I made significant porgress tonight with the JMX Connector. I now have full
functionality for method invocation and attribute manipulation. I support the
following data types: String, int, double, float, long, char, boolean, and Date(and
their Object counterparts). I do simple date validatio
I actually started JMXView(which I have been informed I might have to rename), after
reading Howard's comments on Tapestry. At the time, I was beginning to evaluate
Tapestry, and was immediately enamoured with it. After doing some initial ports of
one of our internal apps, i thought it would
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, David Jencks wrote:
> Look into the modelmbean descriptors. I think they include a "priority" as
> a standard descriptor, this could be used to determine whether to display
> something.
"visibility" to determine the granularity of mbeans (spec defines levels
1-4)
"presentat
My two cents worth ...
I'm very excited at the prospect of a Tapestry application being directly integrated
into JBoss (I'm the author of Tapestry). I'm not sure if Jim came up with this idea
seperately from me, but I had the idea of a JMX adaptor for JBoss a while back.
I favor the idea of u
> In the project I am currently involved the project manager
> is really looking for a tool which provides monitoring
> functions like the JSR-77 specs provide. He always looks
> for something like the BEA console.
>
> Is that something you had in mind or just more a
> replacement for the SUN HTM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jim Birchfield;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: RE: AW: [JBoss-dev] JMX HTML... From the Pure Fluff
Department...
Please let me know when you have finished your cleaning and have published
the
sources. I am going to be busy for the next week (perhaps, unless I under
estimate my
639-3136 (c)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 4:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; James Birchfield
> Subject: Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] JMX HTML... From the Pure Fluff Department...
>
> Very nic
] JMX HTML... From the Pure Fluff Department...
Very nice, just looked at the shoot, will look into more later.
Are you expecting to maintain this yourself? Just currious if you had
though
of making this a part og JBoss, thus opening up the maintenece to a wider
audience?
Either way, looks great
Very nice, just looked at the shoot, will look into more later.
Are you expecting to maintain this yourself? Just currious if you had though
of making this a part og JBoss, thus opening up the maintenece to a wider
audience?
Either way, looks great. I have been meaning to do something like
Hello James!
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 06:49:11PM +0200, Marcus Redeker wrote:
> James,
>
> your screenshots look almos like the SUN stuff ;-) Is there already a
> CVS module or some files to download and take 'live' look at it?
I want to help with this project, too.
CU
Thomas
--
==
t: Sonntag, 7. April 2002 16:48
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] JMX HTML... From the Pure Fluff
Department...
Project is http://jmxview.sf.net";>here
_
View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?for
Project is http://jmxview.sf.net";>here
_
View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=11622
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.n
I am well on my way with this. I have almost full functionality of the SUN HTML RI,
and plan to be finished with that soon. I have registered for a project space on
SourceForge, and will hopefully be pushing things out over the next week. It includes
security, enhanced views, and easier navi
Hi and happy Easter,
so following the ongoing discussions it looks to me
that we are looking for something that replaces the
Sun JMX Adaptor. It should be a webapp with a nice
outfit and similar functionality the current JMX
adaptor provides.
Since I am more a technical person myself but I would
- Original Message -
From: "Marcus Redeker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JBoss Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:45 PM
Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] JMX HTML... From the Pure Fluff Department...
> I also like the idea of a small integrated version and
I also like the idea of a small integrated version and an extended
full feature tool. Do you guys think that the JSR77 stuff is already
implemented enough to include statistics and monitoring in this
new JMX management tool?
I just put a patch out to register the SUN Adaptor with basic authentica
16 matches
Mail list logo
