-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex
>> Loubyansky
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:56 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>>
>>
>> I meant specifying them in XDo
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 3:27:16 PM, you wrote:
DLR> This can be used to test beans and so on. It runs inside JBoss.
DLR> I have a very simple prototype of this, and I will make it avaliable
DLR> tomorrow.
Install this SAR to a simple example :
http://www.danilo.floripa.com.br/script
day, January 15, 2003 10:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
>
> I meant specifying them in XDoclet style, not XML.
>
> /**
> * @classAttr
> */
> class MyClass {
>
> /**
> * @fieldAttr
> */
> private i
Hi,
Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 6:19:23 PM, you wrote:
ws> And what would be the goal for that?
ws> Could you give examples?
I have another idea scripts use inside JBoss.
The discussion here is to deploy scripts and then a deployer will converted
they to MBean/Session beans and so on.
My ide
lement?
In the forum or here.
Thanks,
alex
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Bill Burke
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
>
>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:01 AM
> To: Dain Sundstrom
> Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
>
> I also thought about support class/method/field level metadata
> attributes for aspects deploying the source file this way.
> But this could be a limiting solution
heme to use.
Just a thought. Maybe JMX and such is the way to go. Just want to
give you
something to think about.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
julien viet
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:31 AM
To: SourceForge.net
Subject: [JBoss
ld
>> use a URL fragement and JSP:Include to decide what theme to use.
>>
>> Just a thought. Maybe JMX and such is the way to go. Just want to
>> give you
>> something to think about.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>
, 2003 4:19 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: JBossScript was RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>> And what would be the goal for that?
>> Could you give examples?
>>
>> regards,
>> WS
>>
>> --- marc fle
TED]
> Subject: RE: JBossScript was RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
>
> Hello,
> And what would be the goal for that?
> Could you give examples?
>
> regards,
> WS
>
> --- marc fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : >
> dain :)
> >
> > marcf
> >
>
n
> > Behalf Of Bill Burke
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:32 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: JBossScript was RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
> >
> >
> > Anybody want to take this on? Could be an
> interesting
> > project. I thi
what about "Nukes on JBoss" shortname nukes4j ?
JB> JBossNuke ?
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>> julien viet
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:35 PM
>> To: Bill Burke
>>
JBossNuke ?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> julien viet
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:35 PM
> To: Bill Burke
> Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
>
> ok, do you have a name shorter t
dain :)
marcf
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Bill Burke
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: JBossScript was RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
>
> Anybody want
bill, you are about as blue blood system as it gets, you are the one
doing AOP inline and staring at the SUN... stop recommending stuff for
content developers. Again module developers, even in PHP, are of a
different caliber and it is not that bad. They can deal with an
MBean... let it be, trust
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
I think you are dreaming, if you think you will every recruit php
developers to any java based solution
tisdagen den 14 januari 2003 kl 20.16 skrev Dain Sundstrom:
I was thinking of the script based MBean support Sacha added, and I
thought can we make plain old java work like a scripting language.
Here is what I came up with:
+ The user writes a class BlahService.java
+ This source file is
f Of Bill
> Burke
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
>
> Its a good idea. Anybody want to implement this? JBossScript we can call
> it.
>
> Bill
>
> > -Original Message-
> > Fr
t: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:40 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>>
>>
>> I am all for JMX if it works . Also the idea is to port the modules we
>> like bit by bit to the sar format and this is CLEARLY a microkernel job.
>> I
PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
>
> I think you are dreaming, if you think you will every recruit php
> developers to any java based solution. Ben, remember the Orielly OS
> convention? The php guys are perl guys.
>
> -dain
>
> On Tu
Its a good idea. Anybody want to implement this? JBossScript we can call
it.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain
> Sundstrom
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
>
> I am all for JMX if it works . Also the idea is to port
]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
> I think you are dreaming, if you think you will every recruit
fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nathan Phelps
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
> I would think that we'd
> I would think that we'd want to make this a J2EE application
> so it can run on ANY J2EE application server.
no we wouldn't.
> Therefore, I
> would elect to go down a pure J2EE route instead of a JBoss
> only JMX route.
JMX will be J2EE.
Nathan wake up.
marcf
---
1.3 compliant if they want, and reciprocate the code back..
Let Jboss shine!
Go Julien Go!
James
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathan Phelps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
J2EE route instead of a JBoss only JMX route.
NP> -Original Message-
NP> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NP> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben
NP> Sabrin
NP> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:04 PM
NP> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NP> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
f Ben
Sabrin
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
Are we developing this for the PHP community or the Java community? Or
more important for the JBoss community? To me it seems that it would
depend on who you are targeting for your user base
n
> Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
>
> I think you are dreaming, if you think you will every recruit php
> developers to any java based solution. Ben, remember the Orielly OS
PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
The only negative comment I have in using JMX is that the PHP
community
may
have a tough time switching over to Nukes on JBoss if you
to think about.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
julien viet
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:31 AM
To: SourceForge.net
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
hi folks,
JNuke adventure has started.
After analysis of PostNuke I've b
needs.
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Burke
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:51 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>>
>> The only
B> Bill
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>> julien viet
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:31 AM
>> To: SourceForge.net
>> Subject: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>>
>>
>> hi fo
needs.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Burke
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
> The only negative comment I have in u
IL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
>
> The only negative comment I have in using JMX is that the PHP
> community may
> have a tough time switching over to Nukes on JBoss if you have to have a
> package structure like a SAR or a WAR. I hate to say it, but do
o give you
something to think about.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> julien viet
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:31 AM
> To: SourceForge.net
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>
>
> hi folks,
&
Julien,
Makes sense so far
> 3.PostNuke is all about invoking module functions.
>Url like index.php?module=User&op=register means
>that the PN must call the method register on module User.
>For me that means that the servlet retrieves the mbean
>under the name jnuke:publicmodul
I do simply with a ThreadLocal :
Page.getPage() and you can output HTML
even though have ServletRequest and Response.
I do like that because the request thread goes
through modules, blocks, and themes
and it's a mess that each one pass some parameter
when calling another one.
julien
JH> Julien
hi folks,
JNuke adventure has started.
After analysis of PostNuke I've began the development, still early though.
I keep everything that's good in PostNuke and throw all the shit away :
modules, blocks, permissions system, url system and themes.
JMX is used for PostNuke components : themes,
39 matches
Mail list logo
