Hi,
I am currently developing a frontend for creating and editing
EJB deployment descriptors. I started the project one and
a half week ago.
A preview version is currently available at my website (many
things are not yet implemented):
http://www.joyful-noise.de/jbossgui
(Sorry for the german s
GUI.
Have fun - Mad Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Wei-ju Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 9:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] A new user interface for JBoss
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am currently developing a fro
> I am starting to create a management GUI see project
> JBossMGT but right now I am only working on making
> JBoss manageable but have no clear idea how to create
> the GUI.
Do you need some help on that point ? I could spend some time
thinking about it if I know how it should be used.
> Theref
Hi
- Original Message -
From: "Wei-ju Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] A new user interface for JBoss
> > I am starting to create a management GUI see project
> > JBossM
efer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] A new user interface for JBoss
>Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 19:03:14 -0700
>
>Hi
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Wei-ju Wu" <[EMAIL PROT
hi everybody,
this is my first posting to jboss-dev. I hope to contribute some code to
Jboss someday:oP
> Yes, I could need some help. Right now I postponed the design
> for a GUI because I am focused on implementing the server
> stuff.
> There are two things right now I would need:
> - Design o
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] A new user interface for JBoss
>
> Anreas,
>
> Quick FYI for anybody starting up a new GUI tool/IDE
>
> Just wanted to let you know that IBM is opening the core of WebSphere
Studio
> (in the near future) Not sur
]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] A new user interface for JBoss
> hi everybody,
>
> this is my first posting to jboss-dev. I hope to contribute some code to
> Jboss someday:oP
>
> > Yes, I could need som
hi again:)
> Hi
>
> The general idea is that JBoss implements JSR-77 and the management
> GUI uses the JSR-77 interfaces. Therefore the client does not have
> to know much about JBoss.
>
oki.. I will start playing around with JSR-77.
> I will try to consolidate the positions and ideas on the JBo
t whether Swing, or WML/HTML...
That would be a lot of work though.
Wei-ju
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] A new user interface for JBoss
on 1-08-08 19.05, Jacob Andresen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> JbossMGT client could run on your mobile phone :oP
Yes ... design in a PresenterFactory interface in front of the JSR-77
interface that can be used by a JMX, HTML, WAP, anyOtherProtocol client
classes to generate (transcode) the dat
Sorry, I don't quite understand .. what was so bad about the ejx approach?
I recognized ejx as a _generic_ powerful, simply to use framework for
building xml-editors. I think, it would be a better idea, to build upon the
existing editors and make them more user friendly, verbose and fool prove.
8, 2001 6:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] A new user interface for JBoss
>
>
>
> Sorry, I don't quite understand .. what was so bad about the
> ejx approach?
> I recognized ejx as a _generic_ powerful, simply to use framework for
> bui
D]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] A new user interface for JBoss
>
>
> on 1-08-08 19.05, Jacob Andresen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > JbossMGT client could run on your mobile phone :oP
>
> Yes ... design in a PresenterFactory interface in front of the JSR-77
> inte
Now I am really confused - not just but really ;-)
You say that MGT will use EJB as communication instead of JMX as bus ?
I can se a PresentationFactory using EJB as collector of data before it
delegates to its HTML, Wap, Swing or whatHaveU for presentation specific
processing, but for MGT of JB
on 1-08-08 19.39, Schaefer, Andreas at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - we have a dedicated, stripped-down application server
> running the management server
Should'ent all servers in one domain be able to be the MGT server for that
instance domain ? - dynamic swap for service/fail over ?
/peter_f
ions about
how to use JMX with JSR-77 but I don't know where they
are heading to.
Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Fagerlund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 11:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] A new user interf
> on 1-08-08 19.39, Schaefer, Andreas at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > - we have a dedicated, stripped-down application server
> > running the management server
>
> Should'ent all servers in one domain be able to be the MGT server for that
> instance domain ? - dynamic swap for service/fail ov
ent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 12:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] A new user interface for JBoss
>
>
> on 1-08-08 19.39, Schaefer, Andreas at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > - we have a dedicated, stripped-down application server
> > runni
on 1-08-08 22.03, Schaefer, Andreas at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe you have a farm of app. servers w/o a Servlet Engine but
> you need one for the MGT server.
Scenario :
- I have two machines running JBoss with servlet engines for failover and
loadbalance purposes ! - I would not run one o
Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Fagerlund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 1:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] A new user interface for JBoss
>
>
> on 1-08-08 22.03, Schaefer, Andreas at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Schaefer, Andreas wrote:
> Did you work with EJX. I tried to use it and it has some
> nice features but in the case of EJX (at least for me) it
> is too complicated and NO docu.
> I liked the idea of using Beans and the Bean Framework but
> the actual version of EJX is clunky
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Schaefer, Andreas wrote:
> When you want to reanimate EJX please do so but keep in
> mind that this is a big job and we need someone dedicated
> to it.
on 1-08-10 09.16, Holger Engels at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BTW, where are the sources for the EjbJar ResourceManager? I onl
Peter Fagerlund wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Schaefer, Andreas wrote:
> > When you want to reanimate EJX please do so but keep in
> > mind that this is a big job and we need someone dedicated
> > to it.
> on 1-08-10 09.16, Holger Engels at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > BTW, where are the sources fo
on 1-08-10 13.28, Rickard Öberg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Some of the EJX parts is closed source ...
>
> EJX is OpenSource, BSD license. What parts do you think are closed
> source?
some dreambean stuff - or that was my understanding :
1) becouse it is mentioned on this list (old JBossGUI
Peter Fagerlund wrote:
> some dreambean stuff - or that was my understanding :
> 1) becouse it is mentioned on this list (old JBossGUI = closed source)
That's a lie. It's BSD. Download source from
http://dreambean.com/ejx.html
> 2) when i looked at the distro could not find source - lot of barfi
on 1-08-10 14.19, Rickard Öberg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>> some dreambean stuff - or that was my understanding :
>> 1) becouse it is mentioned on this list (old JBossGUI = closed source)
>
> That's a lie. It's BSD. Download source from
> http://dreambean.com/ejx.html
Peter Fagerlund wrote:
> I was refering to : Re: [JBoss-dev] EJX and XML
> on 1-06-25 19.30, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > yes EJX doesn't really belong here anymore. Also rickard is not supporting
> > it, it doesn't really work, and finally they are com.dreambean classes not
> > JB
Hm, it is not the code that made me think of a complete
rewrite, it's (IMHO) its non-existence of usability and
user-friendliness which lies in its concept.
Furthermore, the advanced options of EJB 2.0 and
JBoss >= 2.4 are not supported.
I think user interfaces should be developed more from the
On 2001.08.10 09:43:36 -0400 Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>
> heh ...
>
> This now gives me the opportunity to then *repete* what has been
> mentioned
> before - a general clean up in the module structure - where We do not
> have
> *one ant lib per module* for ex. - would be welcome ... (also that som
On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Wei-ju Wu wrote:
> Hm, it is not the code that made me think of a complete
> rewrite, it's (IMHO) its non-existence of usability and
> user-friendliness which lies in its concept.
>
> Furthermore, the advanced options of EJB 2.0 and
> JBoss >= 2.4 are not supported.
>
> I th
31 matches
Mail list logo
