ED]>
|To: "Trawick, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
|"Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net"
|<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge.
|Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:22 PM
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JB
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge.
Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:22 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
> mr trawick james,
>
> suck my dick
>
> marcf
>
>
> |-Original Message--
age-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> |Trawick, James
> |Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:33 PM
> |To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net; Jboss-User@Lists.
> |Sourceforge. Net
> |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOS
Does it really matter that the wiki be j2ee? What about one just based on servlets?
I expect that we will want to run a Java based system too... though that is kind of a
shame, since there are lots of PHP apps out there which could complement JBoss.org.
Anyways, I just took a quick look at th
> For what its worth I think the best format for something
> like this would be
> a wiki, so that updating it doesn't need to involve cvs
> commits and
> rebuilding the website. Ideal would be a version
> controlled j2ee wiki
> running in jboss/jetty;-) Marc hasn't been thrilled yet
> with this
OTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of marc
fleury
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 6:27 AM
To: Jeff Tulley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
yes,
david pitched it at boston, and i already said that this would be
interesting as part of the jbos
f Of
> David Jencks
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
>
>
> I think it would take someone locating or writing a j2ee based wiki that
> works fine on jboss/jetty, demonstrating
Hi,
On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 06:29, David Jencks wrote:
> I think it would take someone locating or writing a j2ee based wiki that
> works fine on jboss/jetty, demonstrating it somewhere, and getting marc to
> say "that looks good, lets do it"
http://www.webmacro.org/AboutThisSite
Seems to work ra
ch 15, 2002 12:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
I think it would take someone locating or writing a j2ee based wiki that
works fine on jboss/jetty, demonstrating it somewhere, and getting marc
to say "that looks good, lets do it"
forge. Net
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
>
>
>
> |real, because we've already sold at least a 100 copies of the clustering
>
> 468
>
> marcf
>
> ___
> Jboss-development maili
f
|Tulley
|Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:52 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
|
|
|What would it take to get a wiki up and running? I think that is a very
|good idea. It is worth experimenting with, anyway. Something like that
|is incremental a
hursday, March 14, 2002 2:16 PM
> |To: David Ward
> |Cc: Mac Rinehart; Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net;
> |Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
> |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
> |
> |
> |Very true - the online doc right now says it's for 3.
r services by Mac
> > Rinehart
> > and/or Sextant Technology Consulting, Inc. is contingent upon an
> > agreement
> > in writing and signed by all interested parties.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mai
; agreement
> in writing and signed by all interested parties.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
David
> Jencks
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-use
-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net;
|Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
|
|
|Very true - the online doc right now says it's for 3.0, but hasn't been
|completely updated yet. Meanwhile it isn't right for 2.4.x anymore
|either. Core te
-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
|
|
|Not unfounded, personally proven.
|
|In any case there needs to be some sort of kickstart and executive summary
|for the new JBoss features. If it means that I'll finally get the answers
|I'm looking for without holding for three hours and/or
|real, because we've already sold at least a 100 copies of the clustering
468
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
David Jencks wrote:
> ...
>
> "In order to support the development of JBoss and ensure that the
> documentation remains up to date, we offer a PDF version of the JBoss book
> to be published by SAMS publishing. "
>
> Following the link also brings you to the Comperehensive Documentation
> Subscr
nology Consulting, Inc. is contingent upon an
> agreement
> in writing and signed by all interested parties.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
> Jencks
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTEC
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
Ummm
In your previous post you wrote
"I've seen a lot of
complaints
in the forums regarding th
ark of Sextant
> Technology Consulting, Inc. Any agreement to render services by Mac
> Rinehart
> and/or Sextant Technology Consulting, Inc. is contingent upon an
> agreement
> in writing and signed by all interested parties.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Ward
nt@Lists. Sourceforge. Net; Jboss-User@Lists.
Sourceforge. Net
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
It doesn't always lag - sometimes it's too eager! Example: I had a
gripe that 2.4 documentation started disappering off the web site, being
replaced with 3.0 documentati
Very true - the online doc right now says it's for 3.0, but hasn't been
completely updated yet. Meanwhile it isn't right for 2.4.x anymore
either. Core team members have said that 2.4.x is going to be around for
a long time, I think it would behoove us to keep the documentation
available, at l
It doesn't always lag - sometimes it's too eager! Example: I had a
gripe that 2.4 documentation started disappering off the web site, being
replaced with 3.0 documentation when 3.0 was only alpha. I think that
the 2.4 docs should stay available online - at least until 3.x goes final.
Mac Rin
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net; Jboss-User@Lists.
Sourceforge. Net
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
Not unfounded, personally proven.
In any case there needs to be some sort of kickstart and executive
Cc: 'marc fleury'; Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net;
Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
Subject: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
What I'm really interested in is the more corporate questions (we're still
battling for JBoss over Weblogic, and clustering
I think that documentation for corportate types will always be
of the for-pay variety. It just takes too much time to produce
that level of documentation, and it also isn't the sort of thing
that developers tend to enjoy well enough to donate the required time.
Now if anybody knows an open-source
ssage-
From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Trawick, James
Cc: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net; Jboss-User@Lists.
Sourceforge. Net
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
Clustering docs are available for purchase.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Trawick, James
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:28 PM
> To: 'David Ward'
> Cc: 'marc fleury'; Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net;
> Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
> Subject: [J
What I'm really interested in is the more corporate questions (we're still
battling for JBoss over Weblogic, and clustering is a real sore point). How
does JBoss 3 clustering interact with web container clustering? If they're
completely separate (which I'm pretty sure is the case, as it was last
A combination of these has served well enough for me:
Online docs: http://www.jboss.org/online-manual/HTML/index.html
Forums: http://main.jboss.org/
User List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/jboss-user%40lists.sourceforge.net/
David
--
Trawick, James wrote:
> Will the final release act
> > Will the final release actually include documentation?
>
> JBossCMP will and already does.
Thank you JBossCMP. I'm asking about the all new stuff, like clustering and
distributed containers and all the other stuff I read about on the site in
Marc's interview. Until there's some sort of avai
Trawick, James wrote:
> Will the final release actually include documentation?
JBossCMP will and already does.
> (btw, whoever you went with to sell your JBoss 3 docs should be shot. i
> went through their process several times, they said they had problems and
> would get back to me. they
Will the final release actually include documentation?
(btw, whoever you went with to sell your JBoss 3 docs should be shot. i
went through their process several times, they said they had problems and
would get back to me. they never did. just saying that unless JBoss 3 has
some form of access
34 matches
Mail list logo
