> Aha! At least there's something we can agree on!
I may be too dense in my understanding of the TX stuff right now so have
patience. I may/may not have a point.
> >
> > As far as remoting goes. The SimpleMetaData class does have the means
> > now
> > to define whether data should be serialize
On 2003.02.24 14:25 Bill Burke wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> David
> > Jencks
> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 1:54 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Su
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
> Jencks
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 1:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] org.jboss.aop.MethodMetaData
>
>
> On 200
On 2003.02.24 13:17 Bill Burke wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> David
> > Jencks
> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:37 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Su
encks
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] org.jboss.aop.MethodMetaData
>
>
>
>
> > I also want to add that the current interface for Metadata, metadata
> > chains,
> > and how you configure metadata is
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sacha
> Labourey
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] org.jboss.aop.MethodMetaData
>
>
> > When an
> > I
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
> Jencks
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] org.jboss.aop.MethodMetaData
>
>
>
>
> > I also wan
> I also want to add that the current interface for Metadata, metadata
> chains,
> and how you configure metadata is open for debate. It probably is not a
> complete definition and I'm open for suggestions. I'm hoping that as I
> port
> some of the current interceptors more requirements will b
> When an
> Interceptor wants metadata, it walks the chain. Each
> repository decides
> whether or not it can resolve the metadata, or how to resolve
> the metadata
> reference based on the context of the Invocation. For example, for
> MethodMetaData, the context of the Invocation is the method
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill
> Burke
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:06 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] org.jboss.aop.MethodMetaData
>
>
>
>
> > -Original
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
> Jencks
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 9:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] org.jboss.aop.MethodMetaData
>
>
> On 200
On 2003.02.24 09:14 Bill Burke wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> David
> > Jencks
> > Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 1:43 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
> Jencks
> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 1:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] org.jboss.aop.MethodMetaData
>
>
>public Object resolve(Invoc
public Object resolve(Invocation invocation, String group, String attr)
{
Method method = MethodInvocation.getMethod(invocation);
return getMethodMetaData(method.getName(), group, attr);
}
Am I missing something or is this code making the assumption that a
method's name provid
14 matches
Mail list logo
