Another question:
Are you using the precompiler? Or load time? or both?
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853950#3853950
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853950
Thanks Kabir,
It's working now!
Andre
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853948#3853948
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853948
---
This
It does look like it is aop$classAdvisor$aop. Static initialization should always
happen, not sure why it isn't in this case.
would it be possible to put together a small test case we can reproduce the problem
with?
Apologies,
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?mo
Caller invocations should be able to reference the called and calling object.
You can currently reference the called object by getTargetObject. We should add a
getCallingObject method to CalledByMethod invocation classes.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?modul
The first sentence should have been:
You cannot get the calling object but you can get the calling Class.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853946#3853946
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=38
calling Class.
Caller invocations are for use in cases where the execution pointcuts cannot be used,
and this functionality is not present in the "normal" execution invocations either. In
my opinion interceptors should not know anything about the caller object, but I could
be convinced :-)
I'l
Hi,
Does this help?
|
|
|
|
|
1) java system classes cannot be instrumented so caller pointcuts must be used. The
reflection aspect was written for this, so use 'call' instead of 'execution'.
2) Everything must use fully qualified names. Even stuff in the java.lang pack
The memory is not released. What is created is Javassist data structures. I can't
release the memory because class transformation happens at class load time. A class
may be transformed, then another class that references that transformed class may have
joinpoints affected by that transformati
JBoss has passed certification awhile ago now.
The J2EE TCK tests do not test the behavior in question and there are no plans to
implement any strict constraints or stricter verifier.
FYI, it seems Chiba has implemented synchronized blocks, so your fix is scheduled for
the next AOP release.
B
anonymous wrote : I suggest using the precompiler because currently, load-time
transformation is a HUGE memory hog.
I'm nearly finished an alternative load-time which has a much better memory footprint.
I've been working on a different version of the classpool that doesn't store the same
info
Bill Burke wrote : It will only show bindings for LOADED classes. If you execute the
code, you should see the bindings.
|
You are right, my advice is bound when I instantiate a class and everything works as
expected.
Bill Burke wrote : I suggest using the precompiler because currently, load-
Of course, J2EE TCK may not explicitly reference Aspects or AOP instrumentation. I
even wonder if J2EE will ever talk about AOP as it may sound a little too
invasive/disruptive to let bean developers to play with.
But does JBoss plan to implement the strict constraints of J2EE constructs especia
The console is a little weird...
It will only show bindings for LOADED classes. If you execute the code, you should
see the bindings.
If you execute the code, and the aspect is is UNBOUND in the webconsole, then there is
a bug in the webconsole.
ANOTHER THING:
By default, class load time tr
Thanks for your attention Bill,
AspectJ sintax is something like this:
public aspect Inheritance {
| declare parents: (junit.framework.TestCase+ && !junit.framework.TestCase &&
!test.CustomTestCase) extends test.CustomTestCase;
| }
that means "classes that extends TestCase and not equals
I should say: What do you WANT the semantics to be, since this is your feature
request :-)
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853804#3853804
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853804
--
FYI, this isn't implemented, just discussing how to implement...
What do you think the semantics should be? And what does AspectJ support in this
regard?
Thanks,
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853788#3853788
Reply to the post :
http:
Bill,
In my opinion the sintax is ok (very useful to me!). My question is: "MySuperClass
must extend the class MyTestCase extends" is a JBoss AOP limitation or just a
implementation choice?
Andre
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853784#3853784
You are correct, it is a bug, we'll get right on fixing this.
apologies
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853778#3853778
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853778
--
You can scope your HiveMind deployments. You cannot scope JBoss AOP deployments.
Check out the JBoss AS docs on how to do this.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853657#3853657
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=p
I see the usecase for this. It would be trivial to implement, but let's argue on the
correct syntax and contract.
|
|
The rules are that MySuperClass must extend the class MyTestCase extends.
Anything else?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewto
"ad-rocha" wrote :
| I have some test cases implemented using JUnit, so these classes (Test1, Test2)
| extends TestCase. I've created a new class (MyTestCase) that extends and modify
| TestCase default implementation, adding new fields and methods.
|
|
| Compiling with AspectJ I ca
i meant also to say that this should work in JBoss AOP
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853441#3853441
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853441
--
well, you're gonna have to post the JBoss AOP example...
JBoss AOP Aspects can hold state. An instance of the Aspect is created depending on
the scope. PER_VM, PER_CLASS, PER_INSTANCE< PER_ JOINPOINT.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853
copy the jboss-service in jboss-aop.deployer. I screwed up the dist target, apologies
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853438#3853438
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853438
--
thx
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853408#3853408
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853408
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase
Hi Kabir,
I'm migrating from AspectJ to JBoss AOP and my implementation use this approach.
I have some test cases implemented using JUnit, so these classes (Test1, Test2)
extends TestCase. I've created a new class (MyTestCase) that extends and modify
TestCase default implementation, adding new
Great!
$cvs checkout jboss-head
All the documentation for AOP is stored as docbook under:
jboss-head/aop/docs/reference
There is the userguide, reference and quickref. Each has a subdirectory for each
language. At the moment there is only en(glish).
To build the documentation go to the
jboss
thank you, just duplicate the aopc line seems to make things working (for the report
ut it should be ok), thank you.
Jean-Yves
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853388#3853388
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=p
Hmm, sounds horrible :-) Do you have a proper use-case for this, or are you just
playing around to see what the capablilities are?
If you mean you want to make C extend B instead of A, that is not possible. JBoss AOP
does not introduce any new keywords into the Java language, all instrumentation
Hi,
At present it is up to you to specify the classpath properly.
For the report to work you need to run the aopc task twice, first with report="false"
(to instrument the files), and then with report="true" (to create the report). e.g:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Kabir,
I have 3 classe (A, B and C). B extends A and C extends A. I'd like to make C extends
B...
Is there a way to do it using JBoos AOP?
Thanks,
AndrÃ
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853378#3853378
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss
Hi,
You cannot force a class to extend another, but you can use a mixin class.
Cheers,
Kabir
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853372#3853372
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853372
By the Way,
My E_mail(MSN): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853365#3853365
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853365
--
Bill,
I am insterested in translating all of JBoss AOP Documents[Reference Guide/User
Guide/Quick Reference,et.] into Chinese.
My name is Shifei Luo(the translator of ,be published by PHEI of China).
How about begining the perfect work?
thx.
View the original post :
http://w
No, the j2ee certification did not involve aspectized deployments using the jboss AOP
framework.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853306#3853306
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853306
--
Yes, we will eventually fix this problem. It will take awhile because it requires
changes to Javassist to suport synchronized blocks. The synchronization is needed
otherwise you have problems with concurrent access to a POJO.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?modu
Hum... thanks!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853302#3853302
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853302
---
This Newsletter Sponsored by:
Does the J2EE 1.4 TCK certification encompass deployment of J2EE applications that are
aop-compiled using JBoss-AOP ?
I'm hoping there will be a plausible resolution to this issue as it impacts our usage
of JBoss AOP to a great extent.
Thanks
Rajiv
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.o
Because aspect also has a scope attribute which by default is PER_VM
|
|
Its also important because an aspect can take configuration as well.
Check out this doco:
http://docs.jboss.org/aop/aspect-framework/reference/en/html/xml.html#xml-aspect2
View the original post :
http://www.jbos
Thanks Bill, it's working now.
But why have I to referece the aspect if the advice tag define the aspect class?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853295#3853295
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=r
you need to declare the Aspect in XML before referencing it.
|
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853293#3853293
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853293
--
Sorry... the correct method name in MyInstrumentation is instrument, not invoke
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853290#3853290
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853290
-
The SystemProperty jboss.aop.path can take multiple XML files. They are deployed in
the order you specify in the jboss.aop.path.
Also, jboss.aop.path can take a directory. If you specify a directory, it will load
all *aop.xml files in that directory.
The include is a bug though and we'll fix
Hi!
No problem. But it's essential for me to have "included" entities.
Say you have a product line and some already developed aspects, and want to include A,
B, C concerns for configuration 1 of application, and only A and C for 2nd
application.
The only way, I think is to have two separate X
A workaround is to take out the include.
I'll have to put this on the TODO list.
Thanks for finding the bug and reporting,
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853202#3853202
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=p
I'm pasting the exact error message from weblogic
weblogic.ejb20.compliance.ComplianceException: In EJB
com.ascential.asb.service.test.greetingService.GreetingService, Enterprise Bean
methods must not use thread synchronization primitives. The method named
_setInstanceAdvisor(org.jboss.aop.Inst
Are you saying that Weblogic and Websphere barf if you have declared a method as
synchronized?
The synchronized methods are not on EJB business methods or callbacks, so I fail to
see how it violates the specification.
All the specification says is:
"An enterprise bean must not use thread synch
No, it does not. It is on the TODO list and will be in a future release of JBoss AOP.
If you're interested in implementing it, please do. We'll give you CVS access to
commit your changes if you implement it.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtop
So... declare error and declare warning exist in JBoss AOP?
AndrÃ
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852948#3852948
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3852948
--
"ad-rocha" wrote : Hi,
|
| Has JBoss AOP a construction like Aspectj "declare error"?
|
| Thanks,
|
| Andre
Hi
Don't ask here for AspectJ like features ;) Authors will answer you:
anonymous wrote : "Please use provided solution if you want to have 'declare
warning/error' function
Your pointcut expression is incorrect and will not match any methods on
PreparedStatement.
It should be:
|
|
|
|
This matches every execute method on PreparedStatement. You'll have to provide the
full method pattern to do more fine-grained interception.
Bill
View the
I like declare error and declare warning. We cannot soften exceptions because JBoss
AOP is not an extension of the Java language, but rather 100% java.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852923#3852923
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.
If you mean the stuff in "Warnings and Errors" and "Softened Exceptions", the quick
answer is no.
I'll check with Bill if this is something we could/should add.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852922#3852922
Reply to the post :
http://www.jbo
With declare error is possible to specify compilation errors for static crosscutting:
http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/indextech.cgi/~checkout~/aspectj-home/doc/progguide/semantics-declare.html#d0e6417
AndrÃ
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852917
Hi,
I'm not that familiar with AspectJ, can you please elaborate on what you would like to
achieve?
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852913#3852913
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3
oops!! It was a mistake in my code. I've fixed it and the interceptor is working
fine. Thanks for your help. :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852665#3852665
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=re
What VM are you running on? I cannot see anything wrong with your code or XML..
Are you sure it is not your problem? They NPE seems to be coming from your own code.
When running with JBoss AOP 1.0.0 Final, do you get the line number for this line:
|
com.apple.ist.rubyservice.communicatio
Thanks. I tried with jboss-aop_1.0.0-FINAL. I modified the MethodInterceptor.java
file of method-execution example, that has come along with the jboss-aop distribution.
I've included the jars in jboss-32-install folder of the installation, while
compiling through aopc task.
However, the Null
There is no InvocationResponse class. I think you are reading the old O'Reilly
article or using the wrong download package? It should be JBoss AOP 1.0.0 FINAL? Try
modifying an existing tutorial distribution.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3
Andre, thanks for your patience If you have any further bug fixes or enhancement
ideas, please don't hesitate to post on the forum!
Thanks again,
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852572#3852572
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.o
It's working now. Thank you
AndrÃ
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852568#3852568
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3852568
---
This S
Got the files, and you need to set fork=true in the javac task:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise, it executes as part of the java process executing ant, effetively ignoring
the java.system.class.loader property, since that is only checked on the first call to
java.lang.Clas
For verbose mode set the system property jboss.aop.verbose to true, i.e
You can send them to me at kabir.khan a jboss.org
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852552#3852552
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=po
This is what I expected. It is definately a bug, and I've pushed the fix out to CVS.
Here's a brief rundown on what's going on:
The first time you use something from a supplied plugin (in this case, the New AOP
Project Wizard), Eclipse starts up that plugin by calling a method "start" within the
Still not working (again)...
Is there a verbose mode?
Is there a way to send to you the files?
Thanks,
AndrÃ
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852495#3852495
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p
Note the pakage names:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852493#3852493
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3852493
--
Thanks, but still not working...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852492#3852492
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3852492
---
This SF.net
Try:
|
|
|
|
|
|
If that doesn't work, try renaming the teste.xml to teste-aop.xml
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852491#3852491
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=
AOP xml:
|
|
|
|
|
Ant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
View the original post :
http://www.jb
Class:
package teste;
public class HelloAOP {
public void callMe() {
System.out.println("AOP!");
}
public static void main(String args[]) {
new HelloAOP().callMe();
}
}
Aspect:
package teste;
import org.jboss.aop.advice.Interceptor;
import org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.Invocation;
pu
Post some more info
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852487#3852487
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3852487
---
This SF.net email is spon
Hi,
I'm trying the reference guide example, and create a Ant project to do loadtime
weaving (I don't want to precompile). It's not working... the result is "AOP!" (not
"Hello, AOP!")
Any ideas?
Thanks,
AndrÃ
Marshall,
The Wizard ONLY works if I open all projects in workspace and restart Eclipse. I don't
see any relation between existent projects and the new one...
Is it a bug?
Thanks,
AndrÃ
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852483#3852483
Reply t
When you opened the project, did you restart Eclipse? The exception is happening on
plugin loadup time (eclipse startup).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852478#3852478
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&m
I receive the same error independent of AFTT project status (opened/closed)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852475#3852475
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3852475
-
anonymous wrote : Root exception:
| org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.ResourceException: Resource /AFTT is not open.
| at
org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Project.checkAccessible(Project.java:126)
| at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Project.hasNature(Project.java:456)
|
!SESSION Out 24, 2004 08:58:19.62 --
eclipse.buildId=I200406251208
java.version=1.4.2_03
java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc.
BootLoader constants: OS=win32, ARCH=x86, WS=win32, NL=pt_BR
!ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi Out 24, 2004 08:58:19.62
!MESSAGE An error occ
!SESSION Out 24, 2004 08:58:19.62 --
eclipse.buildId=I200406251208
java.version=1.4.2_03
java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc.
BootLoader constants: OS=win32, ARCH=x86, WS=win32, NL=pt_BR
!ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi Out 24, 2004 08:58:19.62
!MESSAGE An error occ
Can you post the Eclipse log? It should be in the .metadata directory of your eclipse
workspace location. Only post the relative entry, not the whole thing ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852462#3852462
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss
Hi,
depending on which loadtime method you want to use
http://docs.jboss.org/aop/aspect-framework/reference/en/html/running.html
you basically just pass in a system property/jvm argument. The examples shown are for
running off the command line, but you do exactly the same for the ant task.
Vi
Sorry... not aspectwerks.bat
I'm looking for a Ant task to make Loadtime instrumentation. Precompiled
instrumentation is shown in:
http://docs.jboss.org/aop/aspect-framework/reference/en/html/compiling.html
But there is no information about Loadtime...
Thanks,
AndrÃÂ
View the original post :
This will be in the release. If the files portion of the java command is longer than a
given number of chars, it creates a temp file as outlined.
I don't know what the limits are, so I have added a maxsrc parameter to the ant task.
The default is 1000
View the original post :
http://www.jboss
Be careful.
Windows is only notionally POSIX compliant.
It defines a POSIX compliant interface, but it does not use it internally (e.g from
the command line/shell) and most WIN32 apis ignore it as well.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852146#385
ThanksI really do appreciate it.
Personally, I think following Ant's lead and hardcoding it 4096 as the threshold is
fine -- that is the number that POSIX defines as the limit.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852114#3852114
Reply to the po
Bill,
Looking at the source of the javac task -- it appears that Adrian's solution is
exactly what they do. When the user wants to fork the process, and the command line is
>4096, it outputs it to a temp file, and passes that to the compiler.
When you don't fork via with javac, there is no prob
Bill,
You bring up a good point. I saw your comment about using javac as the basis for the
code.
In my same ant task, I also compile the same set of code using javac with no issues.
Weird.
I understand about getting 1.0 out --- I can look tonight at the differences and why
javac would work an
I wonder if the javac target in Ant has the same problem as I based aopc on this code.
I will try and resolve your request...We need to release 1.0 this week as other JBoss
Inc. projects are waiting on it so I can't promise anything.
But, this is a serious usability bug, so I'll put cycles into
The usual fix for this is to allow a
--SOURCEFILES [file-name]
to be passed in to the compiler.
If the length of the file names is too large it can write them to a temp file
and pass --SOURCEFILES [tmp-file-name]
The other fix is to not use Windows :-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss
Wanted to give an update on this for what I found.
It is definetly an issue related to the length of the command that is passed to
Runtime.exec.
To experiment, I changed the path that my class are build from long path
c:\eclipse\workspace\myproj\bin
to something very short:
c:\a
Worked grea
That's Bill's decision he is the project lead.
I think you'll find he is busy on the 1.0 release at the moment.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851911#3851911
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p
No, that is incorrect. Nothing implements the home interface (not even customer
finders and home methods) The EJB container handles home invocations dynamically or
these methods are implemented in methods on the Bean class as ejbFindMETHOD or
ejbHomeMETHOD methods.
Bill
View the original po
Would you mind creating a AOP-user forum to use then?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851907#3851907
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3851907
---
Do I understand it correctly, that the HomeInterface is implemented by a proxy? If so,
would a $implements (like the $instanceof one) help to do something like
pointcut="call($implements(javax.ejb.EntityHome->findBy*(..)) ?
I think a $implements expression would be nice anyway. :-)
View the o
No, it is not possible with JBoss AOP. The reason? It is because there is no class
to massage...Our EJB implementation does not generate any class that implements the
home interface. If you implemented BMP customer finders or home methods on the bean
class, then yes, JBoss AOP could be used.
"Bill Burke" wrote : Squeak, does deploying an EAR alone with precompiled classes not
work? It should. A .aop file is not needed.
Sorry, Bill. I haven't tried it yet, mainly because I am still having issues witt the
AopC ant task mentioned in the other thread.
Also, I am trying to fundemental
We will work on precedence after the 1.0 release. We're currently trying to close
bugs and finish documentation.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851895#3851895
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=repl
Squeak, does deploying an EAR alone with precompiled classes not work? It should. A
.aop file is not needed.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851894#3851894
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p
Hi!
I've seen some announcement of 1.0 final release of JBossAOP next week. How did
you/are you going to clear things up with advice/aspect/annotations precedence?
Tomasz
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851879#3851879
Reply to the post :
htt
Yes, there are two parts to this.
First the copiletime/loadtime instrumentation of the bytecode is done (done by the
compilers)
Next, when running the instrumented app, the aop info must be present since it
contains the info for building the Class-/InstanceAdvisors that contain what aspects
a
That helps, thanks a lot.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851824#3851824
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3851824
---
This SF.net email i
101 - 200 of 656 matches
Mail list logo
