I have the same problem.
If none of the developers respond, this should
become a bug ticket on SourceForge.
Georg
_
View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=10170
__
Hi
There is a peculiar problem with one of my entity beans. It has two fields
bankID and bankname.If I am changing the PK field in PK class from bankID to
bankname and calling a business method. The method is never executed.EJBLoad
is failing and the following message is seen .The database is SQL
Bugs item #525840, was opened at 2002-03-05 01:59
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=525840&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Guy Rouillier (guyr)
Assigned to: Nobody
Will do.
--jason
marc fleury wrote:
>yes I think we need to show the netboot thing. It is under most people's
>radar.
>
>What I would like to do is "adopt a rabbit" directly from our website. So
>they download a small jar (the boot stuff and empty directory structure) and
>then we configure
>
>
>I wonder... db is needed for what?
>log is dependent on your using a file appender for log4j
>our tmp dir might be unnecessary given url deployment. The main reason we
>copy stuff explicitly is for the "can't delete or change an opened jar"
>bug. jar already makes a local (hidden) copy of a
yes I think we need to show the netboot thing. It is under most people's
radar.
What I would like to do is "adopt a rabbit" directly from our website. So
they download a small jar (the boot stuff and empty directory structure) and
then we configure *the smalles server possible* I am thinking ON
On 2002.03.04 23:28:17 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote:
> Aside from some small logging issues as well as some configuration
> changes, the server as is will run from an http:// url (perhaps even
> other protocols, though I have not tested that).
>
> With only bin/run.sh and bin/run.jar, I was able to r
| I wonder if all the jsr-77 mandated behavior can be implemented as an
there is no behavior, just a model, an API (the M-EJB) and some monitoring.
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listin
Bugs item #523239, was opened at 2002-02-27 02:24
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=523239&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marcel Ammerlaan (mam)
Assigned t
Bugs item #525445, was opened at 2002-03-04 10:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=525445&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adrian Brock (ejort)
Assigne
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/04 21:35:37
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment DeploymentInfo.java
MainDeployer.java
Added: src/main/org/jboss/deployment JARDeployer.java
Removed: src/main/org/jboss/deployment MainDeployerMBean.java
Log:
fix for
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/04 21:35:38
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
fix for bug 525445. Added JARDeployer that will only deploy jars or directories
with no WEB-INF directory and no xml files in META-INF. Modified MainDeployer to
require a deployer, and keep a list of package
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/04 21:35:38
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system/server ServerImpl.java
Log:
fix for bug 525445. Added JARDeployer that will only deploy jars or directories
with no WEB-INF directory and no xml files in META-INF. Modified MainDeployer to
require a deploy
The JBoss/Testsuite management tests seem to need a security manager to
work. When run by themselves I get exception like the one below for
most of the tests. When run with the rest of the tests only one
failes... which means that this test is dependent on some other test to
run... which is
On 2002.03.05 00:03:48 -0500 Andreas Schaefer wrote:
> Hi David
>
> > On 2002.03.04 23:10:25 -0500 Andreas Schaefer wrote:
> > > Hi Geeks
> > >
> > > JSR-77 spec. is still changing and therefore a
> > > moving target.
> > >
> > > I think that JSR-77 MBeans should be converted
> > > to Juha's XMBe
Hi David
> On 2002.03.04 23:10:25 -0500 Andreas Schaefer wrote:
> > Hi Geeks
> >
> > JSR-77 spec. is still changing and therefore a
> > moving target.
> >
> > I think that JSR-77 MBeans should be converted
> > to Juha's XMBean. Because I am too lazy to write
> > the deployment descriptors I am go
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 20:56:01
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
o report gen only needs stylesheets, don't attempt to recompile everything
Revision ChangesPath
1.84 +2 -2 jbosstest/build.xml
Index: build.xml
=
On 2002.03.04 23:10:25 -0500 Andreas Schaefer wrote:
> Hi Geeks
>
> JSR-77 spec. is still changing and therefore a
> moving target.
>
> I think that JSR-77 MBeans should be converted
> to Juha's XMBean. Because I am too lazy to write
> the deployment descriptors I am going to use David
> Jencks
Aside from some small logging issues as well as some configuration changes, the server
as is will run from an http:// url (perhaps even other protocols, though I have not
tested that).
With only bin/run.sh and bin/run.jar, I was able to run a modified 'default' server
configuration.
The chang
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 506
Successful tests: 498
Errors:4
Failures: 4
[time of test: 5 March 2002 4:26 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/04 20:22:52
Modified:etc/xdoclet/templates mbean-custom.j
Log:
Fixed a -duh- mistake
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1 tools/etc/xdoclet/templates/mbean-custom.j
Index: mbean-custom.j
=
Hi Geeks
JSR-77 spec. is still changing and therefore a
moving target.
I think that JSR-77 MBeans should be converted
to Juha's XMBean. Because I am too lazy to write
the deployment descriptors I am going to use David
Jencks XDoclet "jbossmx" to generated the XMBean
DDs.
This means that the onl
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 19:46:15
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
o include log4j-debug.properties and log4j-trace.properties in run.jar
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +2 -2 jboss-system/build.xml
Index: build.xml
==
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 19:45:46
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/logging Log4jService.java
Log:
o special handling of file urls, which don't return content type = text/xml
o more trace debugging
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +28 -8 jboss-system/src/main/org/jb
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 506
Successful tests: 498
Errors:4
Failures: 4
[time of test: 5 March 2002 3:39 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 19:32:19
Added: src/resources log4j-debug.properties log4j-trace.properties
Log:
o Adding standard log4j properties for debug and trace (allows you to say
-Dlog4j.configuration=log4j-debug.properties to enable debug on boot)
Revision Chang
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 19:16:04
Modified:jbossbuild.xml
Log:
o Directories will be created if they do not exist (even for log/)
Revision ChangesPath
1.99 +1 -13 build/jboss/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 19:10:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system ServiceController.java
Log:
o don't need this import
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -2 jboss-system/src/main/org/jboss/system/ServiceController.java
Index: ServiceController.java
==
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 19:08:06
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system ServiceController.java
Log:
o Use JMXExceptionDecoder to handle those pesky JMX exceptions
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +21 -88jboss-system/src/main/org/jboss/system/ServiceController.java
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 19:06:57
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment MainDeployer.java
Log:
o do not wrap DeploymentException inside of DeploymentException
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +7 -3 jboss-system/src/main/org/jboss/deployment/MainDeployer.java
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 19:01:02
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system/server ServerImpl.java
Log:
o Using JMXExceptionDecoder
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +8 -41 jboss-system/src/main/org/jboss/system/server/ServerImpl.java
Index: ServerImpl.java
==
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 19:00:31
Modified:src/bin run.bat run.sh
Log:
o jboss.boot.loader.name -> program.name
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +3 -4 jboss-system/src/bin/run.bat
Index: run.bat
===
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 18:59:52
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/util/jmx MBeanProxy.java
Added: src/main/org/jboss/util/jmx JMXExceptionDecoder.java
Log:
o Adding JMXExceptionDecoder to decode/rethrow those pesky JMX exceptions
Revision ChangesPath
1.2
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 506
Successful tests: 498
Errors:4
Failures: 4
[time of test: 5 March 2002 2:46 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 18:43:47
Modified:src/main/org/jboss Main.java
Log:
o Added -P|--properties option to load system properties from the
specified URL
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +23 -3 jboss-system/src/main/org/jboss/Main.java
Index: Main.ja
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 18:34:54
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system/server ServerImpl.java
Log:
o Log boot urls
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +7 -2 jboss-system/src/main/org/jboss/system/server/ServerImpl.java
Index: ServerImpl.java
==
Hi developpers,
I think, I find bug in Jetty. When doing forward request
getRequestDispatcher(target).forward(request, response), appear buG - target receive
old request, i.e. parameters don't adjusted to match the path of the target resource.
With early version of Jetty (with Jboss 3.0.0beta1)
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 506
Successful tests: 498
Errors:4
Failures: 4
[time of test: 5 March 2002 1:45 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 17:18:12
Modified:src/etc/conf/default log4j.xml
Log:
o using file appenders which make directory structure by default
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +3 -3 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/log4j.xml
Index: log4j.xml
==
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 17:16:40
Added: src/main/org/jboss/logging/appender
DailyRollingFileAppender.java FileAppender.java
RollingFileAppender.java package.html
Log:
o Extentions of default Log4j versions which will make the
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 17:16:01
jboss-common/src/main/org/jboss/logging/appender - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 506
Successful tests: 497
Errors:4
Failures: 5
[time of test: 5 March 2002 1:7 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
What project/module did you checkout?
The resource looks like the newer buildmagic, which has not been
commited (to my knowledge) on any projects other than buildmagic.
--jason
Dave Smith wrote:
> How do I guarantee that my rar's that setup my default data source get
> deployed before my EJ
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 16:46:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/logging Log4jService.java
Log:
o forgot to set lastConfigured
o uninstall/reinstall system adapters to avoid loops
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +29 -13jboss-system/src/main/org/jboss/logging/Log
User: user57
Date: 02/03/04 16:38:58
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/logging Log4jService.java
Log:
o Log4j can now be configured/reconfigured from a URL
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +62 -14jboss-system/src/main/org/jboss/logging/Log4jService.java
Index: Log4jS
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 506
Successful tests: 497
Errors:4
Failures: 5
[time of test: 5 March 2002 0:29 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
User: lqd
Date: 02/03/04 15:41:38
Modified:src/lib Tag: Branch_2_4 jbosspool.jar
Log:
sync jbosspool .jar files for release
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.4.8 +497 -379 jboss/src/lib/Attic/jbo
User: lqd
Date: 02/03/04 15:41:39
Modified:src/etc/deploy Tag: Branch_2_4 jbosspool-jdbc.rar
Log:
sync jbosspool .jar files for release
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.4.6 +73 -48jboss/src/et
User: lqd
Date: 02/03/04 15:35:08
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/pool/jdbc/xa Tag: Branch_2_4
XAConnectionFactory.java XAPoolDataSource.java
XAPoolDriver.java
Log:
- more changes from proprietary PrintWriter logging to log4j
- no m
User: lqd
Date: 02/03/04 15:35:08
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/pool/jdbc Tag: Branch_2_4
JDBCConnectionFactory.java JDBCPoolDataSource.java
Log:
- more changes from proprietary PrintWriter logging to log4j
- no more NPE at startup
Revision Changes
User: lqd
Date: 02/03/04 15:35:09
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/pool/jdbc/xa/wrapper Tag: Branch_2_4
XADataSourceImpl.java
Log:
- more changes from proprietary PrintWriter logging to log4j
- no more NPE at startup
Revision ChangesPath
No
I'm losing my mind. I had my email sorted by subject. What a moron, huh?!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:16 PM
> To: Bill Burke; Jboss-Dev
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] alive?
>
>
> Th
User: lqd
Date: 02/03/04 15:16:52
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/pool Tag: Branch_2_4 PoolParameters.java
Log:
- LOGGER_KEY not used anywhere
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.1.1.2.3 +0 -1 jbosspo
There are about 50 emails on the list today...
you can always check online really :)
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
|Burke
|Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:54 PM
|To: Jboss-Dev
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] alive?
|
|
|Just seeing
Just seeing if devlist is alive. Haven't been getting any emails today.
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Bugs item #523969, was opened at 2002-02-28 12:01
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=523969&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Markus Menner (morphace)
>Assig
Bugs item #521558, was opened at 2002-02-22 12:42
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=521558&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Pending
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ignacio Coloma (alu1344)
Assig
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/03/04 14:27:45
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCAbstractQueryCommand.java QueryParameter.java
Log:
Cleaned up typeMapping handling.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +6 -5
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/e
Patches item #525663, was opened at 2002-03-04 14:16
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=525663&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew McCulloch (amccullo)
Assigned
Bugs item #522477, was opened at 2002-02-25 09:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=522477&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas Hamann (thomash76)
Assi
Bugs item #517018, was opened at 2002-02-13 09:26
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=517018&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas Hamann (thomash76)
Assi
Bugs item #517018, was opened at 2002-02-13 16:26
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=517018&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Pending
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas Hamann (thomash76)
Assi
Bugs item #522477, was opened at 2002-02-25 09:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=522477&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Pending
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas Hamann (thomash76)
As
Bugs item #517018, was opened at 2002-02-13 09:26
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=517018&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Pending
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas Hamann (thomash76)
As
Bugs item #516834, was opened at 2002-02-13 02:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=516834&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Assign
On 2002.03.04 17:22:56 -0500 marc fleury wrote:
> In fact david, maybe a transactional approach is the simplest way to do
> it...
>
For us, sure, but despite all they have done I don't think jbossmx is an in
memory object db with tx support yet;-)
> hmmm research for some other version :)
>
y
OK, Thanks, I'll have a look at this later.
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:35:27AM -0800, Scott M Stark wrote:
> Access to the repository is seperate from permissions on the
> JBoss project web site. That is not the cause of the cvs errors.
>
>
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technol
Access to the repository is seperate from permissions on the
JBoss project web site. That is not the cause of the cvs errors.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Neale Swinnerton" <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
I wrote that patch
Now Marc gave me r/w access to CVS last week, Unfortunately I am totally
bogged down with other (non Jboss) stuff at the moment and haven't had chance
to use it to apply my patches, so thanks for jumping in :-)
I want to assign some other patches to myself but I don'
In fact david, maybe a transactional approach is the simplest way to do
it...
hmmm research for some other version :)
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:22 PM
|To: David Jencks; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-d
A deployment exception should clean up all the resources set up.
It seems that since we added the EJB as MBean (i think I did?) we don't
remove it if something goes wrong. We need to centralize these or have the
proper callbacks in the dependents to clean their own stuff.
Deployment should almo
throw a Deployment exception
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain
|Sundstrom
|Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 10:39 AM
|To: JBoss-dev
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] Problem with new deployer
|
|
|I have been working on the XmlFileLoader stu
I noticed that yesterday also. I'll see what I can do. First I'm trying
to fix the deployment order problem, so at least you can start the
server;-)
david jencks
On 2002.03.04 13:38:42 -0500 Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> I have been working on the XmlFileLoader stuff I discussed yesterday and
> i
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/03/04 10:58:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/metadata XmlFileLoader.java
Log:
Will now throw a DeploymentException if an error occures while validating.
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +18 -2 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/metadata/XmlFileLoader.java
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/03/04 10:53:50
Modified:src/resources/cmp2/ejbselect/META-INF jbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Log:
fixed invalid metadata
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +0 -1
jbosstest/src/resources/cmp2/ejbselect/META-INF/jbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Index: jbosscmp-jdbc.xm
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/03/04 10:53:50
Modified:src/resources/cmp2/readonly/META-INF jbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Log:
fixed invalid metadata
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +2 -4 jbosstest/src/resources/cmp2/readonly/META-INF/jbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Index: jbosscmp-jdbc.xml
I have been working on the XmlFileLoader stuff I discussed yesterday and
it has revealed a problem with the new deployer. When a
DeploymentException is thrown in the create life cycle method the
deployer does not remove the ejbs that were registered a part for
ejb-jar. Then later when you
How do I guarantee that my rar's that setup my default data source get
deployed before my EJB's?
Second un-related point. The current build seems broken I get
./build.sh
Ant version 1.4 compiled on September 3 2001
Searching for build.xml ...
Buildfile: /home/dave/jboss/build/build.xml
Detect
You can detect if a jar is an EJB 2.0 jar by looking at the DOCTYPE. I
already do this in ApplicationMetaData, so all you need to do is call
isEJB2x().
-dain
marc fleury wrote:
> 2.0 is so much more powerful than 1.1 we will support only 2.0 when it is
> stable. For now we need both,
>
> m
2.0 is so much more powerful than 1.1 we will support only 2.0 when it is
stable. For now we need both,
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Adrian Brock
|Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 7:13 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-
Hi,
I'm apply the create patches from sourceforge.
As the patch says the verifier code is incomplete.
The 2.0 verifier does not exist, the patch allows
create for 1.1
I was wondering, do we need to support both 1.1 and
2.0 in the container as well? The spec suggests
we should for at least CMP. I
Bugs item #525445, was opened at 2002-03-04 10:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=525445&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adrian Brock (ejort)
>Assigned to
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/04 05:25:09
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/cmr/ejb CMRBugBean.java
Log:
Fixed xdoclet markup to avoid generating relationship key-fields tags. Requires
xdoclet 1.1.2, coming soon
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -2 jbosstest/src/m
Hi
I am using loadrunner to perform a load testing in my application. But as I
increases the number of users(say to 5) , the server gets hanged or becomes
very slow and all the test gets failed giving the reason " time out
reached".
I have set a large value for the parameter
320. Still the
Bugs item #523305, was opened at 2002-02-27 09:34
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=523305&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas Hamann (thomash76)
Assig
Bugs item #525445, was opened at 2002-03-04 10:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=525445&group_id=22866
Category: Build System
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adrian Brock (ejort)
Assigned to
Bugs item #525445, was opened at 2002-03-04 10:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=525445&group_id=22866
>Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adrian Brock (ejort)
>Assigned t
Bugs item #523305, was opened at 2002-02-27 10:34
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=523305&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas Hamann (thomash76)
Assig
It depends on the quality of the JDBC driver and the type of database.
>From my experience with using Sun's JDBC-ODBC bridge to read MS Access files
(kind of worst case) you can expect any amount of things that are not
working.
Although it seems much improved with JDK1.4 and Access2000.
So what
Bugs item #517018, was opened at 2002-02-13 16:26
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=517018&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas Hamann (thomash76)
Assign
90 matches
Mail list logo
