Bugs item #616546, was opened at 2002-09-30 15:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=616546&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
>Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Schmid (giorgio42)
Assigned to: Nobody
Bugs item #613360, was opened at 2002-09-23 21:00
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=613360&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Assigned to
Bugs item #613349, was opened at 2002-09-23 20:34
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=613349&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom)
Assigned to
Bugs item #594563, was opened at 2002-08-13 05:18
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=594563&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff Miner (jeff_miner)
As
Juha & Group,
> make sure you add the getMethod and setMethod mapping to your MMB
> attributes.
Thanks. I did this and started re-reading your JMX book. I now have a new
error :)
Below, I include my MBean Info generation code, and some error output. When
I try to view the jmx-console page fo
do you have operation info for the operation names you are mapping to
(setId & getId)?
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Matt Munz wrote:
> Juha & Group,
>
> > make sure you add the getMethod and setMethod mapping to your MMB
> > attributes.
>
> Thanks. I did this and started re-reading your JMX book. I n
Thank you, David.
This is exactly the behaviour I am looking for.
David Jencks wrote:
> This is in HEAD and 3.2. Both Local and XAConnectionManagers are wrappers
> around TxConnectionManager. In XA and TxConnectionManager you can set
> TrackConnectionByTx to eliminate all intermediate end(susp
Juha,
> do you have operation info for the operation names you are mapping to
> (setId & getId)?
Nope, and I now see where this causes the problem. At least I'm learning...
Thanks for all the assistance.
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
I'm working on a bug 576410.
The problem is that we need a Set implementation that will order
elements by its addition to the set. I called it SequencedSet.
There are two main approaches: implement it from scratch extending
AbstractSet or on top of something.
I talked with Dain and he advised me
Bugs item #595672, was opened at 2002-08-15 18:28
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=595672&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Wont Fix
>Priority: 8
Submitted By: Boris Tamarkin (upss)
Assigned
Title: FW: [JBoss-dev] XADataSource wrapper for JBoss 4
Hi Igor.
I applied the patch and initially found the
XAResourceTest tests ran successfully a number of times. Ive found that after
running the XAResourceTest, if l leave SQL Server running, stop and start
JBoss and then run the test ag
I suspect this might be a limitation of the current jboss XidFactory...
namely it starts over with global ids every time you restart jboss. If you
leave SQLServer running, it may object if it gets the same xid later on
that it committed earlier. Is there an easy way to see if this is the
problem
No, my entity name is:
http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0.dtd";>
Which I took from a jbosscmp-jdbc.xml from jboss/testsuite.
On the side it would be nice if we had pages on jboss.org which
describes each of our XML documents.
Thanks for checking =]
--jason
> -Original Messa
Number of tests run: 976
Successful tests: 959
Errors:15
Failures: 2
[time of test: 2 October 2002 1:50 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems In
Bugs item #481358, was opened at 2001-11-13 09:07
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=481358&group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Daniel OConnor (docodan)
Assigned to: Andrea
Bugs item #614116, was opened at 2002-09-24 19:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=614116&group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Elias Ross (genman)
Assigned to: Nob
Bugs item #614116, was opened at 2002-09-24 16:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=614116&group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Elias Ross (genman)
Assigned to: Nob
Bugs item #565237, was opened at 2002-06-06 04:31
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=565237&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Coy (scoy)
Assigned t
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Sacha Labourey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just commited a generic cache-invalidation mechansim to HEAD (mainly in
> org.jboss.cache.invalidation). Some of the code and ideas comes from Bill
> Burke's implementation of the Seppuku algorithm that has been recently
> commited.
dr
19 matches
Mail list logo