where.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "julien viet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:45 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
Scott M Stark wrote:
We really have not looked into tweaking the jsp compiler layer to
see if
the filesystem requirement can be rep
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 04:39 AM, julien viet wrote:
I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
not adapted to nukes at all. I think the nicest feature of
JSP is the possibility to embed true java code whithin text :
<% for (int i = 0;i < 5;i++) { %>
<%= i %>
<% } %>
I lo
SMS> From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SMS> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SMS> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:13 AM
SMS> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
>> Scott M Stark wrote:
>> > We really have not looked into tweaking the jsp compiler
ay, April 01, 2003 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
> Scott M Stark wrote:
> > We really have not looked into tweaking the jsp compiler layer to see if
> > the filesystem requirement can be replaced by an input stream or byte[]
> > view of classes as far
Scott M Stark wrote:
We really have not looked into tweaking the jsp compiler layer to see if
the filesystem requirement can be replaced by an input stream or byte[]
view of classes as far as I know. Its something to look into as another
optimization/benefit of embedding the web container into JBos
.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "julien viet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:37 AM
Subject: Re[11]: [JBoss-dev]
julien viet wrote:
I can bend jasper compiler to compile JSP to java classes, I've
already done that.
JSP compilation is now functional again in Tomcat 4.1.x. I recommend you
deploy your production webapps (Nukes, etc) with that and explicit
mappings for the JSPs in web.xml.
You can see all the
>> I can bend jasper compiler to compile JSP to java classes,
>> I've already done that.
mf> there you go then,
>> However compiling classes is a CLASSPATH nightmare. That's
>> why I would like an in memory compiler. Not anymore.
mf> Stop being such a "choupette", it is anoying. Where is the
language.
BB> Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
julien viet
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:36 AM
To: Pavel Kolesnikov
Subject: Re[7]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
for me no. I don't like jsp tags.
PK> On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, julien viet wro
is as your fave part cause most folks that do tons
of
JSP think this is one of the more evil parts of JSP...
From: julien viet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:39:33 +0200
To: marc fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re[6]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is com
> I can bend jasper compiler to compile JSP to java classes,
> I've already done that.
there you go then,
> However compiling classes is a CLASSPATH nightmare. That's
> why I would like an in memory compiler. Not anymore.
Stop being such a "choupette", it is anoying. Where is the can-do
atti
uesday, April 01, 2003 7:36 AM
>> To: Pavel Kolesnikov
>> Subject: Re[7]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
>>
>>
>> for me no. I don't like jsp tags.
>>
>> PK> On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, julien viet wrote:
>>
>> >> I dont't want to reinvent a s
TED]>
> Subject: Re[6]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
>
> I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
> not adapted to nukes at all. I think the nicest feature of
> JSP is the possibility to embed true java code whithin text :
>
>
> <% for (int i = 0;i &l
April 01, 2003 7:36 AM
> To: Pavel Kolesnikov
> Subject: Re[7]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
>
>
> for me no. I don't like jsp tags.
>
> PK> On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, julien viet wrote:
>
> >> I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
> >
for me no. I don't like jsp tags.
PK> On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, julien viet wrote:
>> I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
>> not adapted to nukes at all. I think the nicest feature of
>> JSP is the possibility to embed true java code whithin text :
>>
>>
>> <% for (int i = 0;i
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, julien viet wrote:
> I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
> not adapted to nukes at all. I think the nicest feature of
> JSP is the possibility to embed true java code whithin text :
>
>
> <% for (int i = 0;i < 5;i++) { %>
> <%= i %>
> <% } %>
>
>
Ok
OTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I'd really prefer JSP integration or integration with some
other popular Java based web scripting.
mf> JSP is clearly the way to go. We will fail if we r
;> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 10:52 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
>>
>>
>> I'd really prefer JSP integration or integration with some
>> other popular Java based web scripting.
mf> JSP is clearly the
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 2:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
>
>
>
>
> > -Original
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bill Burke
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 10:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
>
>
> I'd really prefer JSP i
MAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
>
> I'd really prefer JSP integration or integration with some other popular
> Java based web scripting.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt; >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> >> Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
> >> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 2:06 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
> >>
> >>
> >> I talked with 2 compiler projects
compiler for
mf> NUKES? JSP like writing for advanced programmatic modules?
mf> marcf
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
>> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 2:06 PM
>> To: [E
ay, March 30, 2003 2:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
>
>
> I talked with 2 compiler projects after JBoss boot camp and both were
> interested in being integrated, but I dropped the ball and
> got busy on
> some other stuff.
I talked with 2 compiler projects after JBoss boot camp and both were
interested in being integrated, but I dropped the ball and got busy on
some other stuff. If anyone is interested in this I can send you the
contact info.
-dain
On Sunday, March 30, 2003, at 10:37 AM, julien viet wrote:
Hel
> cool, it could help for module or block scripting in Nukes,
> i.e get code class - fully generate class - compile it -
> generate xmbeam - deploy it
>
> pluggable resource loader is very helpfull, I don't know if
> we can have bytes of class through unified classloaders but
> that would help
Hello Marcel,
Sunday, March 30, 2003, 6:23:38 PM, you wrote:
MA> julien viet wrote ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>> JD> Though now that I think about it I would prefer that Java was more like
>> JD> PHP in the sense of a light weight web application development language
>> JD> with its rich extensions an
julien viet wrote ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> JD> Though now that I think about it I would prefer that Java was more like
> JD> PHP in the sense of a light weight web application development language
> JD> with its rich extensions and apis.
>
> we discussed with Dain at boot camp and we wished
> havin
JD> It is certainly possible, though it does not look like the new features
JD> will inhibit PHP folks from coding they way they do now. It just looks
JD> like it will allow them to write better software. I spent the past 2
JD> weeks writing a PHP application and over and over I wished for feat
It is certainly possible, though it does not look like the new features
will inhibit PHP folks from coding they way they do now. It just looks
like it will allow them to write better software. I spent the past 2
weeks writing a PHP application and over and over I wished for features
like name
not sure they will keep php community whith them. for me
php success is settled on the fact php scripters don't have to worry
about theses kinds of things.
JD> Looks like Java Meets PHP with some .NET flavoring. I like it.
JD> --jason
JD> On Saturday, March 29, 2003, at 04:56 PM, julien viet
Looks like Java Meets PHP with some .NET flavoring. I like it.
--jason
On Saturday, March 29, 2003, at 04:56 PM, julien viet wrote:
sorry I gave a wrong link :
http://talks.php.net/show/php5intro
jv> have a look at the new php 5 : http://talks.php.net
jv> they added : exceptions, modifier
sorry I gave a wrong link :
http://talks.php.net/show/php5intro
jv> have a look at the new php 5 : http://talks.php.net
jv> they added : exceptions, modifiers, interfaces, abstract, namespaces and more.
jv> it's mono powered.
jv> it seems that now they want to reach enterprise level and h
have a look at the new php 5 : http://talks.php.net
they added : exceptions, modifiers, interfaces, abstract, namespaces and more.
it's mono powered.
it seems that now they want to reach enterprise level and have
to get more credibility for that.
julien
-
35 matches
Mail list logo
