ivelin wrote:
The JBoss IDE team will begin implementing EJB3 support in an upcoming version. Let's discuss the roadmap.
Ivelin, great news. I have already checked out Bill's and Gavin's
xpetstore EJB3 port and implemented some examples based on DR4 und RC1.
For this early stage of development
I am I blind? I see 3.2 beta and 3.0.4 but no 3.0.5?
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 06:40, Scott M Stark wrote:
The 3.0.5 release of JBoss is available from SourceForge here:
https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866
Detailed change notes are available here:
it's there, i just dl'd it.
it's far down on the page; somethings not quite right with sourceforge.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 9:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] [JBoss-user] JBoss-3.0.5 release
On 2002.02.23 04:10:09 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote:
Any reason (once .net compiles) not to make these standard modules
instead of optional?
--jason
Are these modules compiled with all? If so could you make the description
read something like Compiles all modules, including optional and
No, these are only compiled with you specify the -Dgroups=all.
Currently the groups and modules properties are the only way to control
which module gets executed.
I initially setup the split based on different assumptions based on what
I thought our usage would be. Basically though I think
Yes, we will always have raw contrib stuff and experiments. It simply
should not affect the base compile or tests. If something isn't being
supported though we ditch it.
May be a good idea to have an experimental group though. For example,
the jmx stuff might go there until it has been
Apache is
chiefly funded (at least the java part) by SUN and IBM, the truth is that
the developers are all employees.
This isn't true.
Most Apache developers are independent consultants, working in their free
time, or working for other companies then Sun and IBM, even if we are
talking about
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kasper Nielsen
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss and JBoss Group, responding to flames
Apache is
chiefly
I seem to agree with Jay. The web server in Tomcat sucks. It is very slow!
Vinay
- Original Message -
From: Jay Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Schaefer, Andreas ' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 1:34 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss on JBoss
I fail
: [JBoss-dev] JBoss on JBoss
|
|
|I seem to agree with Jay. The web server in Tomcat sucks. It is very slow!
|
|Vinay
|- Original Message -
|From: Jay Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|To: 'Schaefer, Andreas ' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 1:34 AM
|Subject: RE
(JBoss 3.0) philosophical stuff.
Thanks for telling us why.
Don't worry about Tomcat, we can always go with Jetty!
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 9:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss on JBoss
by that.
Vinay
- Original Message -
From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 2:02 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss on JBoss
and you gonna run it for me? unless you put your work on the line, don't
put
your mouth and opinions in front
I
: Friday, June 15, 2001 9:45 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss on JBoss
Really, I was just asking the question. You're doing it
differently than I
would and I want to understand why.
Sounds like two things
(1) Hey why use apache is tomcat can serve static content
Why the decision to remove apache and serve everything from tomcat?
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 11:50 AM
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net; Jboss-User@Lists.
Sourceforge. Net
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss
-Original Message-
From: Jay Walters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:05 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss on JBoss
Why the decision to remove apache and serve everything from tomcat?
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 6/14/01 1:34 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss on JBoss
What a question !
How do you want to convince other people to use JBoss when
you aren't going to use your own tool. Either JBoss is
ready to be used in production and then we should use it.
BTW We are going to create
16 matches
Mail list logo
