nal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 5:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
>
> Man did I open a can or worms.
>
> I am going to p
david
>
> --jason
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 4:21 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Dillon
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 4:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
>
> I think we might have to create our own interface which exposes the
1.4
We need to support it until J2ME upgrades to 1.4, and considering they
are not quite at 1.3 yet, it will be a couple of years.
-dain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1.3 has to be supported as long as 1.4 doesn't work with jboss
> (problems include Classcastex. in port.rem.obj.narrow and nullpointe
ginal Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 4:21 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
>>
>>On 2002.06.18 18:56:26 -0400 Jason Dill
:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 4:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
>
> On 2002.06.18 18:56:26 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote:
> > It is a trade off, either complex build or fancy pro
your problem.
david jencks
>
> --jason
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 3:32 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re:
1.3 has to be supported as long as 1.4 doesn't work with jboss (problems include
Classcastex. in port.rem.obj.narrow and nullpointer on ear with war inside on jetty)!
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 11:12:30AM -0500, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> How are we handling JDK 1.4 use in JBoss? I want to use some
ridiculous.
--jason
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 3:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
>
> Doing something fanc
s
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:05 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
> >
> > I don't see how to compile something on 1.3 that calls a method that
> is
> > not
> > in the jdbc 2 spec, but i
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, David Jencks wrote:
> I don't see how to compile something on 1.3 that calls a method that is not
> in the jdbc 2 spec, but if you have a reference to an example of how to do
> what you suggest I'll take a look.
>
> IMO reflection is worse than a preprocessor.
>
> david jenck
2:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
>
> I don't see how to compile something on 1.3 that calls a method that
is
> not
> in the jdbc 2 spec, but if you have a reference to an example of how
to do
> what you suggest I'll take
CTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:51 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
> >
> > There is preprocessing for the local tx wrapper. If its compiled in
> 1.3
> > it
> > sh
nal Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:42 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
> >
> > compile on jdk 1.4, the local
n use a preprocessor.
>
> --jason
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:42 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev]
t; [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
>
> compile on jdk 1.4, the local wrapper gets the 1.4 jdbc 3
>
> compile on jdk 1.3, you get jdbc 2
>
> do
rsion issues...
sucks, those pompous bastards.
--jason
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use
e used.
>
> --jason
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:06 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [JBoss
compile on jdk 1.4, the local wrapper gets the 1.4 jdbc 3
compile on jdk 1.3, you get jdbc 2
done with ant filtering to put/not put comments around jdbc 3 code.
I think the xa stuff doesn't wrap the stuff with jdbc 2 to 3 changes.
david jencks
On 2002.06.18 12:12:30 -0400 Dain Sundstrom wrote
:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:13 AM
> To: JBoss-dev
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
>
> How are we handling JDK 1.4 use in JBoss? I want to use some of the
new
> JDBC 3.0 APIs, but they are only in JDK
ubject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
>
> Since we are doing preprocessing of the source, are we going to have
two
> releases, one for 1.3 and one for 1.4?
>
> -dain
>
> Vesco Claudio wrote:
> > I think there are some settings (ant properties) in build.xml..
; Claudio
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Dain Sundstrom [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:13 PM
>>To: JBoss-dev
>>Subject: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
>>
>>How are we handling JDK 1.4 use in JBoss? I want to
ct: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
>
> How are we handling JDK 1.4 use in JBoss? I want to use some of the new
> JDBC 3.0 APIs, but they are only in JDK 1.4.
>
> We still need to support JDK 1.3 for a long time, so how are we handling
> this.
>
> -dain
>
> --
How are we handling JDK 1.4 use in JBoss? I want to use some of the new
JDBC 3.0 APIs, but they are only in JDK 1.4.
We still need to support JDK 1.3 for a long time, so how are we handling
this.
-dain
--
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect JBossCMP
JBoss Group, LLC
24 matches
Mail list logo