JBoss release are configured. Is this how it
works
I was working with jboss2.4 beta and now the code
that reads this file strips out the cr/lf since it is using
BufferedReader.readLine(). This works fine for most xml
but for MBeans that use and attribute that contains multiple properties
like this:
mbean
Throwing away the new lines is not correct. The jboss.jcml file is an xml file and it
does not have line oriented semantics. The change you propose to add in the
missing new line makes sense. I'll add it to the next beta release which
will come out tomorrow.
- Original Message -
From:
The jbosspool
project doesn't seem to be branched or in synch with jboss
2.4.
I would like to
merge the transaction isolation feature I added to jbosspool and jboss
2.5(mainline) into 2.4, but I'm not the procedure to do in CVS. Do I just
commit a new jbosspool.jar built from the
No, you need to branch the jbosspool cvs module. How to do this is described
in the cvs admin doc: http://www.jboss.org/CVSAdmin.jsp
Its the CHECKING IN A PATCH ON A NON-JBOSS CVS MODULE RELEASE BRANCH
procedure except that the patch is already included in the module branch since the
2.4 branch
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 59
Successful tests: 59
Errors:0
Failures: 0
[time of test: 19 July 2001 3:45 GMT]
See http://lubega.com
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/07/18 20:42:08
Modified:src/lib Tag: Branch_2_4 jbosspool.jar
Log:
merged jbosspool TransactionIsolation, block timeout, and PS cache size settings
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
FYI
Hi Bill,
I'm also worried about this same scenario with the new locking stuff in
the
mainline. With notifyAll instead of just notify is there a chance to
starve
threads? With notify aren't you guarateed FIFO for lock contention, but
you
wouldn't be guaranteed with a notifyAll?
notify does
Also add a Rel_2_4_0_21 tag to the jbosspool module on the 2.4 branch
to tie the module code to the binary jar with the same tag in the jboss module.
The non-jboss cvs modules are not labeled independent of the jboss module,
so every change on the 2.4 branch is a change to the jboss release.
Thanks Georg for clearing that up.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Georg
Rehfeld
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 12:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] new wait(1000) not good
Hi Bill,
I'm also worried
33 matches
Mail list logo
