>>>
> >>>I've seen the same thing with mySQL today (it did work with the CVS
> >>>sources
> >>>from about 3 weeks ago).
> >>>
> >>>After having a closer look at the list of registered MBeans
> >>>(localhost:8082)
> Uncle. It seems that JBOSS is designed assuming that it has
> full control of creating tables.
This isn't really true. JBossCMP makes the assumption that if the table
structure is not specified the Application Deployer does not care what the
structure is, as long as it runs.
I strongly reco
ay to integrate this into the build process. This is why I waited so long
to add my tests.
-dain
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:04 AM
> To: David Jencks
> Cc: Dain Sundstrom; jboss-dev
> Subject: R
> >>
> >>If I use the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file I can get it to work.
> >>
> >
> > Do you have to use the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file? If you
> don't, what happens?
> > Does the system generate two columns with the same name?
> >
>
> The database table already exsists. Basically I have to use
> for
sure with 2.0 but check jaws.xml file therefore
> > you should have the datasource specified.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Hunter Hillegas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROT
> > The other issue I have is my tests use a, yet to be
> completed, extension
> > to
> > JUnit which runs the tests on the serverside (I wrote
> this). This is
> > required for testing local interfaces which by definition are not
> > accessible
> > remotely. Anyway, how do I go about adding t
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 3:50 PM
> To: Dain Sundstrom; JBoss Dev
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?
>
>
> I haven't dug around in the source yet. If you can give me a
> pointer where
> to look, I'll check it out..
Looks right to me. Did you try tracking this down in the source? I'll look
at it later but I'm a little busy right now.
-dain
> -Original Message-
> From: Hunter Hillegas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:48 PM
> To: JBoss Dev
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar
Comments below (changed subject to reflect new discussion thread)
> Lets say you put it in .../test/cmp2/.
>
> Test cases go in .../test/cmp2/test. They should be named
> *UnitTestCase.java or *StressTestCase.java. They should descend from
> JBossTestCase.
>
> Typically you will have an applica
>
> On 2001.11.19 12:28:58 -0500 Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> > >
> > > As if your life isn't hard enough...;-)
> >
> > :)
> >
> > > I'm going to start looking at extending the CMP 2 code to
> > > work with CCI
> > >
Funny, that is on the todo list also. I have a fairly complete xml. Can we
reverse generate a DTD?
-dain
> -Original Message-
> From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:05 AM
> To: Dain Sundstrom; jboss-dev
> Subject: Is
>
> As if your life isn't hard enough...;-)
:)
> I'm going to start looking at extending the CMP 2 code to
> work with CCI
> resource adapters as well as jca-jdbc drivers. (the aim is to
> use EJB 2
> with an object database, for which there is a CCI connector.)
I have been thinking about a
> > Ok, you are not getting it.
> >
>
> I am it's just that the moon is gone ;)
>
>
> > Although JBossCMP does not generate the column names you
> would like, the
> > system still runs. Is that correct? (i.e., this is still
> a suggestion)
> >
>
> If I use the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file I ca
Comments inline ..
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
> >>Finally, we are on the same page ..not even a blue moon ...
> >>
> >
> > About time :)
> >
> >
> >>Yup this is a suggestion. I agree 100% we need to avoid using
> >>jboss
>
> Finally, we are on the same page ..not even a blue moon ...
About time :)
> Yup this is a suggestion. I agree 100% we need to avoid using
> jbosscmp-jdbc.xml.
>
>
> Ultimately at the database level for each table there has to
> be a unique
> column name(s) that acts as a foreign key
12:22 PM
> To: Dain Sundstrom
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] 1 to Many Relations
>
>
> When it tries to load the CDTrack relation it generates the following
> sql statement ..
>
> select uuid from CDTrack where composer_composed_songs=?
>
>
> I'm using xdoclet to generate the ejb-jar.xml file. When you are
> generating the accessor methods it automaticly assumes that
> the accessor
> name matches the database column name. So in your example by
> default it
> is looking for a database columns named composer and performer.
>
> Th
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
> >>OK i'm playing with the latest RH CVS and testing out 1 to many
> >>relations (bi directional). So ..
> >>
> >>Table1 {
> >> primary_key int,
> >>}
> >>
> >>TableMany {
>
> this seems like a weird solution to me and sound to me like you are
> trying to ignore these serious licensing issues.
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
> >No wonder people bitch about Debian.
> >
> >I vote we forget the DEB and just build an RMP, which Debian
> ca
.
*
+ * @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Rickard Öberg
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Justin Forder
- * @version $Revision: 1.2 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.3 $
*/
-public class JDBCStopComman
No wonder people bitch about Debian.
I vote we forget the DEB and just build an RMP, which Debian can install.
-dain
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:20 PM
> To: Jason Dillon
> Cc: David Maplesden; JBoss Development
Destroy is not called on my persistence store anymore. Is destroy no longer
supported? I don't use stop so I could move my code back into stop, but I
can't speak for any other code.
-dain
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lis
Can you supply the quick 5 line example on properly creating loggers and
logging a message. I have been having trouble changing the log levels for
cmp. I tried and failed to turn only the CMP channel up to DEFAULT for the
console appender for my testing, so I end up turning up the entire console
>
> OK i'm playing with the latest RH CVS and testing out 1 to many
> relations (bi directional). So ..
>
> Table1 {
> primary_key int,
> }
>
> TableMany {
> primary_key int,
> table1_key int,
> }
>
> class Table1 {
>int getPrimary_key()
>Collection getTableMany();
> }
>
> cla
(enum.hasNext())
{
Container con = (Container)enum.next();
con.start();
}
}
This change would assume that you don't care if Conatiner has an init
method.
-dain
> -Original Message-
> From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5
> -Original Message-
> From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:58 PM
> To: Dain Sundstrom
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean init/start change broke CMR
>
>
> On 2001.11.14 17:11:52 -0500 D
t we can't use a declared
dependancy system, because the entity dependance information is in the
ejb-jar.xml file.
I could be easly wrong.
-dain
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:56 PM
> To: Dain
ejb2.init();
ejb2.start();
ejb3.init();
ejb3.start();
ejb4.init();
ejb4.start();
-dain
> -Original Message-
> From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] MBean init/start change
Hi all,
I think that the merging of init and start has broken the CMR code. The CMR
code depends on having a complete two-phase startup. In the phase 1 (init)
all of the relation ships are connected, and in phase 2 (start) these
relationships are used to create the entity tables with fks, relat
This is great.
This is what I wanted to do when I wrote my "message" passing hack. I think
one problem is the current interceptors will be expecting a Method object,
so when they are changed to handle an Invocation with out a Method object, I
will definitely switch over.
-dain
> -Original
I couldn't agree more.
When I first started reading the code, It was hard to sperate the EJB
sepecific stuff from the rest. I think this will help up out alot.
-dain
> -Original Message-
> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:21 AM
> To: J
One thing I have noticed it that the newbie programmers that are most likely
to not implement equals and hashCode correctly, don't use a custom primary
key. Instead they use an Integer, Long, or String.
-dain
> -Original Message-
> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tu
>
> Dain,
>
> I am reading your stuff and I see that you use the invocation
> chain to do
> "ADD_RELATION" on the bean you are working with. Is this
> what you were
> talking about the other day?
Yep.
> My question is do you really need to go through the container
> chain, since
> it goes
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/13 14:26:25
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/ejbql
EJBQLParser.java SQLTarget.java
Log:
Remove typo that caused the literal "WHERE" to be case sensitive.
Made idenfification variables case insensitive as required
]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.6 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.7 $
*/
public class JDBCTypeFactory {
// the type mapping to use with the specified database
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@
ArrayList properties = new ArrayList();
Class
1.7
+++ JDBCRelationshipRoleMetaData.java 2001/11/13 20:19:07 1.8
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
* ejb-jar.xml file's ejb-relation elements.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.7 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.8 $
*/
publi
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/13 12:15:24
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCRemoveEntityCommand.java
Log:
Fixed a bug where if a related entity was related two ways with cascade
delete, the command would attempt to remove the entity twice.
2001 10:27 AM
> To: Dain Sundstrom; 'Peter Levart';
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] loading 10 EBs takes 5s 1st time called
>
>
> Have you thought of profiling the code to determine what's
> taking so long?
>
> > -Original Message--
> Hello!
>
> I just wanted to know if somebody has a straight answer. I'm
> using JBoss 3.0
> alpha with CMP 2.0.
>
> The first time I reference let's say 10 Entity Beans after a
> JBoss restart it
> takes approx. 5 seconds to retrieve data from them. The
> second and subsequent
> requests
I didn't think this mesage was correct, so I took a look at the remove code.
The cmr fields were broken.
A literal reading of the spec has the following delete order:
1. Remove entity from all relationships
2. Remove entity
3. Cascade the delete to all cascade-delete relationships
So this leads
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/10 14:50:25
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCRemoveEntityCommand.java
Log:
Synchronize entities in tx befor remove, is entity had CMR fields.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +6 -1
jboss/src/mai
>
> |I'm not working this. Feel free to take a shot at it. I
> apologies in
> |advance for the code not being documented well. The cmr code is
> |not easy to
> |understand because entities can not talk directly to each
> other, but must
> |use the invoker chain.
>
> what do you need to make
was opened at 2001-11-06 09:35
> > You can respond by visiting:
> >
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=47
> 8783&group_id
> >=22866
> >
> > Category: JBossCMP
> > Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable)
> > Status: Open
The
problem has to do with the EJB spec. The spec says that the pk must be set
in the ejbCreate method and then can't be changed. The spec also says that
cmr fields can not be set until ejbPostCreate. Furthermore the spec only
allows cmp-fields in compound pks. I haven't thought of a way
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- JDBCUtil.java 2001/09/11 18:35:00 1.6
+++ JDBCUtil.java 2001/11/03 23:09:23 1.7
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
* parameters and loading query results.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.6 $
+ *
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/03 14:52:42
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCFindEntitiesCommand.java
Log:
Applied path 452047, which changes cutom finders to be keyed based on
interface method instead of implementation method. Custom find
I remember seeing some posts about JVM crashes on linux, but don't remember
if it was ever resolved. I am fairly regularly getting a crash with the RH
server. I just restart the server, and the test run fine.
I get a bunch or internal info then.
#
# HotSpot Virtual Machine Error : 11
# Error I
@@
import org.w3c.dom.Element;
/**
- * This immutable class contains information about the application
+ * This immutable class contains information about the application
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
* @author Sebastien Alborini
- * @version $
01/11/03 19:51:17 1.4
@@ -17,91 +17,111 @@
* file's relationships elements.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.3 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.4 $
*/
public class RelationMetaData extends MetaData {
-
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/02 13:20:29
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/ejbql
EJBQLParser.java
Log:
Added support for input parameters in collection_member_expression as is
required in the EJB 2.0 Final Draft.
Revision ChangesPat
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/02 13:19:12
Modified:src/etc/conf/default standardjboss.xml
Log:
Changed CMP 2.0 Entities back to use
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.lock.QueuedPessimisticEJBLock.
Revision ChangesPath
1.24 +2 -3 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/standardjboss.xm
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.lock.NonentrantMessage;
import org.jboss.ejb.EntityEnterpriseContext;
/**
@@ -15,7 +16,7 @@
* JDBCRelationInterceptor.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.4 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.5 $
*/
public interface CM
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/02 13:14:42
Removed: src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/bridge
NewQueuedPessimisticEJBLock.java
Log:
Code integrated into org.jboss.ejb.plugins.lock.BeanLockSupport
___
Jboss-devel
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/02 13:14:01
Removed: src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/bridge
NonentrantMessage.java
Log:
Moved to org.jboss.ejb.plugins.lock
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/02 13:12:10
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/lock BeanLockSupport.java
Log:
Added support for non-entrant messages to be passed through invocation
chain. A method invocation is non-entrant if it is on a reentrant bean,
a known non-entrant met
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
* @version $$
*/
public interface NonentrantMessage {
}
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11
--- JDBCCMRFieldBridge.java 2001/11/02 18:29:32 1.10
+++ JDBCCMRFieldBridge.java 2001/11/02 19:05:49 1.11
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
* One for each role that entity has.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
* One per cmp entity bean type.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.10 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.11 $
*/
public class JDBCEntityBridge implements EntityBridge {
p
--- CMPFieldBridge.java 2001/09/01 22:03:14 1.4
+++ CMPFieldBridge.java 2001/11/02 18:19:22 1.5
@@ -19,32 +19,80 @@
* One for each entity bean cmp field.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revis
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
* One for each role that entity has.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.9 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.10 $
*/
public class JDBCCMRFieldBridge implements CMRFie
21:28:22 1.6
+++ EntityBridgeInvocationHandler.java2001/11/02 18:23:13 1.7
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
* One per cmp entity bean instance, including beans in pool.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.6 $
+ *
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/02 10:24:25
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCCreateEntityCommand.java
JDBCLoadEntityCommand.java
Log:
Now marks the bean as created after successful execution.
Revision Changes
revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- EntityBridge.java 2001/09/01 22:03:14 1.3
+++ EntityBridge.java 2001/11/02 18:21:22 1.4
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
* One per cmp entity bean type.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revis
query specifiection type.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.6 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.7 $
*/
public class JDBCQueryMetaDataFactory {
private JDBCEntityMetaData entity;
@@ -86,16 +86,6 @@
String me
--- QueryMetaData.java2001/08/03 17:15:54 1.3
+++ QueryMetaData.java2001/11/02 00:51:56 1.4
@@ -17,94 +17,99 @@
* Contains information about ejb-ql queries.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.3 $
+ *
I got all my new code in and everything builds again.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss build failed
>
>
> Sorry, this
revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- JDBCCommandFactory.java 2001/10/09 00:29:43 1.7
+++ JDBCCommandFactory.java 2001/11/01 23:17:05 1.8
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
* @author mailto:[EMAIL P
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/11/01 15:16:33
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCDefinedFinderCommand.java
Log:
Added support for ejbSelect queries.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +144 -42
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/j
.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.5 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.6 $
*/
public class JDBCTypeFactory {
// the type mapping to use with the specified database
private JDBCTypeMappingMetaData typeMapping;
- // all the a
is mapped to a column
@@ -21,66 +21,71 @@
* the Java Bean.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.4 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.5 $
*/
public class JDBCTypeComplexProperty {
- private String propertyName;
- privat
.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.4 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.5 $
*/
public class JDBCTypeComplex implements JDBCType {
private JDBCTypeComplexProperty[] properties;
@@ -32,8 +33,12 @@
private int[] jdbcTypes;
Sorry, this is from me. I am still checking in all my changes.
-dain
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] jboss build failed
>
>
>
>
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
* One for each entity bean cmp field.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.6 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.7 $
*/
public abstract class JDBCAbstractCMPFieldBridge im
.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.4 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.5 $
*/
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.rmi.RemoteException;
@@ -32,13 +32,16 @@
import org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.bridge.Select
contains information about an entity
+ * This immutable class contains information about an entity
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @author Sebastien Alborini
+ * @author Sebastien Alborini
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dirk Zimmermann
org.jboss.metadata.QueryMetaData;
import org.w3c.dom.Element;
@@ -17,28 +24,73 @@
* Imutable class contains information about a declated query.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.5 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.6 $
*/
public fin
.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.5 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.6 $
*/
public class EntityBridgeInvocationHandler implements InvocationHandler {
protected EntityContainer container;
@@ -44,10 +44,23 @@
p
This is a bad idea. You are effectively creating two caches of the same
data, but there is no code to keep them in sync. Although this may work
today, you could get weird non-reproducible errors down the road.
Dan pointed out that engine can delay insert until after postCreate or until
the end of
Has anyone notice that the docs on JBoss.org are missing. When you click on
the "Manual - online HTML version" I get the following.
HTTP ERROR: 404 Not Found
Could not find resource for /documentation/HTML/index.html
RequestURI=/documentation/HTML/index.html
Someone should at least put up a pag
See ejb 2.0 final draft section 10.3.4.2: Cascade-delete.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] CMP 2.0 One-to-One Referential Integrity on
> remove()
>
>
> I cr
> > > The following issues apply to foreign-key-mapping ..
> > >
> > >
> > > 1) problems with unidirectional relations:
> > >
> > > deployment does not work, because the
> > > JDBCCMRFieldBridge.initRelatedData
> > > does not find the related cmrField -> throws DeploymentException
> >
> > I
> The following issues apply to foreign-key-mapping ..
>
>
> 1) problems with unidirectional relations:
>
> deployment does not work, because the
> JDBCCMRFieldBridge.initRelatedData
> does not find the related cmrField -> throws DeploymentException
I just fixed a bug in this code last night
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/10/20 20:21:03
Modified:src/etc/conf/default standardjboss.xml
Log:
Changed cmp 2.0 beans to use the modified queued pessimistic lock, which
handles non-entrant method invocations.
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +3 -2 jboss/src/etc/conf/d
--- CMRMessage.java 2001/09/01 22:03:16 1.3
+++ CMRMessage.java 2001/10/21 03:17:10 1.4
@@ -15,9 +15,9 @@
* JDBCRelationInterceptor.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.3 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.4 $
*/
* this interface.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
* @version $Revision: 1.1 $
*/
public interface NonentrantMessage {
}
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.n
Maybe I am a complete idiot, but what should I see if the test is
successful?
As a policy, should some one only check-in if the change does not increase
the number of failures / errors?
Dain
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, October
Do we have a FAQ? If not, I think we should start one.
About every third day I get a message asking me what version of JBoss
supports CMP 2.0, or I get a message asking where 3.0 is.
I know this info is in the message archives, but I think it would be a good
thing to have a central place for a p
revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
--- JDBCCMRFieldBridge.java 2001/09/11 18:35:00 1.7
+++ JDBCCMRFieldBridge.java 2001/10/20 16:14:57 1.8
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
* One for each role that entity has.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
There are to things that are hard. T
he first is mapping the output columns to the result object. This is
complicated by the fact that a cmp field can map to more then one column.
You will have to add error handling to assure that all of the properties of
a field are loaded. I don't think my h
> Thanks, I realize it has always been like this... glad to see
> it is the
> default in ejb2.0
Actually you can't turn it off. This is a side affect of the eager/lazy
loading feature where we may not have all the data to do a complete update.
-dain
___
comments below...
> >>>4. database functions
> >>>If I am doing a query on a datestamp type field but I only
> >>>
> >>care about
> >>
> >>>the date part, in postgresql I need to use a postgresql
> >>>
> >>function that
> >>
> >>>only returns the date.
> >>>
> >
> > Date handling is EJB-QL sucks.
> > The blueprint
> >
(http://java.sun.com/j2ee/blueprints/design_patterns/page_by_page_iterator/i
> > ndex.html) applies to client access of the result set. The problem is
the
> > blueprint assumes that then entire result set of the query can fit into
> > server memory.
>
> The implementation do
> >>> 2. No limit/offset or cursors.
> >>> In a word searches. If you are tring to search for
> >> something you display
> >>> a list of current values based on a selection criteria.
> What happens
> >>> when the list is 100,000 records. With current DB code you
> >> would declare
> >>> a cursor
Hi,
I agree that requested features are necessary, although I don't necessarily
agree with the suggested implementation. Currently, I am focusing on spec
compliance, and I need to update the code to the final spec. As Marc
suggested, if you want to see these features soon, submit a patch,
otherwi
===
CMP 2.0 [JBoss 3.0]
Author:
Dain
Sundstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Activate CMP 2.0
Change ejb-jar.xml doctype
CMP 2.0 is only available to Entity Beans in an EJB 2.0 jar files. An EJB 2.0
jar is identified by the doctype of the
User: dsundstrom
Date: 01/09/18 11:14:06
Modified:src/xdocs jbossdocs.xml
Log:
Added CMP 2.x documentation.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +5 -3 manual/src/xdocs/jbossdocs.xml
Index: jbossdocs.xml
==
Bill,
When you get to coding this, send me an email. I already have an attribute
in the cmp config file for this. I think there should be one place to mark
the entire entity as read-only. I haven't been following this discussion,
but I think I understand why we need to move the declaration up to
Comments below...
> Got it now ... but it is still not seeing eye to eye ... comments below ..
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
> > Dave,
> >
> > We still don't see eye-to-eye, and I think I made the problem worse with
my
> > example.
> >
> >
$ cvs co jboss-most
cvs server: cannot find module `_jboss_support' - ignored
cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules
jboss-all works fine, so whats the deal with jboss-most?
-dain
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://
aions.
Is there an interface for HttpSession persistence in the web container
layer?
-dain
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 2:50 PM
> To: Dain Sundstrom
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: Persistant Http
801 - 900 of 1053 matches
Mail list logo
