There sure is a problem with the homepage if you want to reach
non-developers - you know... those people earning more but doing less :)
I get that response a lot of time from our marketing/salesman/bla bla
bla people that they don't get what it really is from reading the
homepage... Sure a lot
we need to start pushing a lot of things from the homepage. I need to
rethink a lot of the website. I want the developemnt to move there and
our communication about the features to be clear on that website.
We kick ass and we need to say it to the world.
netboot has been there for about a year
I am using JBOSS 3.0.4 to send email,
i configured on mail-service.xml and fill with my SMTP Infomation as
follow:
java:/Mail
myusername
mypassword
and also I have configured in my MailerBean to
It is a system monitoring tool: http://bb4.com
--jason
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 06:08 AM, Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI
Serviços wrote:
what woul'd be the BigBrother, is it that reality show : ))?
Jason Dillon wrote:
Someone should write a Big Brother clone using JBoss technologies.
Go for it! Let me know how long you think it will take and if you need
any help.
--jason
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 11:52 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I'll give it a shot if you can't find someone who has done the PetStore
before - I'd be taking the intermediate route. I'm assuming most
Prob the most interesting part will be setting it up to work on hsql out
of the box. Should be cool though, not only cause you will be able to
download, hot install, *run* not just an app server (which is impressive
enough), but an entire DBMS and working applications. Mui cool, push
this idea from
Hi,
I think that David Jencks is right here. To me this looks
like a bug in the Informix driver - as if it assumes
that all resources are Informix driver resources.
The reason the proposed patch works in this case
is probably due to the ordering of resource registration
coming from the order of r
Number of tests run: 995
Successful tests: 987
Errors:7
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2002-11-21.11-56 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[java
Bugs item #642078, was opened at 2002-11-21 20:07
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=642078&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jay Petersen (s2jcpete)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymou
Bugs item #634362, was opened at 2002-11-06 11:55
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=634362&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Michael Lipp (mlipp)
Assigned to: Dav
I'll give it a shot if you can't find someone who has done the PetStore
before - I'd be taking the intermediate route. I'm assuming most of the
effort here is deploying it to JBoss and configuring the necessary
resources.
Jeremy
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EM
Bugs item #641997, was opened at 2002-11-21 12:49
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=641997&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Chris Bonham (bonhamcm)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anon
It's important to remember that the jetty nio implementation
is not so much aimed at increasing socket performance - rather it's
aim is to reduce the number of threads required by avoiding
allocating threads to idle connections.
This is more to avoid problems on operating systems that become
unds
On 21 Nov, Scott M Stark wrote:
> I'll look into what the issues are with building under 1.4 and running with 1.3.
>This should
> be possible and is something we need to work towards.
Great. As for the jaas stuff, I do think that it does not matter if the
1.3 jaas stuff is also build when buildin
Anything is possible. Anyway, the standard Listener works fine in 1.4
and Greg has chosen to keep it on as the default and make a special case
of the NIO Listener which, whilst giving better throughput at high
volumes may actually be slower at low ones. I would rather stick with
standard Jetty'
Jules,
Um... I hate to say this, but I think Weblogic works around this - it
defaults to nio and backs off to its older non-nio.. They used to call
it their "performance pack" before 1.4, and have since just swapped
theirs for nio I think..
You said it was a static config, but I don't see why yo
what woul'd be the BigBrother, is it that reality show : ))?
Jason Dillon wrote:
Someone should write a Big Brother clone using JBoss technologies. BB
is simple technology, but is way to complex to configure and maintain.
Using JBoss NetBoot it would be trivial to bring up new systems. Using
I'll look into what the issues are with building under 1.4 and running with 1.3. This
should
be possible and is something we need to work towards.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Di
Right, we will always have this problem... is there a solution? I
think we have to tools, basically interfaces and dynamic class loading
ala factories... blah.
--jason
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 04:34 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Peter Fagerlund wrote:
torsdagen den 21 november
Um... so the phrase crack smoker comes to mind... anyone else?
--jason
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 04:24 AM, Peter Fagerlund wrote:
Fuck... how can we make one build work for both?
Use a runtime switch ...
in a preprocessor ala xDoclet ?
Peter Fagerlund wrote:
torsdagen den 21 november 2002 kl 11.46 skrev Jason Dillon:
Fuck... how can we make one build work for both?
Use a runtime switch ...
1. Jetty's config is static - I could work around it
2. You would need to build to the LCD (1.3) and then do another build
for opti
Fuck... how can we make one build work for both?
Use a runtime switch ...
in a preprocessor ala xDoclet ?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
Um ya, but how... if the JVM can not handle it then an app level system
must be in place to load the version specific instance based on thr
current JV<.
Surely someone else has run into this problem and found a usable
solution to it... anyone know?
Or perhaps we are doomed to build for 1.3 and
torsdagen den 21 november 2002 kl 11.46 skrev Jason Dillon:
Fuck... how can we make one build work for both?
Use a runtime switch ...
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
Fuck... how can we make one build work for both?
--jason
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 02:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Nov, Jason Dillon wrote:
Bah... this sucks. Can't we get one build to function for both? Or
do
we have to build a 1.3 and 1.4 version? Blah :(
Its the s
Jason Dillon wrote:
The point is that you can't build OR run the NIO Listener under 1.3,
since it uses stuff that doesn't appear until 1.4, so until JBoss moves
to JVM>=1.4, it will have to remain commented out.
As for the AJP Listener, this is shipped uncommented, isn't it?
Jules
Wait, do y
On 21 Nov, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Bah... this sucks. Can't we get one build to function for both? Or do
> we have to build a 1.3 and 1.4 version? Blah :(
Its the same for jaas. A version build för 1.4 will NOT work on 1.3,
because the JAAS classes will be missing!
//Peter
>
> A side note, an
Someone should write a Big Brother clone using JBoss technologies. BB
is simple technology, but is way to complex to configure and maintain.
Using JBoss NetBoot it would be trivial to bring up new systems. Using
J2EE technologies it would be trivial to setup the configuration data
model and
Wait, do you mean that if built with 1.4 that it will function, and
that 1.3 will behave.
I think we need to get the system in such a state that we can build
with the latest supported VM and produce a binary compatible with older
releases... not sure what the details are involved though.
Ba
Bah... this sucks. Can't we get one build to function for both? Or do
we have to build a 1.3 and 1.4 version? Blah :(
A side note, any reason why we do not start the nio and ajp (or
whatever it is called) by default, then let users remove or uncomment
to disabled. This might help catch s
Anyone want to make a NetBoot configuration which runs the latest
PetStore from SUN? I have been meaning to do this for awhile, but
never seem to find the time. This is a simple task for someone who has
setup the PetStore in JBoss 3.x before, or an intermediate task for
someone who is looking
Jason Dillon wrote:
Looks like the Jetty NIO listener for JBoss 3.0.4 does not work out of
the box (ie. simply uncommenting the nio listener def).
--jason
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkg
Bugs item #641740, was opened at 2002-11-21 12:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=641740&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Vladimir Korenev (vkorenev)
Assig
Bugs item #641740, was opened at 2002-11-21 12:37
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=641740&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Vladimir Korenev (vkorenev)
Assig
Looks like the Jetty NIO listener for JBoss 3.0.4 does not work out of
the box (ie. simply uncommenting the nio listener def).
--jason
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
35 matches
Mail list logo
