Rickard Oberg wrote:
> Bill Burke wrote:
>
>> Nope. I guess when you come from the CORBA world to EJB, everything
>> looks
>> powerful. The packaging, (jars, wars, ears, and with jboss, sars) is
>> just
>> not available in the CORBA world. That's what its all about man.
>> Packaging, inte
Bill Burke wrote:
> Nope. I guess when you come from the CORBA world to EJB, everything looks
> powerful. The packaging, (jars, wars, ears, and with jboss, sars) is just
> not available in the CORBA world. That's what its all about man.
> Packaging, integration, configuration, and deployment.
lopment@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Separating JMX/EJB
>
>
> can'tturn off the freaking email.
>
> |The real power
> |of EJB is in the packaging and deployment.
>
> you on dope?
>
> marcf
> |
> |Bill
> |
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:11 PM
> To: Bill Burke; Rickard Öberg
> Cc: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Separating JMX/EJB
>
>
> can'ttu
can'tturn off the freaking email.
|The real power
|of EJB is in the packaging and deployment.
you on dope?
marcf
|
|Bill
|
|
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss
Sorry to chime in so late, but I have a few comments...
Firstly, from Rickard.
> I intend to write a whitey on it some day too, but basically it goes
> something like this:
> * Meta-programming is good, but not inherent to EJB
> * The EJB programming model in general is flawed. (See EJB-INTEREST
marc fleury wrote:
> |What an utterly stupid remark.
>
> Laaa laa la laa laaa laa !
>
> ( I am not listening )
Hehe.. you're so screwed... awhh.. why do I even bother.. :-)
> |Because..?
> |1) Bean A uses bean B. B dies, but C that implements the same interface
> |is still alive. Now what's
|Hehe.. you're so screwed... awhh.. why do I even bother.. :-)
As much as I really love to argue with you I really want to work on RH and
put it out, but these discussions are down the road, really I extend the
invitation again, I will try to get you to come to one of the trainings.
|Alright, y
|What an utterly stupid remark.
Laaa laa la laa laaa laa !
( I am not listening )
|What I meant was: MP is good, EJB has it, but it's not the only way to
|get MP.
La! la ! la! la! la! la!
|> could it be because "experts" are donkey-dick-sucking-monkeys that don't
|> know their ass from their
marc fleury wrote:
> |I intend to write a whitey on it some day too, but basically it goes
> |something like this:
> |* Meta-programming is good, but not inherent to EJB
>
> true, but a sophism
>
> "You are intelligent, but intelligence is not inherent to Rickard Oberg (I
> am intelligent as we
|I intend to write a whitey on it some day too, but basically it goes
|something like this:
|* Meta-programming is good, but not inherent to EJB
true, but a sophism
"You are intelligent, but intelligence is not inherent to Rickard Oberg (I
am intelligent as well), does that make Rickard Oberg du
marc fleury wrote:
> we agree on the metaprogramming, we are going to make it dynamic too,
>
> some other day I will publish a white paper :) Let Rickard fire first
I intend to write a whitey on it some day too, but basically it goes
something like this:
* Meta-programming is good, but not in
11:21 AM
> To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] Separating JMX/EJB
>
>
> kids,
>
> we are hearing a lot of talk about EJB and not EJB and blabla
> bla. Well I
> will say that I am a big fan of the framework, for reasons
> that ev
|Amen.
|
|FWIW, I think the major advantage of the EJB framework over e.g. using JDO
|is that, especially in the jboss environment, it is very simple to do
|(limited) meta-class programming. The EJB spec uses this for transactions
|and security, Scott uses it for Security Proxies, I have used it t
Amen.
FWIW, I think the major advantage of the EJB framework over e.g. using JDO
is that, especially in the jboss environment, it is very simple to do
(limited) meta-class programming. The EJB spec uses this for transactions
and security, Scott uses it for Security Proxies, I have used it to appl
esday, November 14, 2001 9:21 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Separating JMX/EJB
> kids,
>
> we are hearing a lot of talk about EJB and not EJB and blabla bla. Well I
> will say that I am a big fan of the framework, for reasons that even our
> favorite aliens are missing ;-) but that is an
kids,
we are hearing a lot of talk about EJB and not EJB and blabla bla. Well I
will say that I am a big fan of the framework, for reasons that even our
favorite aliens are missing ;-) but that is another thread.
The reason I want EJB to take a backseat in the "LAYOUT OF THE CODE" is that
I bel
17 matches
Mail list logo