Patches item #608221, was opened at 2002-09-12 16:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=608221group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to:
The same problem using build.sh under Win2K with cygwin.
Could someone clean successfully under windows 2000?
Thanks.
alex
Wednesday, September 11, 2002, 8:27:30 PM, you wrote:
AL Hello David,
AL Wednesday, September 11, 2002, 8:00:25 PM, you wrote:
DJ Maybe this is a windows only problem?
Excellent stuff Bill!
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi, 12 septembre 2002 06:17
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-608189 ] Entity Lock Monitor
added
Change Notes
Bugs item #582428, was opened at 2002-07-16 22:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=582428group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Lau (andrewlau4)
Assigned
Bugs item #582428, was opened at 2002-07-16 22:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=582428group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Lau (andrewlau4)
Assigned
I saw the NPE while testing the 3.0.2 bundle. It was caused by the
EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSX registering as a war deployer before
it was fully started. This has been fixed in all branches.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Bugs item #582428, was opened at 2002-07-16 22:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=582428group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Lau (andrewlau4)
Assigned
Thanks scott,
That saves me a lot of headaches ;-)
CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2002 11:36
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net now supports Axis RC1
I saw the NPE while testing
Bugs item #575307, was opened at 2002-06-29 00:57
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=575307group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 9
Submitted By: T. Subramanian (t_subbu)
Number of tests run: 934
Successful tests: 924
Errors:4
Failures: 6
[time of test: 12 September 2002 5:50 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer,
Bugs item #608412, was opened at 2002-09-12 09:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608412group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
Hi,
when converting some old adapters I had finally the chance to look at
the new JAAS based autentication stuff for JCA adapters. Really neat.
But one thing is somewhat iritating. It is not possible to configure a
new adapter and hot deploy it. At least I could not figure out a
standard way of
There is a service that does this in the testsuite. XMLLoginConfigs chain so
that multiple configs can be active.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Peter Antman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Hello, guys!
David and Dain, I guess, you are the persons who can help me here.
Currently, I am writting CMP code that supports db-vendor specific
API. I need to cast PreparedStatement/Statement to vendor specific
ones. So, the statements need to be casted to WrappedStatement first
and then
Bugs item #608458, was opened at 2002-09-12 18:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608458group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #607684, was opened at 2002-09-11 09:07
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=607684group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Remind
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Alex Loubyansky wrote:
But I have a couple of questions.
1. the wrapping classes are in local-ra-jdbc-libs.jar. I need this
jar in the classpath during compilation. According to recent
buildfragments changes, what is the right place to add in the
classpath: modules.ent or build.xml?
On 2002.09.12 12:24:19 -0400 Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Alex Loubyansky wrote:
But I have a couple of questions.
1. the wrapping classes are in local-ra-jdbc-libs.jar. I need this
jar in the classpath during compilation. According to recent
buildfragments changes, what is the right
David Jencks wrote:
Maybe Jason has an idea. I guess we can do this with postgres and mysql,
but how about Oracle etc? is this legal?
Yes. We will not be redistributing the driver with out application
server. It will simply be available to internal developers of JBoss
(this is a technical
Bugs item #491536, was opened at 2001-12-11 06:57
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=491536group_id=22866
Category: JAWS (inactive)
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 1
Submitted By: Vincent Harcq (vharcq)
Bugs item #504246, was opened at 2002-01-16 01:52
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=504246group_id=22866
Category: JAWS (inactive)
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 1
Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus)
Ok
just had an interesting IM with hiram. He essentially has implemented
the proxy factory we were talking about. I think he is missing the
client/server side of it but we can very simply add these.
Essentially it would revolve around a central
proxyFactory.createProxy(Interfaces[],
Has anyone tried running the minimal target built from CVS Branch_3_2?
I tried it and get the following:
===
.
JBoss Bootstrap Environment
.
JBOSS_HOME: c:\java\jboss-3.2.0RC1\bin\\..
.
JAVA:
Bugs item #554437, was opened at 2002-05-10 03:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=554437group_id=22866
Category: JAWS (inactive)
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 1
Submitted By: Paul Nicklin (paulnicklin)
Bugs item #521108, was opened at 2002-02-21 12:38
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=521108group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ilya Perminov (iperminov)
Bugs item #573828, was opened at 2002-06-25 16:33
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=573828group_id=22866
Category: JAWS (inactive)
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 1
Submitted By: Markus Kling (mkling)
Bugs item #576479, was opened at 2002-07-02 11:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=576479group_id=22866
Category: JAWS (inactive)
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 1
Submitted By: Bani Greyling (banigreyling)
Bugs item #580484, was opened at 2002-07-12 04:03
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=580484group_id=22866
Category: JAWS (inactive)
Group: v2.4 BETA (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 1
Submitted By: Geert Poels (geertpoels)
Bugs item #604950, was opened at 2002-09-05 03:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=604950group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Franco Biaggi (fbiaggi)
Assigned to: David Jencks
Bugs item #605041, was opened at 2002-09-05 08:02
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=605041group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Timo Warns (timow)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #606812, was opened at 2002-09-09 11:32
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=606812group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Da C (dacu)
Assigned to: Dain
Bugs item #608202, was opened at 2002-09-12 00:30
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608202group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Cory Prowse (cosmic)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #607213, was opened at 2002-09-10 04:11
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=607213group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: vishal (attachvishal)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #559232, was opened at 2002-05-22 10:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=559232group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rik de Groot (synotix)
Assigned to: Dain
Bugs item #562004, was opened at 2002-05-29 13:11
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=562004group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Justin Casp (jcasp)
Assigned to: Dain
Bugs item #550606, was opened at 2002-04-30 08:00
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=550606group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Daniel Moos (moosi_1978)
Assigned to: Dain
Bugs item #572281, was opened at 2002-06-21 15:46
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=572281group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Colin Li (colinl)
Assigned to: Dain
Bugs item #437043, was opened at 2001-06-28 06:47
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=437043group_id=22866
Category: JAWS (inactive)
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 1
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Bugs item #540049, was opened at 2002-04-05 18:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=540049group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 4
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #591835, was opened at 2002-08-06 20:46
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=591835group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to: Dain
Bugs item #555070, was opened at 2002-05-12 05:49
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=555070group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dylan van Iersel (dviersel)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #571995, was opened at 2002-06-21 02:07
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=571995group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to: Dain
Bugs item #600647, was opened at 2002-08-27 01:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600647group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to: David
Bugs item #600435, was opened at 2002-08-26 15:27
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600435group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kyle Downey (kdowney)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #604916, was opened at 2002-09-05 02:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=604916group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lee Schumacher (lelliot)
Assigned
Bugs item #600647, was opened at 2002-08-27 01:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600647group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #600435, was opened at 2002-08-26 15:27
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600435group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kyle Downey (kdowney)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #484776, was opened at 2001-11-23 02:30
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=484776group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bani Greyling (banigreyling)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #604950, was opened at 2002-09-05 03:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=604950group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Franco Biaggi (fbiaggi)
Assigned to: David Jencks
Bugs item #530039, was opened at 2002-03-14 14:03
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=530039group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: bill (billprogra)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #600647, was opened at 2002-08-27 06:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600647group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to: Jules
Ok I imagine a client invocation chain will look like:
clientproxy - client-interceptor-stack -
serverproxy - server-interceptor-stack - targetMbean
Would doing some think like this satisfy you client-server requirments? :
serverproxy = factory.createAspect(server-interceptor-stack,
Bugs item #600435, was opened at 2002-08-26 20:27
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600435group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kyle Downey (kdowney)
Assigned
I'm a little confused about one part of this...
I thought the plan was to turn our current ejb interceptors into mbean
interceptors and the Containers into fancy MBeanInvokers (If I remember
correctly, anyway the top thing on the mbean interceptor stack). If this
is correct, the
On 12 Sep, Scott M Stark wrote:
There is a service that does this in the testsuite. XMLLoginConfigs chain so
that multiple configs can be active.
Ah, that was a neat one, but one thing I do not get: say the
mysql-service.xml is installed and uses this scheme to install a new
root config with
Ok I imagine a client invocation chain will look like:
clientproxy - client-interceptor-stack -
serverproxy - server-interceptor-stack - targetMbean
not quite there is no typed serverproxy in the middle just a straight
invoke() stack.
The server/client nature just appear do to a
Number of tests run: 934
Successful tests: 924
Errors:4
Failures: 6
[time of test: 12 September 2002 12:44 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer,
Well, add to that: its is somethimes much better to be able to specify
the auth XML in the *-service.xml file and not have to have an external
file to load, this could ofcourse be fixed easilly by letting
XMLLoginConfig also take an Element to be set up from.
//Peter
On 12 Sep, Scott M Stark
Try it again. I fixed it yesterday.
server 688jar -tf output/lib/jboss-minimal.jar | grep invo
org/jboss/invocation/
org/jboss/invocation/http/
org/jboss/invocation/jrmp/
org/jboss/invocation/local/
org/jboss/invocation/Invocation.class
org/jboss/invocation/InvocationContext.class
Bugs item #600647, was opened at 2002-08-27 16:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600647group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned to: Jules
Bugs item #608202, was opened at 2002-09-12 15:30
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608202group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Cory Prowse (cosmic)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #608729, was opened at 2002-09-13 11:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608729group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fui Shien, Choong (fschoong)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #600800, was opened at 2002-08-27 09:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=600800group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Johnson (johnsbrn)
Assigned
Bugs item #608720, was opened at 2002-09-13 13:14
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=608720group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Anthony Ikeda (akikeda)
Assigned
Its more like
DynamicProxy - interceptor stack - Target MBean
There should be no concept of server or client.
I also believe the interceptor chain, Aspect Oriented framework should be a
generic framework and should work with any type of Object. It should be
core to JMX. Sure, the
Number of tests run: 903
Successful tests: 873
Errors:26
Failures: 4
[time of test: 13 September 2002 2:26 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun
Two issues I have with the current javagroups integration is that it
is not configurable via log4j and it does not have enough logging of
events. What can we do to improve this?
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
What is the story with the 3.2 branch? Are we getting ready to release
anytime soon? Or is 3.0.x going to remain mainstream for a while?
--jason
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: [JBoss-dev] configuration of interceptors
I'm a little confused about one part of
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
fleury
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:55 PM
To: 'Hiram Chirino'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FW: [JBoss-dev] configuration of interceptors
Ok I imagine a client invocation chain
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
Burke
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FW: [JBoss-dev] configuration of interceptors
Its more like
DynamicProxy - interceptor
71 matches
Mail list logo
