the same SS
when it comes back up ... maybe even with que'ed requests ...
/peter_f
> --jason
>
>
> Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>
>> Maybe a central listener factory could hand out listerner objects to
>> services and from there also manage multiple instance dete
he maintenece... which I would like to have fixed.
You can get it from the sf.net/hsqldb patch area ...
/peter_f
> --jason
>
>
> Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>
>> on 04-04-2 03.13, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Where are the patched sources for t
Maybe a central listener factory could hand out listerner objects to
services and from there also manage multiple instance detection plus
migration of services depending on A-VM going down while B-VM are using for
example A-VM's JNP.
/peter_f
___
Jbo
on 04-04-2 03.13, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Where are the patched sources for the JBoss HSQLDB? Does anyone know if
> the 1.7.x version is flexible enough to use it out of the box? If not,
> could whoever patched it in the first place try to get those changes
> commited... assu
on 28-03-2 11.42, Chandan S Pansare at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is real urgent.
try :
http://www.hp.com/products1/unix/java/java2/sdkrte1_3/index.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/li
on 28-03-2 00.25, Yannick Menager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> keep the flame throwers away :)
Listen - .
..
..
Once
-I was young
- a long time ago
- true
- when co
on 27-03-2 15.15, Ken Sipe at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't know the level of JSR 77 support at this time in JBoss and hadn't
> thought about it.
look in test.managment.test
a servlet talking to the MEJB might be a good start ? i thought there was
one allready ?
/peter_f
___
on 27-03-2 16.18, Vesco Claudio at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> modify passord in Default Db
have You tried " " instead of "" ?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
on 27-03-2 15.33, Vesco Claudio at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> + db/hypersonic/default.script as martin has written.
whats that ? where ?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-developme
on 25-03-2 23.58, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What about CVS do you want integrated?
dont know just freeflowing
- maybe a do a checkout and build - test cycle - ftp report to IP(lubega).
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROT
on 25-03-2 23.42, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1) Provides pseudo-late-binding for properties.
> 2) Provides helper tasks to set system properties, plus a few other
> utilities .
> 3) Provides a mechanism to hook up multipule sub-projects based on
> property configuration.
>
> Perh
on 25-03-2 21.38, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> While on topic of BM can U please explain what it does that ant task's can
>> not do ? and WHY do We have a top level BlackBox instead of a 'standard' way
>> to extend and build with ant ! ... ? ...
> If you can make Ant do what the c
on 25-03-2 01.07, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> y35 j00 D1d. =P
thats pearl ?;) or BuildMagic lingo ?
While on topic of BM can U please explain what it does that ant task's can
not do ? and WHY do We have a top level BlackBox instead of a 'standard' way
to extend and build with an
on 25-03-2 00.25, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I should be more specific, if there is a lock which persists for an
> extended period of time let us know...
We did - di We not ?
Should We have to do that ?
___
Jboss-development mailing
on 23-03-2 03.23, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was just looking through this, answered a couple, but damn this is a
> mess... not really what I expected to find under a FAQ listing... its
> half FAQ-like entries and then half lame user questions...
I deployed a big fat war called
on 17-03-2 21.21, Marius Kotsbak at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I get this stacktrace when the bean with container managed JMS is
> passivated:
Yes - Protocol - is protocol :
Whatever mind U HAVE over there is welcome !
/p
>
> INFO [STDOUT] AbstraktSender.ejbPassivate
> 21:13:03,098 ERROR
on 15-03-2 22.05, David Jencks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My opinion still is that handling this automatically is the best solution,
> by converting every kind of dependency into an mbean dependency. If we get
> people used to numbering their files, then they will have a delightful
> opportun
on 13-03-2 14.42, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> rc1-rc6 has been in Unix for 20 years, so let's stop fucking around
A understandeble order there ... mmm - I can not help thinking of a observer
pattern design for the dependency and deploy order. Together with a
interface registry laye
on 24-02-2 06.13, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Any thoughts about adding a new priority/level for logging stats and
> metrics?
on 24-02-2 06.45, David Jencks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd say no, this should be done through jmx not logging.
I envision a new Statistics - Appen
Suggetions for leaflet tagging the skirt !
-- ( translation from Oleg´s sourze ... )
The bloom of the furture holds freedom,
SUNRISE nurture the influx of our taste,
Hey, president follow the vangard,
Autonomous BEA ...
--
+ the runner up´s ++
Humor is expelled !.
The Source is you.
LUDICROU
on 08-02-2 00.46, Adam Heath at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>
>> When it comes to suggestions here --- hotmail and debian accounts will not
>> qualify ...
>
> What do you mean by the above comment?
>
> I sent my mail with
I will second the switch ...
on 08-02-2 00.15, James Ward at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Simply Irresistible
>
> YOUR APP SERVER SUCKS!
>
> First they ignore us...
> Second they laugh at us...
> Then they fight us..
> And then we win!
>
> We're the shit!
>
> For a good time type www.jboss
When it comes to suggestions here --- hotmail and debian accounts will not
qualify ...
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
on 07-02-2 23.36, Colin Daly at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> in the immortal words of Ali
>
> JBoss:
> we're young
> we're fast
> we're handsome and
> we can't possibly be beaten.
We would collect excessive belly lint .. though ...
___
Jboss-developme
JBoss Embedded
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
JBoss One for All
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
JBoss Serve´s All
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
You are marc´ed ! ...
on 26-01-2 01.54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> who's marc ?
>
> ___
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
_
YEA - thats easy !!! ...
read the FAQ & RTMF and then ask over at user@list (really displaced
sematiccts here !) and heepp your on ...
/p
on 19-01-2 02.11, Darryl Thompson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hell,
>
> I am new to Jboss and trasitioning from Weblogic
> server 6.1. I need to
Yes - a wallet componenet followed with a RT CC Processor Servive ...
Is something others can match ...
Wallet would be a persistent store called with wallet.add(002$) call --from
whatever service --- in a jboss container ...
/peter_f
RT = Real Time == danger === oki - "so `CRT´ \""close to re
>Yah that's it...
I love the way ... U ... come back .. on nothingness´s
/p
"The
language we use
influences the thoughts we
think much more than the thoughts
we think influence
the language we
use."
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PRO
on 04-01-2 23.28, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would not expect users to have to or want to change those.
I think this defines well the semantic func going on ...
I am a user ( proud user, that is ( ... ) ( so are U ( ...( proud that is )
) ) ... ) ... I am a dev ... I am I ...
on 02-01-2 10.06, Eric Chow at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "access control"
Try the Installation & Configuration forum
http://jboss.org/forums/forum.jsp?forum=61
for a OS specific solution ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
on 1-12-29 03.08, Adrian Brock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Correction.
>
> I've now seen the problem on Windows JDK1.3.1_02 :-(
>
> Regards,
> Adrian
Makes me wonder - thanks I like wonder ...
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL P
on 1-12-29 02.26, John Woo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It is a bunch of
> frustrated user speaking to an empty room while a
> bunch of academic are off playing with Java.
yes ... perchanche ... so what are U doing here ? ...
heh
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called
on 1-12-29 02.21, John Woo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> but you forum software down now.
hehe
Will analyse !
this is fun ... fbi/co and stuff ... man that sp (south pacific) training is
realise ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing li
U are exercising a Debian distro *view* ? ...
heheheheheheh
And have what ??? ...
problem / solution domain ...
are U referring to here ??? ...
I think and will stake my being **on**, that WE can ***help*** ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development m
on 1-12-28 23.30, John Woo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I read the description on your web site, and get very
> excited about the product.
MetavValue ! ...
> But when I try and use the
> JBoss 3.0 alpha, I am wondering why you not spend any
> time on the web container? J2EE container without a
I do not understand this fully yet - but the cl separation - gives
unprecedented integrity ! ... ? ...
/peter_f
on 1-12-21 08.32, Scott M Stark at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Its just the default distribution that results from running build.sh
> with the addition of the idgen.jar to the lib/dep
on 1-12-22 16.51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please could we get this fixed...
It is just the snobosish code genius that hinders this ! ... hehe ...
haha hohoho ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go back - -- WayBack ... there is truth ... ( or how U prefere to
spee () ... meaning ... "understanding the same" !) ... tho ...
on 1-12-22 19.29, Adrian Brock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yep,
>
> Thats the problem. I'm not sure how to fix this?
>
> First I made it always read the
on 1-12-20 05.37, David Budworth at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Am I just missing something here?
do not think so - I hear You clear ...
but meanwhile and before ev. change -just order Your MBeans ordered ? ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing
on 1-12-20 03.53, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> deploy xml´s in deploy / conf / sub / sub / duplica*y*e / sub duplicate
> folders ? ... do U have ? ...
It will get deployed as many times as You ask it to deploy *** ((port) & (
invocation style))) ... HSQLDB... is
on 1-12-20 03.19, Scott M Stark at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hese are the hsqldb.jars in the dist I am currently running:
mmm ...
how many deploy xml´s in deploy / conf / sub / sub / duplica*y*e / sub
duplicate folders ? ... do U have ? ...
I know stupid question - just making conversation re
on 1-12-17 05.40, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> -203 --You are referring to ---green threads !!! ...
>
> What? Honestly, do you feel that all of these hypens really need to be
> here? I think you have some weird punctuation obsession, if you don't type
> at least one pucnctuation
on 1-12-16 22.57, David Maplesden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> but we don't seem to get one after the 203.
-203 --You are referring to ---green threads !!! ...
Just $recently$ the *2* BlackdownVM's got clear shutdowns ! ... but
(but they never wrote out log in full ! ... this resembeling the o
on 1-12-12 08.43, Ara at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey I'm using WebSphere myself :-)
> But I think I should look at jboss more seriously ;-)
It look's like it is going to be *redefining-the-industry* easy to develop
and deploy on ... it will save You vast amounts of time ... simply one will
ge
I recall back when i was looking at the undependencys that :
-the "callchain" used by jboss_redhat_init.sh stop is using these MBeans
"JMX:name=Connector,type=RMI"
"Adaptor:name=html"
"JBOSS-SYSTEM:service=Naming"
and when they go out of scope (naming) ... no more is logged ? ...
--so those MB
on 1-12-11 03.35, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, one more time...
>
> Huh?
Two times -heh
***
We need a state -spine thing : --to deploy on ---then
Auto/level/grade/scope/... deloyer() has a state ...
/peter_f
> --jason
>
>
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2001,
Is it me or U that have the -clockoff ? ...
/peter_f
on 1-12-11 03.28, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Huh?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>
>> Starting
>> Suspended
>> Stopping
>&
Starting
Suspended
Stopping
returning anything else means running ? ...
;-)
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
I am impressed by the fact that green threeds now runs all tests and the
others run 36 lesser tests - it used to be the other way around not to long
ago ? ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/
on 1-12-09 11.06, Chris Kimpton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The message "The database is closed as Embbeded"
HSQLDB is writing out this message for every "channel" connection it has ...
when the JVM decides to GC ... I will update HypersonicDatabase so it
identifyes itself throught its own log
on 1-12-08 18.04, Allen Fogleson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> in my build script i changed
> /jboss-all/server/src/etc/conf/default/jboss-service.xml by adding
> tools.jar to the classpath element. then in my build script in the
> _module-j2ee-most I added the following:
>
>
> tofile="${insta
on 1-12-08 11.29, Chris Kimpton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "javac is in the classpath" - is there something I can change in my
> config to correct this? I believe I have an empty CLASSPATH when
> starting the jboss tests - so it should just be what jboss/ant
> adds...
I think Julian is looki
>> JBoss daily test results
>>
>> SUMMARY
>>
>> Number of tests run: 162
>>
>>
>>
>> Successful tests: 159
>>
>> Errors:1
>>
>> Failures: 2
>
> we are almost there it seems
Yes - out of 162 We have a 100% suc
on 1-12-08 02.41, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> me error on build ... let Me guess
Building beautiful now ... seems one has to flush hard when on unix ...maybe
on AS/400 as well? ... all i did was reopen shell ... (cache sucks) !? ...
anyway...
Avanti
/pete
Timestamp by above gives me error on build ... let Me guess nobody
elsehasthe BALLS to to say so - hehehehehehe
/Uknowwho
on 1-12-08 00.30, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> clean co works for you? doing better? let us know if it is still broken, last
> I saw it was ok,
>
> marcf
>
>
on 1-12-07 19.01, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> good for you but this should be the last of these messages,
I did a clean co and halts at MBeanProxy:112 ...
On a related topic...
What happend with the decentrialised build/run-testsuite/uppload results to
lubega from different OS's
on 1-12-06 15.56, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please move the demo-app discussion on the online forum,
Yes very good - We still need to find a structur -here now :
Scenario :
I dload JBoss3.0 binary
- it comes with a demo folder of deployable examples
In dload JBoss3.0 src i
on 1-12-06 16.22, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 2. Many people will be running JBoss on a JRE not a
>> JDK, and precompiling their JSPs during development.
Could We not just say clearly :
SDK required - else If running under JRE please copy tools.jar here .
on 1-12-06 15.44, Julian Gosnell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1. some architectures (One of my first beta testers is
> on MacOS X) do not seem to have the jar at all - it
> seems to have been collapsed into the rest of the
> runtime.
ahhh . a special for OSX ... hmmm .
> 2. Many people will be
on 1-12-06 13.12, Chris Kimpton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does this mean that the tests will fail until then - or is there
> another problem on my Testsuite run?
No i do not think so ... that behaivior has been there some time ... but the
new log4j.RollingFileAppender might need a bigger num
> I tried touching hsqldb-default-service.xml, and got
> a very unhelpful log message:
> 21:40:35,854 INFO [AutoDeployer] Auto deploy of
> file:/nfs/home/jason/ws/jboss/jboss-all/build/output/j
> oss-3.0.0alpha/deploy/hsqldb-default-service.xml
> 21:40:35,855 INFO [ServiceDeployer] not deploying
on 1-12-06 07.01, Allen Fogleson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> has anyone started working on dukes bank on Jboss 3?
U mean the BanUnitTest ? ... It usually works just fine ... so how would We
double some of the tests as demos ? or just use the Tests as the demos ? ...
how can we combine ? that i
on 1-12-06 07.01, Allen Fogleson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> So do we :
>> - create a demo folder ?
>> ( jboss-all/demo, jboss-3.0.0alpha/demo )
>> ( have some deploy by default
>> or
>> from there be able to do manual deploy drops )
>>
> That makes sense. actually I think they should all de
on 1-12-06 06.29, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is up with DefaultDS?
lubega.com is not writing out its server log in full -for the last test's
-so i do not know ...
hth
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
on 1-12-06 05.09, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I can think of two demos now : namely snoop.jsp and includeEJB.jsp that both
> are causing failiurs in the WebUnitTestSuite now ( well < yesterday ;-) )
> since they where not deployed ...
ahhh... my mistake WebUnitT
One could "color-correct" all the photos to go in a unified "filtered" look ! just a
suggestion ... if Julia(?) has time ... it would look so much more in line with how
the rest of the site is comming along.
JBoss Forums: JBoss Development: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/src/docs/pictur
on 1-12-06 06.05, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> the newlines are added by the sf footer, not by the forums... and are you
> smoking crack? green? I am sure if you mess with the tint on your monitor
> enough you could get them green...
ahhh ...
-oki - newlines no go ...
-i wish it
looks good - maybe just to many newlines at bottom before the sf list footer - and
could the links be green ? ...
JBoss Forums: JBoss Development: Testing reply urls...
View: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=4924
Reply: http://jboss.org/forums/post.jsp?forum=66&thread=4924
on 1-12-05 22.44, Bill Burke at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, and these examples should ship with the JBoss distribution. They
> should also be run with the nightly build so that we know whether or not
> they work. I think these examples are crucial now that the bulk of
> documentation will b
on 1-12-06 03.46, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> |and one request for the users of forum:
> |do quote (not over quote), otherwise your messages make very little sense
> |when read from the mailing list
>
> yes good point,
>
> "to quote or not to quote"
Could the post from forum hav
on 1-12-05 01.22, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I totally don't understand any of the emails you send. I don't mean to be
> offensive, I just don't get it.
hehehe - thats what *they* said about all the people -that actually changed
something -in our narrow frame of thinking ...
th
get it.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>
>> on 1-12-04 21.52, Julian Gosnell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> I updated my RH tree 1/2 an hour ago, made clen and rebuilt - no problems.
>>
>> Yes that is the way - b
on 1-12-04 21.52, Julian Gosnell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I updated my RH tree 1/2 an hour ago, made clen and rebuilt - no problems.
Yes that is the way - build - no probs -> but there seems to be some slack
here -and that is counterproductive inbeetwen - i build now - hurray ...
IMNSHO
/
Jason -this is very much alike what I experienced erlier yesterday ...
not in managment but in j2ee ...
on 1-12-04 06.48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> =
> ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega
>> Either way it sounds interesting, and I have been
>> sitting on my duff
>> long enough in here that I need to donate some stuff
>> back.
>>
>> Al
>>
>> Julian Gosnell wrote:
>>
>>> --- Peter Fagerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
on 1-12-04 16.30, Hicks, James at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I can relate to some points Ean Schuessler made. Now, I am not attacking
> anyone on this list or the JBoss Group, I just want to raise a few issues.
Yes -very good -use the jboss bussines list for those QA's - or lets set up
a "Heat"
on 1-12-04 04.41, Ean Schuessler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - Beyond the apparently successful training effort there is a developing
> focus on services.
badabingbadabong ...
Yes and You and Your Fourtune 500 service company is sharing ... hmmm ...
good
/peter_f
" Only fools se darkness i
on 1-12-04 03.55, Ean Schuessler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is the JBoss group a non-profit, not-for-profit?
You are still in the last century ? are You not ? it is a new dawn here !
glowing ...
/peter_f
" Only fools se darkness in the night
-
the wise se a vault of azure "
___
ter,
>
> I'm not sure what you are saying !
>
> Do you think there should be apps pre-deployed ?
>
> If so where - I removed them from '/' because i felt it might hinder people
> who
> wanted to deploy their own stuff.
>
> Jules
>
>
> Peter Fag
As earlier thread mentioned/suggested - both the test and 'kick start' would
*grow* tremendously by having some apps deployed from get GO ...
?
/peter_f
on 1-12-04 01.06, Julian Gosnell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Who is suggesting you hit these urls ?
>
> As bundled, Jetty comes with no ap
on 1-12-04 00.03, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> please provide a more verbose
> description of the problem.
it did not build at the time of post - somebody could check for history in
CVS or do a dp diff to find it -heheheh ...
Thanks
/peter_f
___
FYI : I just did a fresh checkout and it halts at j2ee
I do some clean up in the lab instead ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
on 1-11-30 04.59, David Maplesden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I got an improvement in the testsuite as well, but not quite that good. I
> guess we still have platform differences.
ahhh ... how so ? ...
Could You check it in with a runtime OS check ? ...
/peter_f
__
With David's fix - I just run-testsuite : result 182 tests with 1 error (XA)
Thanks
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
on 1-11-29 21.57, David Maplesden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> and it is happening because our resource and pooling
> code decides to destroy the connection when a statement
> from the connection throws an error.
could it not be left open ? ... that is :
-there is a connention from pool to db .
exception rather than a NPE.
>
> If there is no particular reason we are doing this then I will (try) to
> change the code so we don't do this!
>
> Guidence from someone who is familiar with this code would be appreciated,
> else I am going to bang on by myself and can
placeholders ... for stealth reasons ... ;-)
I changed my local copy to reflect -preference :
AS/400 - with 3000 Virtual Linux instances ...
Thanxs for the option
/peter_f
* 4.3 MB "Stockholm Contemporary" 1998 by ZKH *
http://www.ipagents.com/humanerror.mp3
on 1-11-27 07.53, Peter Fagerl
While pooking around i found and :
Uncommented body of deleteObject(pooledObject) - line 71 of
org/jboss/resource/connectionmanager.ManagedConnectionPoolFactory.java
(it seems this is called when the pool shrinks or is shut down.
some test -is shrinking the pool to [0/0/10] and as a effect the
Mmmm ... cool ...
and x-tra so -when it emulation enables my athalon linux to say that i am
running on a p4 with w2k ... ,-)
Thanxs
/peter_f
on 1-11-27 07.15, Andreas Schaefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> User: schaefera
> Date: 01/11/26 22:15:28
>
> Modified:src/main/org/jboss/management
User: peter_f
Date: 01/11/26 16:15:30
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/deployment
defaultjaws.xml
Log:
Removed InstantDB references and files
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +0 -64
jboss/src/resources/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/j
User: peter_f
Date: 01/11/26 16:15:30
Modified:src/resources/dbtest/META-INF jaws.xml
Log:
Removed InstantDB references and files
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +0 -63 jbosstest/src/resources/dbtest/META-INF/jaws.xml
Index: jaws.xml
=
User: peter_f
Date: 01/11/26 16:15:28
Modified:variabuild.xml
Log:
Removed InstantDB references and files
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +1 -16 contrib/varia/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
User: peter_f
Date: 01/11/26 16:15:28
Modified:jbossbuild.xml
Log:
Removed InstantDB references and files
Revision ChangesPath
1.51 +1 -5 build/jboss/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
R
User: peter_f
Date: 01/11/26 16:15:30
Modified:src/etc/conf/default standardjaws.xml
standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Log:
Removed InstantDB references and files
Revision ChangesPath
1.25 +1 -65 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/standardjaws.xml
User: peter_f
Date: 01/11/26 16:15:28
Removed: varia/src/main/org/jboss/jdbc InstantDBDatabase.java
InstantDBDatabaseMBean.java
Log:
Removed InstantDB references and files
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAI
I am about to remove all references and idb files - oki ? ...
The xa test has been broken in default cvs for a while since the DB2 ==
InstantDB is not bound !!! ... should the xa XATest have a common net xa DB
bound ? ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-developme
Why is the *slow* Java par with c/c**, in execution at times ? ...
Becouse it is
machinecocetranslatedjustintimewhateverthatmeansforUandYourbrother();
Word up ...
/peter_f
on 1-11-18 03.33, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> on 1-11-18 03.28, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTEC
101 - 200 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
