I agree with no ports being inherently "safer" than others... I myself was wary
at first that this RFC was trying to implement a "security through obscurity"
process. After trying to understand the practical use of running 2 SMTP servers
with different functions and on different ports I came to
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-7?page=comments#action_12316214
]
Andrew Oliver commented on JBMAIL-7:
Sure. I'll put a follow on for a later milestone. JB's JACC implementation
seems to be a bit of a moving target ATM. Moreover, we'l
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-7?page=comments#action_12316213
]
Ivelin Ivanov commented on JBMAIL-7:
When JACC is enabled (J2EE 1.4) it should be preferred to JAAS.
> add a JAASUserRepository and support for JAAS-based security
>
The schema for the property element should also support an xsd:any extension
type so that one is not constrained to simple constructs. For example, I can
use mulitple namespaces to introduce custom types that are marshalled with
either jbossxb or jaxb:
|
|
|
|
JBoss Remoting is built into JBoss AS (at least the newer versions), so will be
there by default, so won't have to worry about plugging it in. My guess is
that JBoss Remoting will be faster than JXTA for typical invocations (based on
most JXTA implementations being XML based). I feel confident
Also, why not just borrow from the spring property model:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are building an application that needs to share data between multiple JBoss
servers. The original system architect, who has since left the project,
suggested using the JXTA P2P stack for sending messages and objects between
servers. Well, I'm not really fond of the way JXTA was plugged into J
Does this support nested java beans, or is that the Beans as values item? Also,
what about custom object factories based on namespaces? This is an example from
head I'm working on for the legacy service descritpor:
|
|
| ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050316232818Lbuild.887
BUILD COMPLETE - build.887Date of build: 03/16/2005 23:28:18Time to build: 18 minutes 41 secondsLast changed: 03/16/2005 23:22:45Last log entry: JBREM-83 - changed so
Hey Tom, that was pretty quick. Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Francisco
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870489#3870489
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870489
-
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-83?page=history ]
Tom Elrod resolved JBREM-83:
-
Resolution: Done
Updated the InvocationMarshaller so will allow for non org.jboss.Invocation
payloads. Should be able to send any Serialiable payloads and respo
Have made the change so InvocationMarshaller/InvocationUnMarshaller will
support standard (non org.jboss.Invocation) payloads. So should be able to use
the datatype=invocation for any Serializable payloads (see jira issue JBREM-83).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?modu
sorry, garbled...
> JBoss 4.0.0?with jboss-cache.jar of JBossCache1.2.1?
JBoss 4.0.0 with jboss-cache.jar of JBossCache1.2.1
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870485#3870485
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=pos
Hi,
I put jboss-cache.jar of JBossCache1.2.1 into JBoss4.0.0. And I tested a
web-application in the JBoss with heavy load.
environment:
Redhat Enterprise 3.0
JDK 1.4.2
JBoss 4.0.0?with jboss-cache.jar of JBossCache1.2.1?
2 node cluster
load-balanced by Apache2+mod_jk2
http session replication en
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050316220053Lbuild.886
BUILD COMPLETE - build.886Date of build: 03/16/2005 22:00:53Time to build: 23 minutes 36 secondsLast changed: 03/16/2005 19:46:20Last log entry: - Update to Tomcat CVS
Basic IMAP support
--
Key: JBMAIL-41
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-41
Project: JBoss Mail
Type: Feature Request
Versions: 1.0-M4
Reporter: Andrew Oliver
Assigned to: Andrew Oliver
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 1.0-M
Support Virtual Host/Domains
Key: JBMAIL-40
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-40
Project: JBoss Mail
Type: Feature Request
Components: SMTP, POP, Security
Reporter: Andrew Oliver
Assigned to: Andrew Oliver
Fix F
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20050316212115Lbuild.439
BUILD COMPLETE - build.439Date of build: 03/16/2005 21:21:15Time to build: 22 minutes 21 secondsLast changed: 03/16/2005 19:41:41Last log entry: - Update to Tomcat CVS
Next monday after this one (or possible the weekend before), I plan to put out
a m3-pre1 release.
This will be a bit different than previous pre releases because we still
haven't realized the bulk of M3 features and I don't intend to branch yet. We
are however close to two of the most import
So feature complete in SMTP is a loaded term. Does that mean there won't be
features that affect SMTP in the future? No (Never will reach that level of
"feature complete"). I mean that we'll be able to run feasibly in a secure
multi-user environment. There are presently issues that would all
I am new to JBoss and hence to the Mail project as well. I have run through the
process of downloading the source, building, etc... and have a couple
questions/suggestions:
- Based on the milestones, M3 will have SMTP feature complete... are there any
plans to allow for RFC 2476 implementation?
Isolation level will take care of the node locking for you. That's the whole
idea actually.
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870476#3870476
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870476
--
The module name is jboss-test, I believe. But if you want to run the testsuite,
you can check out the whole jboss-head using anonymous cvs.
We are in the process getting the tutorial updated. So thanks for the
suggestion.
However, your bind_addr problem works for most of the machines, actually
To answer some of your questions:
1. Yes. You will need to specifically do a put whenever your object has been
modified.
2. Replication takes place for the whole myVector in your case.
(This is where TreeCacheAop comes where you can do fine-grain replication.)
3. SFSN will manage the state cha
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050316185626Lbuild.885
BUILD COMPLETE - build.885Date of build: 03/16/2005 18:56:26Time to build: 39 minutes 14 secondsLast changed: 03/16/2005 18:04:14Last log entry: Remove the commented o
Ok, so now that I have successfully implemented a plain JBossCache within JBoss
3.2.6, I have some basic, performance related questions.
1. In the plain JBossCache, it looks like I need to do a put everytime after an
object is changed. Is that right? For example, if I have a vector assigned as
v
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1512?page=history ]
Scott M Stark closed JBAS-1512:
---
Resolution: Done
Fix Version: JBossAS-4.0.2 Final
These classes are gone in the 4.0.2 release. Spelng muns noting to ma in gnrl.
> misspelling of User
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1555?page=history ]
Scott M Stark reassigned JBAS-1555:
---
Assign To: Scott M Stark
> HTTP Status 403 on using org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.JaccAuthorizationRealm
> --
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1590?page=history ]
Scott M Stark updated JBAS-1590:
Assign To: Scott M Stark
Fix Version: JBossAS-4.0.2 Final
JBossAS-5.0 Alpha
> Container does not call commit or refresh for the JACC prov
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1592?page=history ]
Scott M Stark updated JBAS-1592:
Assign To: Scott M Stark
Component: Web (Tomcat) service
Fix Version: JBossAS-4.0.2 Final
JBossAS-5.0 Alpha
> JaccAuthorizationReal
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1593?page=history ]
Scott M Stark closed JBAS-1593:
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
329678 is the correct uncompressed size:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] console-mgr.sar]$ ls -l
total 1388
-rw-rw-r--1 starksm starksm1412
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1206?page=history ]
Remy Maucherat resolved JBAS-1206:
--
Resolution: Rejected
As with standalone Tomcat, please refer to the URL encoding related attributes
of the connector in Tomcat's documentation.
> UTF
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1516?page=history ]
Remy Maucherat resolved JBAS-1516:
--
Resolution: Done
> Tomcat5: StandardContext getConfigBase tries to create a directory
> ---
What about the access rights? If somebody has write access to it, it has access
to the whole CVS root.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870470#3870470
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=387047
Duplicate Connector shutdown using same server invoker
--
Key: JBREM-84
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-84
Project: JBoss Remoting
Type: Bug
Components: general
Versions: 1.0.1 final
Rep
As discussed on other threads, I also want to have "use case"
configurations that simplify the more long winded bean descriptions.
This will probably require some pluggable xml parsing using namespaces?
e.g. instead of
|
|
| someURL
|
|
|
you could have the equivalen
Known features still not complete (or at least properly tested which
is the same thing in my book :-) are:
1) Specifying types on values, e.g. the elements of a collection
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-29
2) Beans as values
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-28
3) Anno
Although it relatively simple to write your own xml->kernel metadata deployer
I'm interested in any suggestions to make the xml less verbose and more
intuitive.
This xml format will be used by the BeanDeployer
the basic POJO -> jboss deployer
similar to SARDeployer
that does MBean -> jboss deploy
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-82?page=history ]
Tom Elrod closed JBREM-82:
---
Resolution: Done
Fix Version: 1.2.0 beta
Have updated the ObjectName generated for the server invoker to be unique to
the locator uri so that if a new server in
I am new to JBoss and hence to the Mail project as well. I have run through the
process of downloading the source, building, etc... and have a couple
questions/suggestions:
- Based on the milestones, M3 will have SMTP feature complete... are there any
plans to allow for RFC 2476 implementation?
Just to make it more concrete, I'm looking to parse something like:
|
|
| SomeValue
|
|
|
|
|
|
| into
|
| PropertyMetaData pmd = new PropertyMetaData();
|
| CollectionMetaData cmd = new CollectionMet
BTW, as there seems to be some confusion
I know I can modify the local properties to make it work with other databases,
however I would then need the database scripts to set up these other databases.
You provide only the MySQL script.
I at one time created a HSQL script that would do just
Is there a way in the MetadataDrivenObjectModelFactory to
reuse element bindings?
e.g. In dtd terms I have something like:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| etc.
|
But value and value-type are not real artificats in my javabean model
they represent the same property with the same semanti
volunteer? I already wrote you a HSQL script that you didn't include. Shall I
volunteer to write more code that will be discarded?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870455#3870455
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-27?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-27:
---
Summary: structured activities execution (was: structured blocks execution)
> structured activities execution
> ---
>
> Key: JBPM-27
>
Although, in this case it is not a true Enum (singleton instances)
so I could probably work around the problem by modifying the class
to have a setter?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870453#3870453
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/inde
I've switched over the kernel xml deployer to use the
MetadataDrivenObjectModelFactory,
but I don't see a replacement for the TypeBinding processing?
I use this previously to initialize an Enum from a String
|
|/**
| * A KernelControllerState converter
| */
|protect
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-80?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-80:
---
Description:
Environment:
Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 2
Fix Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 2
> Event Handling
> --
>
>
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-79?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-79:
---
Fix Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 2
> Compensation Handling
> -
>
> Key: JBPM-79
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBP
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-78?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-78:
---
Fix Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 2
> Fault and Termination Handling
> --
>
> Key: JBPM-78
> URL: http://jira.jboss.c
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-77?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-77:
---
Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
Fix Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
> Remove jbpm milestone
> -
>
> Key: JBPM-77
>
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-74?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-74:
---
Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
Fix Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
> transformation from bpel 1.1 to 2.0
> ---
>
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-65?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-65:
---
Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
Fix Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
> bpel configuration files parsing
>
>
>
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-63?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-63:
---
Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
Fix Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
> Refactor BpelActivity class hierarchy
>
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-62?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-62:
---
Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
Fix Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
> Implement link semantics with jbpm Milestones
>
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-28?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-28:
---
Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
Fix Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
> Link Semantics (12.5.1) and Death Path elimination (12.5.2)
> --
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-25?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-25:
---
Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
> bpel activities xml parsing
> ---
>
> Key: JBPM-25
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/br
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-27?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-27:
---
Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
Fix Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
> structured blocks execution
> ---
>
> Key:
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-26?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-26:
---
Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
Fix Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 1
> bpel archives parsing
> -
>
> Key: JBPM-26
>
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-9?page=comments#action_12316202 ]
Kabir Khan commented on EJBTHREE-9:
---
Added some more exceptions.
Still have no support for exceptions relating to detached/removed etc. See TODO
comments in org.jboss.ejb
Scope (13)
--
Key: JBPM-90
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-90
Project: JBoss jBPM
Type: Task
Components: BPEL
Versions: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 2
Reporter: Juan Cantu
Assigned to: Juan Cantu
Fix For: jBPM 3.0 BPEL exte
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-84?page=history ]
Kabir Khan closed EJBTHREE-84:
--
Resolution: Done
> EntityManager.find should throw EntityNotFoundException
> ---
>
> Key: EJBTHR
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-89?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-89:
---
Original Estimate: 288000 (was: 57600)
Remaining Estimate: 288000 (was: 57600)
> create initial persistence for bpel definition and instance classes
> --
Can't you just create your own cvs branch?
If some directories become redundant (and it is an issue for you)
you can ask the sourceforge staff to remove them.
If do want a prototype project, all you have to do is:
cvs import ...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=b
I posted the same topic in the JBoss Labs forum, but it seems it was the wrong
forum to post on.
Do we currently have the possibility to host an autonomous prototype project?
Use Case:
I am currently working on the JMS Facade, which is a pretty self contained (to
a point) part of the JBoss Mes
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050316160330Lbuild.884
BUILD COMPLETE - build.884Date of build: 03/16/2005 16:03:30Time to build: 19 minutes 21 secondsLast changed: 03/16/2005 15:49:29Last log entry: Java Types generated u
Updated Invocation marshalling to support standard payloads
---
Key: JBREM-83
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-83
Project: JBoss Remoting
Type: Task
Components: marshall
Versions: 1.0.1 final
There are a couple of issues here (I am actually working through a few of them
currently due to a bug submitted recently). As it is now a Connector can have
one and only one invoker, but can have multiple handlers.
The invoker has to have its marshaller/unmarshaller explicitly set for it
(ei
Hi,
I tried using the text editor in Portal to create a jsp file but it sees it as
a binary file and once I save I can no longer edit it. Is there any way to
manage jsp files with the ability to edit them?
Thanx
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p
I have modified the Entity Mailbox to hold a serialized copy of the mail body.
I think there is enough of the store in place now that the new mailbox
implementation could be integrated. Most of the changes outstanding for the
store will be behind the Store interfaces (e.g. configurable minimum
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20050316144152
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:66: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbos
create initial persistence for bpel definition and instance classes
---
Key: JBPM-89
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-89
Project: JBoss jBPM
Type: Task
Components: BPEL
Versions: jBPM
Help Curly Quotes are being chnged to ? marks when i import into html editor in
nukes
anonymous wrote : ? should be a curly quote please help
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870432#3870432
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?
Bad CRC checksum on files in downloaded archive
---
Key: JBAS-1593
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1593
Project: JBoss Application Server
Type: Bug
Versions: JBossAS-4.0.2RC1
Environment: WinZip
R
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-31?page=history ]
Alejandro GuÃzar resolved JBPM-31:
--
Resolution: Done
> bpel message properties and correlation
> ---
>
> Key: JBPM-31
> URL: http://jir
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-79?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-79:
---
Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 2
(was: jBPM 3.0 alpha 2)
> Compensation Handling
> -
>
> Key: JBPM-79
> URL:
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-78?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-78:
---
Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 2
(was: jBPM 3.0 alpha 1)
> Fault and Termination Handling
> --
>
> Key: JBPM-7
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-64?page=history ]
Juan Cantu updated JBPM-64:
---
Version: jBPM 3.0 BPEL extension alpha 2
(was: jBPM 3.0 alpha 1)
> Scope (13)
> --
>
> Key: JBPM-64
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/
Yes
A good place to start is EJB3. I am using the same stuff they're using. Just
create the simplest stateless session bean and track an invocation with a
debugger. That's pretty much it.
I am pushing really hard to put the protoype out, so we'll have a common ground
to base our discussions o
Okay, we cross-posted on the other thread. I'll be looking for it in the near
future. I'll probably look at the interceptors first.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870426#3870426
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix?log=log20050316133929Lbuild.78
BUILD COMPLETE - build.78Date of build: 03/16/2005 13:39:29Time to build: 39 minutes 49 secondsLast changed: 03/15/2005 18:12:58Last log entry: [JBAS-1589] -
Remoting is used behind the JMS API.
Use case:
Your client code looks up a ConnectionFactory in JNDI and it uses it to create
a Connection.
The ConectionFactory implementation (which delegates to a dynamic proxy) will
use Remoting to connect to a server pair, which will create a
ConnectionDel
Actually, above you say:
As for the communication between remote clients and server peers, I will use
Tom Elrod's Remoting.
So it seems that the Remoting is just for clients wanting to use Messaging
outside of the JMS API? Or will you create a JMS client as well?
View the original post :
htt
This thread continues at
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870417#3870417
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870418#3870418
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870418
--
Hey Steve,
This is a continuation of
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=61068
I actually already have a full JMS Facade prototype that makes obvious how I
want to use Remoting and the AOP API for interceptors.
It's still in my private CVS and the reason I didn't put it
Hello Ovidiu.
I've looked over the remoting stuff. Which Handler(s) do you expect to have,
and how many?
Will you expose the JMS facade directly over the remoting API (i.e. use a
Remoting Client to use JMS) or are the remote handlers just for JMS<->JMS
communication? As in, between servers tha
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-36?page=comments#action_12316195 ]
Ricardo Arguello commented on JBMAIL-36:
Shouldn't a hash function (ie SHA-1) be more appropiate for this task?
> Support (optional) CRC or long hashkey generation f
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20050316123446Lbuild.109
BUILD COMPLETE - build.109Date of build: 03/16/2005 12:34:46Time to build: 54 minutes 34 secondsLast changed: 03/15/2005 23:48:20Last log entry: Add the 4.0.
Have anyone done the porting of ATG Cache LockManager to JBossCache? If so,
please share with us how to come about doing it. We have so many problems with
using the ATG Cache LockManager (deadlock, single Point of Failure etc..) and
we are planning to find a solution that we allow help us resol
Noticed that not only my own code works fine with no "datatype=invocation"
parameter in the socket connector MBean, but EJB testcases work too. To me
this was surprising, as those testcases perform EJB calls through the unified
invoker. (Maybe EJB calls work with no "datatype=invocation" becaus
It was updated in the beta docs and the wiki:
http://docs.jboss.com/jbportal/v2.0beta1/user-guide/html/installation.html#d0e245
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870408#3870408
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=p
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-112?page=history ]
Bela Ban resolved JBCACHE-112:
--
Resolution: Done
> Added putFailFast(Fqn, ...)
> ---
>
> Key: JBCACHE-112
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/
Added putFailFast(Fqn, ...)
---
Key: JBCACHE-112
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-112
Project: JBoss Cache
Type: Feature Request
Versions: 1.2.1
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assigned to: Bela Ban
Fix For: 1.2.2
--
T
what version are you using ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870398#3870398
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870398
---
SF email is spon
JaccAuthorizationRealm always returns false on subsequent requests
--
Key: JBAS-1592
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1592
Project: JBoss Application Server
Type: Bug
Components: Security, D
When i run the build file I get this error message.
BUILD FAILED
| D:\workspace\jbossportal\tools\etc\buildfragments\tools.ent:140: taskdef A
class needed by
| class org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.CactusTask cannot be found:
junit/framework/Test
I know that this is probably something ve
The code:
struts-config.xml:
|
|
|
|
|
main.ftl
| <#assign html=JspTaglibs["/WEB-INF/struts-html.tld"]>
| <#assign bean=JspTaglibs["/WEB-INF/struts-bean.tld"]>
| This is main.ftl in stack2.war.
| If you see this, it means basic Struts action-mapping
Has anyone transferred their Struts application to run as a JSR168 portet in
jBoss Portal??
I am using jBossAS 4.0.1sp1 and jBoss Portal v2.0.
Whats confusing me is this: In struts, every action defines the
html/jsp/freemarker etc page that should be displayed. on the user's screen.
However, to
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-testsuite?log=log20050316113715
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:66: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbo
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote :
| I have checked in the code under
jboss-head/testsuite/src/main/test/cache/test/standAloneAop/CollectionProxyAopTest.
Check it out.
| -Ben
When I browse the CVS repository here
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/ I don't see the file, in fact I
don't
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo