===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Hello Michael,
Friday, July 11, 2003, 12:00:32 AM, MNewcomb MNewcomb wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Newcomb, Michael P.
So, what do we do about it? Should
JDBCGetGeneratedKeysCreateCommand test for Number and convert
to expected type? Or should we urge MySQL to create the
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Hi all,
Do you know which ports does JBoss 3.2.1 use ? I want to know all ports it
uses, because I aware I defined some ports' number conflicting to JBoss...
with best wishes
Zheng Sun
_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Bugs item #763905, was opened at 2003-07-01 17:04
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mdragan
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=763905group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
I have made the changes as agreed:
+ both war deployer and ejb deployer to examine ejb-link first for
both ejb-ref and ejb-local-ref.
+ war deployer to have a switch LenientEjbLink allowing
misconfigured ejb-links to be ignored for backward
compatibility. This is set to false by default,
I'm happy to announce the opening of jbossdev.webmethods.com. We want to
provide a resource for information on the JBoss testsuite, what kind of
results or errors you might expect on various OS and JVM combinations. It
is primed with a collection of result sets from 7 operating systems. If the
This is a re-post as I didn't see this echo on the list.
Jan
Original Message
I have made the changes as agreed:
+ both war deployer and ejb deployer to examine ejb-link first for
both ejb-ref and ejb-local-ref.
+ war deployer to have a switch LenientEjbLink allowing
You are correct! :( Looks like an example of Murphy's Law in action! It
works during weeks of preparation and fails when I send out the notice!
-Original Message-
From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
I saw the last one.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jan
Bartel
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [JBoss-dev] Handling of ejb-ref and ejb-local-ref]
This is a re-post as I didn't see this
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
We will be working with webm and ROB to include these reports on the
www.jboss.org to aggregate all of our platform builds. Stay tuned as we
work out the kinks. Yes murphy's law second addendum is that it always
raises its ugly head at the worst possible moment.
Thanks for your patience, it is
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [jos-general] Re: [jdistro-devel] Where do we go ?
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 18:46:59 -0400
From: Gilbert Carl Herschberger II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Christian Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 11:29 PM 7/2/03 +0200, you wrote:
At first, one question:
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Java Distribution
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:28:34 -0400
From: Gilbert Carl Herschberger II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Christian Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been wondering about making Java-based technology easier to
distribute. So, I reviewed
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [jos-general] Re: [jdistro-devel] Where do we go ?
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 14:46:49 -0400
From: Gilbert Carl Herschberger II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Christian Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is rare and precious to find someone capable of bringing
Hi,
after some time for reflection and investigation, I forward you 5 mails
(read them or ignore them):
1st mail: Gilbert suggests a united development platform as new project
and offers to give more information about the success/ failures in JOS
as well as support for application programmers
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Java Distribution
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:30:41 +0200
From: Christian Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
we are a number of Java-based projects:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/jos/ (OS)
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [jos-general] Re: [jdistro-devel] Where do we go ?
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 23:29:53 +0200
From: Christian Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gilbert Carl Herschberger II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is rare and precious to find someone capable of bringing
Hi All,
We
are using JBOSS as appserver
We have placed metadata
in cache using Hash Map and
loading it when server is started.
Cache is
working fine for one hour . Problem is
after sometime like 1hr,2hr inconsistently when we try
to use
cached object from Hash Map it is
do you synchronize access to your hashmap ?
like cache = Collections.synchronizedMap(new HashMap());
Hello Suneetha,
Friday, July 11, 2003, 5:25:14 PM, you wrote:
KS Hi All,
KS We are using JBOSS as appserver
KS We have placed metadata in cache using Hash Map and loading it when
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Bugs item #769731, was opened at 2003-07-11 09:13
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=769731group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Title: RE: [JBoss-dev] jobs
Hi Julien,
Thanks for response .Let me try that and get back to you.
Regards!
Sunny
-Original Message-
From: julien viet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Kurakula, Suneetha
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jobs
do you
Ok, your access is restored. Please make sure there are tests added to
the
following unit tests to cover these changes:
testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/naming/test/EjbLinkUnitTestCase.java
testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/web/servlets/ENCServlet.java
Hiram, no one sits around for months without interacting with the day
to day developers of JBoss
Group and then decides to commit a large change without it being
discussed. Some of
what you have most likely has merit but it has to be reviewed so either
submit it as a patch
or commit it to a
Bugs item #725066, was opened at 2003-04-21 18:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lafr
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=725066group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
The whole service life-cycle, deployer, dependency management layer
needs to
be rethought to come up with a more coherent behavior. Right now there
are too
many ways a collection of components can be brought into the server and
insufficient
knowledge of how this was done to allow
Title: Operation Indo Freedom
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
Title: RE: [JBoss-dev] jobs
Hi Julien Others,
We are already schronizing Map in Cache . But it didn't help
Please give me some more ideas in solving below problem.
Thanks,
Sunny
-Original Message-
From: julien viet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003
Title: Message
sunny
do me a favor, either post to forums for user help or take out a contract for
direct developer support.
Asking
for user help on the dev list is not appropriate,
sorry,
marcf
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 01:29 PM, Scott M Stark wrote:
The whole service life-cycle, deployer, dependency management layer
needs to
be rethought to come up with a more coherent behavior. Right now there
are too
many ways a collection of components can be brought into the server
and
The change is too big for a patch. I'd rather commit on a branch.
Another option is to refactor it some more so that it becomes part of
the new module that Nathan is working on. Either way, please let me
know which way you prefer it. I have completed most of my clean up and
the jms and mdb
Bugs item #768635, was opened at 2003-07-09 11:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=768635group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Out of Date
Bugs item #769840, was opened at 2003-07-11 13:11
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=769840group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
I prefer it be commit on a branch.
Thanks,
Nathan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram Chirino
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Jeremy
Boynes
Subject: Re: c/s JBossMQ status,
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
3. [ jboss-Bugs-769469 ] Failed to run JSF EA4
jsf-demo.war (SourceForge.net)
I get the same error. I'll grab the source for
3.2.2RC1 and see what the jboss-ant stuff is doing.
Steve
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
42 matches
Mail list logo
