[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Unable to install the JBOSS PLUGIN in Eclipse

2004-05-21 Thread Kegel
jdmsai wrote : Hi, | I am having similar problem. | I can access http://jboss.sourceforge.net/jbosside/updates on a browser. | But in eclispe, it says Unable to access http://jboss.sourceforge.net/jbosside/updates when I use the update manager following the installation guide. | |

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Unable to install the JBOSS PLUGIN in Eclipse

2004-05-19 Thread jdmsai
Hi, I am having similar problem. I can access http://jboss.sourceforge.net/jbosside/updates on a browser. But in eclispe, it says Unable to access http://jboss.sourceforge.net/jbosside/updates when I use the update manager following the installation guide. Any Idea? View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Unable to install the JBOSS PLUGIN in Eclipse

2004-05-11 Thread letiemble
Hi, Very strange indeed. Now the only way to upgrade, is to download the zip bundle. Go on the JBoss Sourceforge project page and choose the JBoss-IDE release. You should see the Files section with the bundle. Laurent. View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Unable to install the JBOSS PLUGIN in Eclipse

2004-05-11 Thread bklinghagen
If ezz232 is going by the Installation Guide provided on the website, then the issue he is running into is that Sourceforge no longer uses that format. The Installation Guide says to use http://jboss.sourceforege.net/jbosside/updates/, but Sourceforge has changed the format to

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Unable to install the JBOSS PLUGIN in Eclipse

2004-05-11 Thread letiemble
Hi, The URL you put in your message is incorrect. You have mistyped it. I have checked a few minutes ago that the URL in the Installation Guide is correct and works. For informations, the URL is : http://jboss.sourceforge.net/jbosside/updates Laurent. View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Unable to install the JBOSS PLUGIN in Eclipse

2004-05-11 Thread bklinghagen
Well, the URL doesn't work for me, and I have nothing wrong with system configuration or DNS configuration. The following information is taken directly from the Sourceforge site, note the structure of the URL reference. This is the only way I can reference projects on Sourceforge. If I type in

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Unable to install the JBOSS PLUGIN in Eclipse

2004-05-11 Thread bklinghagen
BTW, the paragraph from the Sourceforge website was pulled from this URL (note the URL structure): https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=11085group_id=1 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3834466#3834466 Reply to the post :

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Unable to install the JBOSS PLUGIN in Eclipse

2004-05-11 Thread bklinghagen
Here is the error message received when trying to use the URL as specified in the document. I have tried this multiple times, and will continue to try, but it won't work because it is the WRONG FORMAT ACCORDING TO THE SOURCEFORGE SITE. Network connection problems encountered during search.

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Unable to install the JBOSS PLUGIN in Eclipse

2004-05-11 Thread letiemble
Hi, We are not talking about the SourceForge project page (which, I agree, is formed the way you described as in the documentation). The JBoss-IDE update site is located on the SourceForge project website. Take a look at the doc :

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Unable to install the JBOSS PLUGIN in Eclipse

2004-05-11 Thread bklinghagen
As I've said, they timeout, whether through the Eclipse Update manager, or through the browser. The only way I can connect to the Sourceforge site is using the format specified by Sourceforge in that paragraph. I used to be able to access each project the way you've specified last year, but

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: Unable to install the JBOSS PLUGIN in Eclipse

2004-05-11 Thread bklinghagen
Well, I found some Sourceforge documentation that specifies that the http://projectname.sourceforge.net URL should be supported. But it doesn't work. I have no issues with any other website or portal site. I have no problems when I use the aforementioned URL structure, only with the URL