[JBoss-dev] taming the beast

2002-11-01 Thread Ben Tompkins
First, I'd like to apologize to anyone I may have offended or irritated in recent days. I am not a "whiner" by nature and realize that this is a ***technical*** list. Nor do I intend to organize a "build system revolution" among JBoss contributors, or pollute this list with my personal issues, o

Re: [JBoss-dev] test2...

2002-11-01 Thread Ben Tompkins
Jason, I have submitted the diff "as is" just so I can get it off my desk for the immediate future. Forgot to assign it to you - if that was possible - but most of the patches are assigned to "nobody" anyway. Let me know if this isn't what you want and I will make the changes and resubmit or wh

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-632414 ] Build Faq Update

2002-11-01 Thread noreply
Patches item #632414, was opened at 2002-11-01 22:26 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=632414&group_id=22866 Category: JBossDoc Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ben Tompkins (brtompkins) Assigne

Re: [JBoss-dev] test2...

2002-11-01 Thread Ben Tompkins
Ok - great - but the physics bit (the first, shorter faq that goes on about "cantorian fractal spacetime" is mostly plagiarized from a real paper I found on the net. Do you want we me to cut it, seek permission, or what. I realize that I have created a silly issue - but you never know... On Fr

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-595672 ] Deserialization broken in JBoss 3.01

2002-11-01 Thread noreply
Bugs item #595672, was opened at 2002-08-16 04:28 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=595672&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 8 Submitted By: Boris Tamarkin (upss) Assigned t

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(JBoss_3_0_4) Testsuite Results: 1-November-2002

2002-11-01 Thread scott . stark
Number of tests run: 988 Successful tests: 986 Errors:1 Failures: 1 [time of test: 1 November 2002 15:7 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.] [

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-620838 ] jboss-3.0.3 Crashes with jdk1.4.1

2002-11-01 Thread noreply
Bugs item #620838, was opened at 2002-10-09 11:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=620838&group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jay Petersen (s2jcpete) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymou

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-632328 ] Typos in JBoss Clustering Manual

2002-11-01 Thread noreply
Bugs item #632328, was opened at 2002-11-01 17:44 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=632328&group_id=22866 Category: JBossDoc Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 3 Submitted By: Fred Hartman (fredh666) Assigned to

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-632313 ] Typos in JBoss Clustering Manual

2002-11-01 Thread noreply
Bugs item #632313, was opened at 2002-11-01 17:20 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=632313&group_id=22866 Category: JBossDoc Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole >Status: Deleted >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fred Hartman (fredh666) As

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-632328 ] Typos in JBoss Clustering Manual

2002-11-01 Thread noreply
Bugs item #632328, was opened at 2002-11-01 17:44 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=632328&group_id=22866 Category: JBossDoc Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fred Hartman (fredh666) Assigned to:

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.2 problem with trackConnectionByTx and jdbc xa datasources

2002-11-01 Thread David Jencks
1. I see the problem with the old xa wrapper. 2. I will look at this further later. 3. I think your proposal will break the local tx behavior (maybe I didn't look far enough, I have to run) 4. Won't the new xa wrapper in jboss 4 also solve the problem by always using the same Connection from the

RE: [JBoss-dev] Where Have All The Great Development Discussions Gone?

2002-11-01 Thread Bill Burke
We will be expanding the forums shortlyDiscussion will be organized there. Aspect Oriented Programming is already there. Bill > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:jboss-development-admin@;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Scott > M Stark > Sent: Friday, November

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-632313 ] Typos in JBoss Clustering Manual

2002-11-01 Thread noreply
Bugs item #632313, was opened at 2002-11-01 17:20 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=632313&group_id=22866 Category: JBossDoc Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fred Hartman (fredh666) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] test2...

2002-11-01 Thread Jason Dillon
This is funny, funny shit. Submit a real patch (ala sf.net w/attached file) and I will commit this. --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-632297 ] J2EEServer & JVM have hardcoded values

2002-11-01 Thread noreply
Patches item #632297, was opened at 2002-11-01 16:29 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=632297&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nicolas Fournier (nicfournier)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-632294 ] J2EEServer & JVM have hardcoded values

2002-11-01 Thread noreply
Patches item #632294, was opened at 2002-11-01 16:28 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=632294&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nicolas Fournier (nicfournier)

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-595672 ] Deserialization broken in JBoss 3.01

2002-11-01 Thread noreply
Bugs item #595672, was opened at 2002-08-15 18:28 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=595672&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 8 Submitted By: Boris Tamarkin (upss) Assigned t

Re: [JBoss-dev] Where Have All The Great Development Discussions Gone?

2002-11-01 Thread Scott M Stark
Calm before the storm. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: "Hunter Hillegas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "JBoss Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 8:54 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev]

RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net and performance tuning

2002-11-01 Thread Matt Munz
hi again, Anybody out there working on or using JBoss.net? Attached are some files I'm using to test, in a very simplistic way, the performance of jmx.net. My current timing so far is on average .3 seconds to complete the simplest possible transaction (as far as I can tell) -- returning a

[JBoss-dev] Where Have All The Great Development Discussions Gone?

2002-11-01 Thread Hunter Hillegas
Are you guys all hanging out on the private JBossGroup list? I miss the pre-3.0 development discussions about the future of JBoss... There were some great ideas and raging battles... They don't seem to have shifted to the forums, so I was wondering if there is some other public place they are goi

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.2 problem with trackConnectionByTx and jdbcxa datasources

2002-11-01 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Ok, here is the same example with some more details/comments. There was a mistake in my original explanation and I apoligize for confusion. BeanA allocates a connection - TxConnectionManager.getManagedConnection allocates new managed connection mc1 of type org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdb

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-600150 ] Branch 3.2 and minimal not working

2002-11-01 Thread noreply
Bugs item #600150, was opened at 2002-08-26 04:40 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=600150&group_id=22866 Category: Build System Group: v3.2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lennart Petersson (lepe) >Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-600161 ] Branch 3.2 and minimal not working

2002-11-01 Thread noreply
Bugs item #600161, was opened at 2002-08-26 05:12 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=600161&group_id=22866 Category: Build System Group: v3.2 >Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lennart Petersson (lepe) Assigned to

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-562972 ] Error in PortableRemoteObject.narrow()

2002-11-01 Thread noreply
Bugs item #562972, was opened at 2002-05-31 18:30 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=562972&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 1 Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak) As

RE: [JBoss-dev] janitorial work

2002-11-01 Thread Matt Munz
Ben, sorry about the misread. - Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-development-admin@;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Ben Tompkins Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 5:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] janitorial work Perhaps I worded

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.2 problem with trackConnectionByTx and jdbc xa datasources

2002-11-01 Thread David Jencks
I don't understand. Can you repeat your explanation of the problem clearly indicating what is a ManagedConnection and what is a Connection? From your description it looks like perhaps the problem is that we are reusing the java.sql.Connection obtained from a XAConnection? This would not be a pro

The documentation patch is in Re: [JBoss-dev] test2

2002-11-01 Thread Ben Tompkins
This page has been intentionally left blank. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en __

Re: [JBoss-dev] test2

2002-11-01 Thread Ben Tompkins
For some reason I can only send short messages. This is weird. I am thoroughly fed up with Ximian and KMail. So you only get the diff now. --- buildsystem-faq.jsp 2002-10-31 19:02:28.0 -0500 +++ buildsystem-faq-1.jsp 2002-11-01 05:44:12.0 -0500 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ you beli

[JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.2 problem with trackConnectionByTx and jdbc xa datasources

2002-11-01 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Hi, There is a problem with trackConnectionByTx in the current CVS version of JBoss 3.2 which occurs when two beans access the same datasource from the same transaction. I am not 100% sure about original implementation intends and would like to give others an opportunity to complain before I che

[JBoss-dev] test2

2002-11-01 Thread Ben Tompkins
test2 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mai

[JBoss-dev] test

2002-11-01 Thread Ben Tompkins
test --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mail