User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/18 08:36:52
Modified:src/etc class.java interface.java
Log:
Guidelines for coders in JB3.0
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +106 -32 jboss/src/etc/class.java
Index: class.java
User: schaefera
Date: 01/07/19 18:03:13
Modified:src/etc class.java interface.java
Log:
Adjusted the identation to the specified indentation of 3 spaces.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +77 -72jboss/src/etc/class.java
Index: class.java
User: schaefera
Date: 01/12/01 13:29:45
Modified:src/etc class.java interface.java
Log:
Fixed the problem with Jetty on Windows as well as remove the obsolete
DataCollector from the J2eeDeployers.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +32 -40jboss/src/etc/class.java
Ok, I'm failing to stay out of this argument once again. Crap.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 08:36:52AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>/*
> - * JBoss, the OpenSource EJB server
> - *
> - * Distributable under LGPL license.
> - * See terms of license at gnu.org.
> - */
> +* JBoss, the
I agree with Toby here on most points. I do think that it is a good idea to
have an agreed upon style, though I think that should be a guide only,
leaving it up to the programmer to make the final decision (if it violates
the standard it should be documented why it does so).
How about using the
|>/*
|> - * JBoss, the OpenSource EJB server
|> - *
|> - * Distributable under LGPL license.
|> - * See terms of license at gnu.org.
|> - */
|> +* JBoss, the OpenSource EJB server
|> +*
|> +* Distributable under LGPL license.
|> +* See terms of license at gnu.org.
|> +*/
|
|I agree with Toby here on most points. I do think that it is a
|good idea to
|have an agreed upon style, though I think that should be a guide only,
|leaving it up to the programmer to make the final decision (if it violates
|the standard it should be documented why it does so).
uh let me s
ste - I bow to the divine in you
~
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.filip.net
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
>fleury
>Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 5:37 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE
> |
> |Also, if you are going to do this, put some HTML in there so that the
> |javadocs are readable.
>
> That is a good idea, require that the Revisions change be HTML readable...
> good call.
>
Then why not use a custom javadoc tag so that revisions can be included
or not depending on the lev
PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/etc class.java interface.java
> >Sorry, it is a *very* clear need. And CVS just doesn't cut it.
>
> can't we, uhm you (I'm not a committer:), use some sort of tag which makes
> CVS automatically insert the comment and a
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 08:24:12PM -0400, marc fleury wrote:
> |>/*
> |> - * JBoss, the OpenSource EJB server
> |> - *
> |> - * Distributable under LGPL license.
> |> - * See terms of license at gnu.org.
> |> - */
> |> +* JBoss, the OpenSource EJB server
> |> +*
> |> +* Distrib
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 5:41 PM
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/etc class.java
> interface.java
>
>
> > >Sorry, it is a *very* clear need. And CVS just doesn't cut it.
> >
>
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:49:57PM -0400, Bill Burke wrote:
> Does anybody use emacs? We should have a java-mode specific to jboss.
Does anybody *not* use emacs? They wouldn't admit it anyway. Unless they
use vi.
I have a jboss style from when the standard was 3 spaces. If there's
interest I
Hi,
> How about using the Java Coding Standard by Sun?
yes, most people have seen that, it's easy to get
by looking at http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/,
many people already follow it.
> other open source projects ... have been mostly 4 (spaces).
yes, 4 columns indent clearly, everything hang
My IDE doesn't seem to support 'cowboy neal!' as an indent, is that some new
Java thing?
"how many spaces do you use in your identation
0(!)
1
2
3
4
1024
cowboy neal!"
and I am pretty the majority of answers is "cowboy neal"...
2 spaces sounds great!
___
Hi,
I'd like to see it
thanks
(wishing for 4 spaces and open brackets up one line)
david jencks
On 2001.06.18 22:08:08 -0400 Toby Allsopp wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:49:57PM -0400, Bill Burke wrote:
> > Does anybody use emacs? We should have a java-mode specific to jboss.
>
> Does anybo
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 04:19:23AM +0200, Georg Rehfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > How about using the Java Coding Standard by Sun?
>
> yes, most people have seen that, it's easy to get
> by looking at http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/,
> many people already follow it.
>
> > other open source projects
> I have a jboss style from when the standard was 3 spaces. If there's
> interest I can post it (when I get home) along with instructions on
> how to automatically activate it when editing JBoss sources.
I am interested to know how I can tell [X]Emacs to move to a quanta of 2
when editing JBoss
|Ok, but 2 spaces do not read well on a 1600x1200 21" screen with a
|12pt font. 3 spaces is the minimum readable size for this configuration.
ok 3 then, :)
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/list
Toby Allsopp wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:49:57PM -0400, Bill Burke wrote:
>
>>Does anybody use emacs? We should have a java-mode specific to jboss.
>>
>
> Does anybody *not* use emacs? They wouldn't admit it anyway. Unless they
> use vi.
>
> I have a jboss style from when the standa
On Tuesday 19 June 2001 04:08, you wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:49:57PM -0400, Bill Burke wrote:
> > Does anybody use emacs? We should have a java-mode specific to jboss.
>
> Does anybody *not* use emacs? They wouldn't admit it anyway. Unless they
> use vi.
>
> I have a jboss style from
On 19 Jun, Toby Allsopp wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:49:57PM -0400, Bill Burke wrote:
>> Does anybody use emacs? We should have a java-mode specific to jboss.
>
> Does anybody *not* use emacs? They wouldn't admit it anyway. Unless they
> use vi.
>
> I have a jboss style from when the s
Hi,
Discussing coding style is sooo much easier than
actually coding...
3 spaces (and no TABs!!!) is fine with me.
As for the revision history within the source file:
Using the CVS $Log$ tag is not a good idea: It was
shortly discussed about half a year ago, and the
idea was abandoned. Often
Filip Hanik wrote:
>>Sorry, it is a *very* clear need. And CVS just doesn't cut it.
>>
>
> can't we, uhm you (I'm not a committer:), use some sort of tag which makes
> CVS automatically insert the comment and audit info into the actual code
> file?
> I know this is doable with CVS
> any thought
24 matches
Mail list logo
