=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.1_06"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar
Plus, it is ... a spec requirement!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bill Burke
> Sent: vendredi, 28. février 2003 01:13
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] TxInterceptor split is still the
> best thing since slice
Hi Peter,
You shamed me into testing my alternate implementation
of the RMI adaptor, which is now committed in 3.2
This implementation uses the jboss invokers with
late de-marshalling so it can be performed with the
correct classloader.
The three config parameters are
JNDIName - for binding the p
WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE YOUR MESSAGE SEEN BY
OVER 15.4 MILLION OPT-IN, TARGETED PROSPECTS WEEKLY?
Below contains all the information you will ever need to market
your product or service on the Internet.
If you have a product, service, or message that you would like to get
out to Thousands, Hu
hmmm ... allow me to namedrop and spread unverified grapewine info here
then ... ThogetherSoft is toying with Eclice as it's runtime framework
in upcoming versions ... or was that before Borland ? ...
PS: Any right made void as this message is transmitted in a reporting
capacity : DS
---
We will eventually be forced to work with non-java clients. The world is
not Java centric. We will eventually work with companies that required a
lot of non-java integration. I've already worked at 2 before JBG.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've had only two customers ask about CORBA support, but only as an
interim solution until the clients can be rewritten. Fortunately both
decided to just port the clients at the same time.
-dain
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 05:04 PM, Luke Taylor wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
Maybe we're co
Bugs item #669112, was opened at 2003-01-16 15:49
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=669112&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
>Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Andrew Everitt (andieveritt)
Assigned to
David Jencks wrote:
Maybe we're confusing 2 issues here:
1. writing a maintainable usable jboss dtm
2. supporting corba etc.
Does anyone actually use CORBA clients agains JBoss - from Java even,
never mind C++.
I can understand the desire to use CORBA the other way - i.e. calling
out to access
Early in 2.x development we had one module, as you seem to be recommending.
Personally I still think we would be developing 2.x level features without
the module structure.
Among the many advantages modules give you are the ability to know where a
feature ends, the ability to easily enforce and d
The reason for all the modules is dependancies. This is why you can
run different deployments of JBoss. If everything were in a single
source tree, it would be almost impossible to run without everything.
-dain
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 04:00 PM, Dave Neuer wrote:
--- Dain Sundstrom
--- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree about the eclipse discussion, but it does
> actually have a point
> for development of the jboss server. It is always a
> pain to get any
> IDE to like our directory layout.
>
> -dain
>
I would go so far as to say that it is a pain
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:49 PM, Brian Repko wrote:
And to the JBoss-dev list - jeez - way to shut down a newbie.
Here is someone in a Microsoft shop bringing in J2EE and
JBoss and not one message was helpful and a couple were downright
mean. "No you are wrong" and "don't post here".
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1049
Successful tests: 1045
Errors:1
Failures: 3
[time of test: 2003-02-27.12-05 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
Feature Requests item #694618, was opened at 2003-02-27 20:59
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=694618&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ken Yee (kenyee)
Assigned to: Nobody/
Richard,
While I've not tried what you are asking about, JBoss (and any J2EE
server) will use a database via JDBC. There are two main JDBC drivers
for MS SQL Server 2000 that I would recommend. One is the DataDirect
JDBC driver (which is resold by Microsoft) and the Sprinta2000 or
Opta2000 drive
force it to use ant to do all compiles? Seems like
that would be best
to solve most problems.
I've been able to get it to run our ant build files
directly. You might have to go into the eclipse
properties and add all the tools/lib/*.jar files to
the ANT runtime classpath.
Do you know if there is
Here is what we could do. The servlet statistics are #number of
operations, mix/Max/TotalTime in miliseconds.
Neither of the operations is unlikely to ever exceed the range of an
integer. Unlike longs, integer assignments are atomic. If we keep the
statistics in a volatile int, we make sure d
Well, if you are willing to shell out some cash, then
you might consider trying webshpere studio. Since
it's built on eclipse, it has all the eclipse goodies
plus a ton of other stuff like a jsp editor.
Regards,
Hiram
--- Aleksandr Shneyderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Hate to say this but
> Hate to say this but netbeans (www.netbeans.org) beats eclipse hands down.
Hate to tell you but that thing is just damn slow.
What amazes me is that no matter how much RAM your
machine has NetBeans is just always hungry for it.
> Does all of the below and lots more. Go take a look at the modu
Thanks,
Looking through the jboss website, cannot find one reference to SQL
Server.
Everything is Unix and Oracle.
Also, looking at the forums, looks like some people have tried it, but
that
it doesn't work that good.
Is Oracle better?
Unfortunately not.
But everything in a production server en
Hello Nick,
NB> Hate to say this but netbeans (www.netbeans.org) beats eclipse hands down.
NB> Does all of the below and lots more. Go take a look at the module selection
NB> at www.netbeans.org/devhome and
NB> http://www.netbeans.org/devhome/modules/by-module.html
NB> There is the full ide and a
This mainling list about the development of the JBoss server. Please,
use the jboss-user mailing list.
-dain
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 10:21 AM, Kristian Köhler wrote:
Hi Richard
Thanks,
Looking through the jboss website, cannot find one reference to
SQL Server.
Everything is Unix an
Hate to say this but netbeans (www.netbeans.org) beats eclipse hands down.
Does all of the below and lots more. Go take a look at the module selection
at www.netbeans.org/devhome and
http://www.netbeans.org/devhome/modules/by-module.html
There is the full ide and a 'platform' version which is the
Hi Richard
> Thanks,
> Looking through the jboss website, cannot find one reference to
> SQL Server.
> Everything is Unix and Oracle.
> Also, looking at the forums, looks like some people have tried
> it, but that
> it doesn't work that good.
For JBoss MS SQL Server is just another Database.
JBos
Thanks,
Looking through the jboss website, cannot find one reference to SQL Server.
Everything is Unix and Oracle.
Also, looking at the forums, looks like some people have tried it, but that
it doesn't work that good.
Is Oracle better?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Kristian Köhler [mailt
That's not true.
JBoss works with MS SQL Server 2000.
Kristian
--
Orientation in Objects GmbH
http://www.oio.de
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Richard
Schultz
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Februar 2003 16:40
An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Betre
Title: Message
New to Jboss and
J2EE, but looks like we will be asked to support an app for our
department.
We are a Microsoft
shop and looking at the JBOSS document - http://www.jboss.org/overview.jsp - it appears that JBOSS only "talks to"
Oracle, DB2 and Postgres and not SQL Server
2000.
A major aspect of Programming is mastering complexity. The human mind
can deal only with something like seven entities at once. An important
means to approach a set of entities that is much larger is
abstraction. A good IDE reduces the amount of swapping between levels
of abstraction tremendously w
Hi,
I am experiencing some trouble with remote MBean calls (with RMIAdaptor)
to MBean loaded in a scoped deployment. Does any one know any way of
setting the context class loader that RMI uses when doing its
RMIClassLoading stuff. For jrmp ejb calls this works fine since the
invocation is detyped
Stefan Reich wrote:
I tested JSR-77 support in 3.2 and noticed the following issues:
* EntityBeanStatsImpl: PooledCount shows up always as zero
* JTAStatsImpl: results are always zero because the
TranactionManagerService doesn't register itself as an MBean
* JCAConnectionPoolStatsImpl: WaitingTh
《全国网络系统集成方案集》 + 最新PHP，ASP，JAVA、VB、PB、DELPHI、VC 源码系列光盘
本集收录了全国各地大量网络系统和系统集成方面的资料、方案、规划、技术、解决方案等等珍贵材料！内容涉及包括政府、校园、广电、金融、电子商务、税务、社保、宽带网、智能小区等十多个行业！！！绝对是个人网络技术爱好者、系统集成行业等不可多得的宝贵参考资料！！！
具体详情请点击这里
系统集成光盘目录 售价250圆
1、宽带网城域网---11篇
2、电子
> Automatically is what I meant.
I'm just learning the internals of eclipse but I don't
think this should be too hard to add. Create a builder,
a wizard, some property pages etc. and you're off.
I could have a go at doing this in a few weeks, once I've
got some others things working. I'll forwa
Bugs item #694250, was opened at 2003-02-27 11:26
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=694250&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Derar Bakr (dbakr)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
34 matches
Mail list logo
