the jmx module unit tests are the ones we run against, the ones in
testsuite were never maintained.
At least 3 of the 4 failures on compliance are known issues (and reported
as such), I don't know about the JMX 1.2 notification emitter one.
The two errors are both related to classloading, at lea
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juha
Lindfors
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jmx unit tests
the jmx module unit tests are the ones we run against, the ones
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juha
> Lindfors
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 10:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jmx unit tests
>
>
> the jmx module unit tests are the ones we run against, the ones in
> testsuite were never maintained.
>
> A
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juha
> Lindfors
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 10:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jmx unit tests
>
>
> the jmx module unit tests are the ones we run against, the ones in
> testsuite
wrote:
>
> > What are the other 3 known compliance issues? 3.2 and head should be in
> > synch
> > on class loaders and I need to merge some of the changes made to the jmx
> > layer so I want to get these test working before doing the merge.
> >
> >
> &g
tark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juha
Lindfors
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] jmx unit tests
JBOSS-HEAD:
/cygdri
logy Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juha
Lindfors
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jmx unit tests
the jmx module unit tests are the
