Great, let us know when you have something to look at.
--jason
Quoting Peter Fagerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> on 07-04-2 23.48, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> It growed on me to be able to have all listerners
> >> (NAME:PORT) registred in a component for easy access
> >> by o
on 07-04-2 23.48, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> It growed on me to be able to have all listerners
>> (NAME:PORT) registred in a component for easy access
>> by other components, to be able to understand
>> what ports are running in the WM and be JMX intra-machine
>> negotiation capa
> It growed on me to be able to have all listerners (NAME:PORT) registred in
> a
> component for easy access by other components, to be able to understand
> what
> ports are running in the WM and be JMX intra-machine negotiation capable.
>
> what do You think ? ...
I think it is a good idea also
on 07-04-2 09.30, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> If one uses ones own ServerSocket and connection threads that use the
>> hsqldb.Database class directly - then We do not need to touch the hsqldb
>> code and have more controll over the listeners in JBoss ... this is how the
>> Avalon p
> They are looking at supporting embedded using our patch - they may go
> another road and/or just be inspired by what We used ... they do want to
> have something supporting embedded ... how and when I do not know ...
Hopefully they will find a solution soon.
> If one uses ones own ServerSocke
on 04-04-2 22.42, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does this mean that 1.7.0 has better embedable support so we don't have
> to hack up the dist to make it work with JBoss? I didn't look at the
> new stuff, so I don't have a clue... but I am hoping that is what it means.
They are look
Does this mean that 1.7.0 has better embedable support so we don't have
to hack up the dist to make it work with JBoss? I didn't look at the
new stuff, so I don't have a clue... but I am hoping that is what it means.
I am simply concered that with the current impl we don't really have
much co
on 04-04-2 03.13, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Where are the patched sources for the JBoss HSQLDB? Does anyone know if
> the 1.7.x version is flexible enough to use it out of the box? If not,
> could whoever patched it in the first place try to get those changes
> commited... assu
Where are the patched sources for the JBoss HSQLDB? Does anyone know if
the 1.7.x version is flexible enough to use it out of the box? If not,
could whoever patched it in the first place try to get those changes
commited... assuming they are not completly JBoss specific.
If the patch is JBos
