RE: [JBoss-dev] cvs lock waiting

2004-06-07 Thread Vesco Claudio
Chief Technology Officer > JBoss Inc. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Vesco Claudio > > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 1:25 AM > > To:

[JBoss-dev] cvs lock waiting

2004-06-07 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi alls! There is a lock on cvs :-( cvs update: [06:43:00] waiting for jboss-build's lock in /cvsroot/jboss/jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/jmx/loading/util ... cvs update: [08:22:35] waiting for jboss-build's lock in /cvsroot/jboss/jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/jmx/loading/util -- -- PRE

RE: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_2 WonderLand) Testsuite Results: 18-January-2004

2004-01-21 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi alls! I am working on org.jboss.test.jmx.test.EarDeploymentUnitTestCase: the test is not falling but the current implementation on EjbModule can give ClassLoader leak (WebClassLoader does not removed). I am also working to minimize the ClassLoaders leak, but this is another story. I try to exp

RE: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 Roadmap

2003-11-14 Thread Vesco Claudio
ssociation with the j2ee > component modules. > > -- > > Scott Stark > Chief Technology Officer > JBoss Group, LLC > > > Vesco Claudio wrote: > > > Hi alls! > > > > Sorry for my english... :-) > &g

RE: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 Roadmap

2003-11-13 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi alls! Sorry for my english... :-) I am also interested in working in the JACC area. I propose this roadmap: 1) implementing the required javax.security.jacc.* classes/interfaces in j2ee module. this javax.security.jacc.* does not depend on jboss 2) implementing a MBean that manage jacc

RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi alls! I think that in the current service implementation the only "way" to change a mbean attribute is a "restart" of the service. Why does not implementing the java bean event model (property change & co) in jmx... after all there is in the spec. I think that if I set a attribute to a mbean,

RE: [JBoss-dev] ATTENTION! Developers with CVS access

2002-12-13 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi Bill! > 1. What have you worked on in the past? connector architecture (jboss 2.2.x) bug fixes > 2. What are you currently working on? investigate security (not committed) jmx console (not committed): search & filter MBeans jboss with jdk1.4.1 / linux bug fixes > 3. What will you be working

RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: JDK 1.4 support?

2002-06-25 Thread Vesco Claudio
odules > could be loaded from other than the system classpath. I'll have > to think about how to get rid of the need for them rather than > how to keep them in synch. > > > Scott Stark > Chief Technology Officer > JBoss Group, LLC > xx

RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: JDK 1.4 support?

2002-06-24 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi alls! With jdk1.4.1(beta) there are compiler errors when compiling security javax/** (the security implementation is changed). For jdk1.4.1, do we need the hack to the java sun classes in security module? Claudio > -Original Message- > From: Jason Dillon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [JBoss-dev] I can't believe france is out of the world cup

2002-06-18 Thread Vesco Claudio
ise not to get pissed off when the spanish fury sieges > |the fields. > | > |You have been warned :-))) > | > |Vesco Claudio wrote: > | > |>Go Italy!!! > |> > |>uhmmm, can we change jboss-development in soccer-jboss? :-))) > |> > |>Claudio > |> > |&

RE: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss

2002-06-18 Thread Vesco Claudio
I think there are some settings (ant properties) in build.xml... You can see how to use jdk 1.3/4 in connector module. Claudio > -Original Message- > From: Dain Sundstrom [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:13 PM > To: JBoss-dev > Subject: [JBoss-dev

RE: [JBoss-dev] cmp2 relations, mbeans, and the testsuite

2002-06-07 Thread Vesco Claudio
between the lines... > -Original Message- > From: David Jencks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] cmp2 relations, mbeans, and the testsuite > > On 2002.06.07 03:03:41 -0400 Vesco

RE: [JBoss-dev] cmp2 relations, mbeans, and the testsuite

2002-06-06 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi! I think, I have corrected this problem in HEAD. But until now I haven't feedback. I don't think that we need a mbean to manage relationship, but I think that Dain can give us a better response :-) Claudio > -Original Message- > From: David Jencks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >

RE: [JBoss-dev] I can't believe france is out of the world cup

2002-06-06 Thread Vesco Claudio
Go Italy!!! uhmmm, can we change jboss-development in soccer-jboss? :-))) Claudio > -Original Message- > From: Sacha Labourey [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] I can't believe france is out

RE: [JBoss-dev] LocalManagedConnection.java Breaks Sybase

2002-06-05 Thread Vesco Claudio
manager rather than your client code. > > I think if the transaction mode is NEVER then autocommit will be on since > there is no managed transaction. > > > Sorry for the confusion > > david jencks > > On 2002.06.05 03:17:20 -0400 Vesco Claudio wrote: > >

RE: [JBoss-dev] LocalManagedConnection.java Breaks Sybase

2002-06-05 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi alls! This problem is triggered when it is called a stored procedure in sybase. The stored procedure must be defined with "chained transaction mode" or "anymode" sp_procxmode , 'anymode' If the sp is called in transaction (autocommit = false), the mode must be "anymode". I think that if th

RE: [JBoss-dev] [JL] Is it time for a new enterprise solution?

2002-04-26 Thread Vesco Claudio
I think that is better to have multiple conf files, this resolve the problems described by Sacha (deploy/redeploy). For the GUI problem, I think that we have already implemented jsr 77, we can start to implement jsr 88 and we can wait that SUN :-) extends netbeans to handle these specifications.

RE: [JBoss-dev] RC1 release branch occuring at 00:00

2002-04-19 Thread Vesco Claudio
OK, Claudio PS: I can do it now... :-) > -Original Message- > From: Francisco Reverbel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:36 PM > To: Vesco Claudio > Cc: David Jencks; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [J

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: build/jboss build.xml

2002-04-19 Thread Vesco Claudio
You beat me :-))) Claudio > -Original Message- > From: Francisco Reverbel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: build/jboss build.xml > > User: reverbel > Date: 02/04/19 06:24:58 > >

RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: Problem with ejb redeploy in remote interface in-server lookup.

2002-04-17 Thread Vesco Claudio
Uhm!?!? This is a IIOP problem. With CVS HEAD jdk 1.4 Windows NT I don't have this problem. Claudio > -Original Message- > From: David Jencks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:02 PM > To: Scott M Stark > Cc: David Jencks; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subje

RE: [JBoss-dev] RC1 release branch occuring at 00:00

2002-04-17 Thread Vesco Claudio
I have modified build/build.xml to copy iiop-service.xml in $JBOSS_HOME/server/default/deploy, I think Francisco missed it. To Francisco, can you keep in synch HEAD with and RC1? If not I can try to test yours patches with Branch_3_0 and I synchronize the repository. Francisco, I have tested you

RE: [JBoss-dev] Lets ditch the testsuite bin scripts

2002-04-17 Thread Vesco Claudio
I think that the target compile-bin in testsuite/build.xml must be removed or a if="HAVE_BIN_DIR" must be added. I cannot commit these patches because my current testsuite/build.xml is a lot modified. I think that we can remove the target "compile-bin". Or add near line 402 and modify

RE: [JBoss-dev] RC1 release branch occuring at 00:00

2002-04-17 Thread Vesco Claudio
Until yesterday these properties were setted (CVS HEAD tuesday) In my system at work these properties does not resolve the problems (Windows NT 4.0 + sun jdk 1.4) In current implementation of jacorb we need to load the org.omg.CosNaming._NamingContextExtSub from jacorb.jar and not from boot clas

RE: [JBoss-dev] Compile problem with iiop

2002-04-16 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi! If I remember well, this is a problem with rmic but I have encontered this problem in WindowsNT sun jdk 1.3. You have said that you are in linux and linux are the Francisco's main development platform. In WindowsNT sun jdk 1.4 this problem go out. In order to obviate to the problem you can

RE: [JBoss-dev] RC1 release branch occuring at 00:00

2002-04-15 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi alls! For the testsuite. In my local cvs repository I have removed the iiop tests from stress test case and added in a new target which sets the properties to make running the iiop part. These test are called from tests target. (I have written this some mails ago :-) ) When I have time I rete

RE: [JBoss-dev] Test Suite broken?

2002-04-12 Thread Vesco Claudio
rstand why testMultiThread2 kills jboss... Claudio > -Original Message- > From: Vesco Claudio > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:58 PM > To: 'Francisco Reverbel'; Vesco Claudio > Cc: 'Jason Dillon'; 'David Jencks'; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [JBoss-dev] Test Suite broken?

2002-04-12 Thread Vesco Claudio
the iiop sar. Claudio > -Original Message- > From: Francisco Reverbel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:22 PM > To: Vesco Claudio > Cc: 'Jason Dillon'; 'David Jencks'; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Test

RE: [JBoss-dev] Test Suite broken?

2002-04-12 Thread Vesco Claudio
L PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:45 AM > To: Vesco Claudio > Cc: 'David Jencks'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Francisco > Reverbel' > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Test Suite broken? > > Yes, I understand this is a JacORB issue... but I suggest that

RE: [JBoss-dev] Test Suite broken?

2002-04-12 Thread Vesco Claudio
11:07 PM > To: Vesco Claudio > Cc: 'David Jencks'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Test Suite broken? > > > > > > > > >export JAVA_OPT=-Dpolicy.expandProperties=false > >-Xbootclasspath/p:$JBOSS_HOME/lib/jacorb.jar > > &g

RE: [JBoss-dev] Exploded archive deployment

2002-04-11 Thread Vesco Claudio
Ehm, does this example deploy without the patch? I think that finding a relative container from a module is not implemented in current CVS HEAD. I have org.jboss.test.naming.test.EjbLinkUnitTestCase failing :-( Claudio ---

RE: [JBoss-dev] Test Suite broken?

2002-04-11 Thread Vesco Claudio
PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Test Suite broken? > > So what are the patches? > > david jencks > > On 2002.04.11 12:22:39 -0400 Vesco Claudio wrote: > > In my test bed with jdk 1.

RE: [JBoss-dev] Exploded archive deployment

2002-04-11 Thread Vesco Claudio
Jencks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:10 PM > To: Vesco Claudio > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Exploded archive deployment > > How about making this step in MainDeployer/SubDeployer mutually recursive? > so SubDeployer

RE: [JBoss-dev] Exploded archive deployment

2002-04-11 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi! Also I haven't looked yet the patch, but I have a proposal to the deployment system... I think we have problems with blind deploy of jar/ear/sar/war/... This problem is already met with war which are not unpacked because there is need a particular deployment by the web container. I think tha

RE: [JBoss-dev] Test Suite broken?

2002-04-11 Thread Vesco Claudio
In my test bed with jdk 1.4 I have only 5 failures + 63 errors. (CVS HEAD + some small patches) Claudio > -Original Message- > From: Chris Kimpton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Test Sui

RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net/IIOP and JBossMX integration

2002-04-04 Thread Vesco Claudio
ristoph [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:50 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net/IIOP and JBossMX integration > > Oh, I forgot to mention that I only looked at the JBoss.net code and > only under JDK1.3 ... &

RE: [JBoss-dev] Todo: multiple instances detection

2002-04-03 Thread Vesco Claudio
Uhm... We can't start also the web container... I don't think that we would start the web container with 8080+n :-( Claudio > -Original Message- > From: marc fleury [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 6:10 PM > To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge.

RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net/IIOP and JBossMX integration

2002-04-03 Thread Vesco Claudio
-Original Message- > From: Francisco Reverbel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:52 PM > To: Vesco Claudio > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net/IIOP and JBossMX integration > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Vesco Claudio wrote: &g

RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net/IIOP and JBossMX integration

2002-04-02 Thread Vesco Claudio
Ehm... When I try to compile the iiop module with jdk 1.4 I have this error that I try to bring back to memory since I have corrected it: at line 607 of iiop/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/iiop/server/IIOPContainerInvoker.java the exception WrongPolicy is not raised Does create_reference_with_i

[JBoss-dev] jboss-service

2002-04-02 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi alls! I think that with the recent cvs commit we need to patch jboss-server.xml with Index: jboss-service.xml === RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/jboss/src/etc/conf/default/jboss-service.xml,v retrieving revision 1.39 diff -c -r1.39 jbo

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS HEAD doesn't start with jdk 1.4 ?

2002-03-27 Thread Vesco Claudio
Sorry for my English :-) > -Original Message- > From: Peter Fagerlund [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:05 PM > To: Vesco Claudio; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS HEAD doesn't start with jdk 1.4 ? >

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS HEAD doesn't start with jdk 1.4 ?

2002-03-27 Thread Vesco Claudio
OK, I have recompiled in Windows NT jboss with jdk 1.4 and I have the exception. Quick and dirty hack: start jboss with JAVA_OPTS=-Dpolicy.expandProperties=false (see jboss.bat or jboss.sh) or modify conf/auth.conf + db/hypersonic/default.script as martin has written. Claudio __

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS HEAD doesn't start with jdk 1.4 ?

2002-03-27 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi alls! Have you recompiled with jdk 1.4? Claudio > -Original Message- > From: Ricardo Argüello [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:16 AM > To: Francisco Reverbel; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS HEAD doesn't start with jdk 1.4 ?

RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)

2002-03-22 Thread Vesco Claudio
L PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 7:56 PM > To: Vesco Claudio; 'Andreas Schaefer' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy) > > > > |-Original Message- > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |[mai

RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)

2002-03-22 Thread Vesco Claudio
2 7:15 PM > To: Vesco Claudio > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy) > > You @#! > > MEJB is not to be used this way > !! > > Don't ever use MEJB

RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)

2002-03-22 Thread Vesco Claudio
String, 1) ARGS[0] = URL("file:") SIGN[0] = URL.getName() mejb.invoke(ObjectName("jboss.system:service=MainDeployer"), "deploy", ARGS, SIGN) I LOVE JYTHON :-))) :-) Claudio PS: I am vEsco Claudio, Vasco is a famous italian singer :-))) > -Original Message

RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)

2002-03-22 Thread Vesco Claudio
ged not supported, but I think that jboss works equally > -Original Message- > From: David Jencks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 6:26 PM > To: Vesco Claudio > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke d

RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)

2002-03-22 Thread Vesco Claudio
ontext. > > Either that or we make deployment explicitly a transactional operation -- > a > good idea but not for today perhaps. > > david jencks > > On 2002.03.22 10:14:17 -0500 marc fleury wrote: > > > > > > |-Original Message- > > |From: [

RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)

2002-03-22 Thread Vesco Claudio
> > > > I really can't make sense of your story. > > > > marcf > > > > |-Original Message- > > |From: Vesco Claudio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > |Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:36 AM > > |To: Jboss Dev (Posta elettronica)

RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)

2002-03-22 Thread Vesco Claudio
-77, but in pdf jsr-77 there is no written restriction with bean-managed or container-managed transaction. Claudio > -Original Message- > From: marc fleury [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:01 PM > To: Vesco Claudio; Jboss Dev (Posta elettroni

RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)

2002-03-22 Thread Vesco Claudio
action of MEJB to "Bean" managed. Claudio > -Original Message- > From: marc fleury [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:33 PM > To: Vesco Claudio; Jboss Dev (Posta elettronica) > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deplo

[JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)

2002-03-22 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi alls! When I try to deploy an ear (better, an CMP entity) with MEJB I have an exception in org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCStartCommand because this class try to start a new transaction. The problem is that MEJB have a transaction management setting to default ("Container"). I think that

RE: [JBoss-dev] Multiple server configurations

2002-03-20 Thread Vesco Claudio
This is a very nice idea!!! Claudio > -Original Message- > From: marc fleury [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 6:09 PM > To: David Jencks; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Multiple server configurations > > |2. I thought marc had an id

RE: [JBoss-dev] Ordering part 2 :-)

2002-03-19 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi alls! I have only "ugly logs". If you ignore the exceptions I think that the problem is not resolved. Marc says to resolve the problem. I proposed a solution but this solution have future disadvantages :-( With the patches applied at MainDeployer I don't see problems in testsuite, but I do

RE: [JBoss-dev] Ordering part 2 :-)

2002-03-18 Thread Vesco Claudio
etc etc, but I don't know everything in jboss :-))) Claudio > -Original Message- > From: David Jencks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 6:05 PM > To: Vesco Claudio > Cc: Jboss Dev > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Ordering part 2 :-

RE: [JBoss-dev] Ordering part 2 :-)

2002-03-18 Thread Vesco Claudio
boss.xml :-) Claudio > -Original Message- > From: David Jencks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 5:22 PM > To: Vesco Claudio > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Ordering part 2 :-) > > Does this actually stop undeployment/redeployment or

RE: [JBoss-dev] Ordering part 2 :-)

2002-03-18 Thread Vesco Claudio
ut our sar packages inside ejb-jars so > they > could get deployed after the ejb-jar, whereas you can put an ejb-jar > inside > a sar to get it deployed before the sar. > > Please explain further. > > david jencks > > On 2002.03.18 04:19:56 -0500 Vesco Claudio wrote: &

[JBoss-dev] Ordering part 2 :-)

2002-03-18 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi alls! I think we have a little bug in MainDeployer. I'll try to explain the problem in my bad English :-( When I deploy & redeploy an ear I have an JSR-77 exception (javax.management.InstanceNotFound) because: deploy init init current deployer invoked

RE: [JBoss-dev] User TX bug

2002-03-13 Thread Vesco Claudio
Ahem, I have commited the change :-) > -Original Message- > From: marc fleury [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:15 PM > To: Vesco Claudio; Jboss Dev (Posta elettronica) > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] User TX bug > > yes we should re

[JBoss-dev] User TX bug

2002-03-13 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi alls! I think we have a little bug in server/src/main/org/jboss/tm/usertx/server/UserTransactionSessionImpl.ja va which I have triggered when I try to control user transaction by jython :-) In begin method there is a tm.suspend but in commit nor rollback there is no tm.resume. If there is no

RE: [JBoss-dev] [PATCH] Cannot compile Jetty Plugin in HEAD

2002-02-01 Thread Vesco Claudio
I have compiled jetty plugin with JVM Sun 1.3.1 but I have the same problem :-( The patch resolves the problem... java -version java version "1.3.1" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.1-b24) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.1-b24, mixed mode) Claudio > --

RE: [JBoss-dev] Is Monday still a good 2.4 freeze date

2001-06-18 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi! I think I dont have rw access to cvs repository :-( Claudio > -Original Message- > From: Toby Allsopp [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 3:40 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Is Monday still a good 2.4 freeze

RE: [JBoss-dev] Is Monday still a good 2.4 freeze date

2001-06-15 Thread Vesco Claudio
My patches to implement JCA deployment are applied? :-) > -Original Message- > From: Scott M Stark [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 10:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Is Monday still a good 2.4 freeze date > > This is just a suprious

[JBoss-dev] Castor in lib/ext and common classloader

2001-06-01 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi alls! Why there is castor-0.9.1 in lib/ext? This jar is added in the common classloader path and so when I try to deploy and redeploy my castor RAR module I have problems to reinitialize castor (reloading the new DB mapping). Another problems... Is it possible to separate the common classlo

RE: R: R: R: [JBoss-dev] CX + Castor

2001-05-08 Thread Vesco Claudio
you don't want to use it? > > Thanks > david jencks > > On 2001.05.08 03:40:40 -0400 Vesco Claudio wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > >I'm not sure I understand all of your description of your rule > engine > > >requirements but from what I do under

RE: R: R: R: [JBoss-dev] CX + Castor

2001-05-08 Thread Vesco Claudio
>Hi, >I'm not sure I understand all of your description of your rule engine >requirements but from what I do understand I think they can be handled by >what I wrote, jbossrules. I would be interested in seeing a more detailed >explanation of what you are trying to do and may be interested in >im

RE: R: R: R: [JBoss-dev] CX + Castor

2001-05-08 Thread Vesco Claudio
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 05:39:30PM +0200, Vesco Claudio wrote: >> Problems: >> >> where is called >> org.opentools.minerva.connector.*ConnectionManager.enlistExistingConnect >> ion -> I cant reuse an existing connection :-( >The enlistExistingConnection meth

R: R: R: [JBoss-dev] CX + Castor

2001-05-07 Thread Vesco Claudio
opp [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Inviato: lunedì 7 maggio 2001 9.58 > A:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oggetto: Re: R: R: [JBoss-dev] CX + Castor > > Vesco Claudio wrote: > > > Thank you for the commiting... > > > > I have some problems to integrating Casto

R: R: [JBoss-dev] CX + Castor

2001-05-07 Thread Vesco Claudio
there is another project, jbossrule, but I dont like too much. > -Messaggio originale- > Da: Toby Allsopp [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Inviato: sabato 5 maggio 2001 9.07 > A:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oggetto: Re: R: [JBoss-dev] CX + Castor > > Vesco Claudio

R: [JBoss-dev] CX + Castor

2001-05-04 Thread Vesco Claudio
t this works for me. > > This does seem to be hard to find at the moment! > > Have you fixed the "can't undeploy and redeploy a rar" problem? If so, > thanks!! > > Again if so, this fixes bug 415516, please note this in your patch > submittal. > >

[JBoss-dev] CX + Castor

2001-05-04 Thread Vesco Claudio
Hi all! Sorry for my bad english :-) I have done a little patch to jbosscx (ZipFile close exception) and I have converted castor 0.9.2 to JCA architecture, now I can deploy and redeploy rar and ejbs using castor jdo resources... (I don't use contrib/castorjdo). Can I post the patches to this l