[JBoss-dev] Ulf Schroeter/BDF/Mobilcom ist außer Haus.

Ich werde ab 08.03.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 22.03.2004. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel

[JBoss-dev] Ulf Schroeter/BDF/Mobilcom ist außer Haus.

Ich werde ab 08.03.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 22.03.2004. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel

[JBoss-dev] Ulf Schroeter/BDF/Mobilcom ist außer Haus.

Ich werde ab 08.03.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 22.03.2004. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel

[JBoss-dev] Ulf Schroeter/BDF/Mobilcom ist außer Haus.

Ich werde ab 08.03.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 22.03.2004. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel

[JBoss-dev] Ulf Schroeter/BDF/Mobilcom ist außer Haus.

Ich werde ab 08.03.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 22.03.2004. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel

Antwort: RE: c/s JBossMQ status, was: [JBoss-dev] JBossMQ rewrite

The current JMS rewrite by Nathan, Adrian, and Bela is going quite well and we will be replacing the old system in the fall. Don't work on a codebase that is going to be retired and needs to live in depracated mode for awhile. A refactoring isn't what is needed in the JMS subsystem. I don't want

Antwort: Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: default web server

Hi Frank, can you give some more detailed informations about your 'much better' experiences with Jetty ? Would be interesting ! Regards Ulf Frank Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 27.06.2003 03:05 Bitte antworten an jboss-development An:[EMAIL

[JBoss-dev] default web server

Has jetty been replaced by tomcat-41 (jbossweb-tomcat41.sar) as default webserver in latest Branch_3_2 ? Regards Ulf

[JBoss-dev] performance drop

When running a grinder entity bean loadtest against JBoss-3.2.2RC2 we realize a significant performance drop ever 60 seconds for 2-5 seconds. Obviously there is some periodic background processing. Has anybody an idea what kind of process is causing this drop ( garbage collector ? ) Regards Ulf

Antwort: RE: [JBoss-dev] performance drop

Thanks for the link , but GC was just meant as illustration :-) In fact I think that most probably another JBoss internal background process is causing this drop Healey, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 24.06.2003 12:57 Bitte antworten an jboss-development

Antwort: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBossMQ rewrite

Hi Nathan, thanks for the information. I already have seen your first CVS code. Is there any further information available about the planed design and feature set ? You already gave some interesting insights about the p2p feature. When using jms in an enterprise production environment - as we

[JBoss-dev] JBossMQ rewrite

Can anyone give me some informations about the current state of the announced rewrite of JBossMQ for JBoss 4 ? Does it still make sense to implement needed features on the current JBossMQ implementation ? I don't want to spend time on something that gets nuked in short time :-) Regards Ulf

[JBoss-dev] JSR77 OBJECT_NAME

JSR77 specifies in JSR77.3.1.1.1 parent-j2eeType as required key property for OBJECT_NAME. I don't see this property as part of the ObjectName attribute of a managed object via JMX console. Just filtered or not implemented ? Regards Ulf

[JBoss-dev] JSR77 OBJECT_NAME

Please forget last question, I think I got it ! ( Sometimes reading the next page helps :-) Sorry Ulf

[JBoss-dev] Updates to CVS-Branch and CVS-Head

Should all updates (bugfix/feature) for a branch also be applied to HEAD ? There are some updates that have only been applied to Branch_3_2, although they don't seem to be specific only for that Branch. According to my ( not very sophisticated... ) understanding of JBoss branch policy these

Antwort: RE: [JBoss-dev] Updates to CVS-Branch and CVS-Head

Ok, but just for info: is my assumption right, that updates to a branch without also applying them to HEAD will not show up in the following branch ? Regards Ulf Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06.06.2003 13:39 Bitte antworten an jboss-development

[JBoss-dev] CVS-Update fails

When trying to update my local JBoss-Head-CVS-snapshot from within Eclipse on Windows2000 I get the following ( I gues Eclipse) error message The resource 'thirdparty/jython/jython/lib/' could not be created because another resource exists whose path differs only by case The cvs output log