logy Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juha
Lindfors
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jmx unit tests
the jmx module unit tests are the
tark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juha
Lindfors
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] jmx unit tests
JBOSS-HEAD:
/cygdri
wrote:
>
> > What are the other 3 known compliance issues? 3.2 and head should be in
> > synch
> > on class loaders and I need to merge some of the changes made to the jmx
> > layer so I want to get these test working before doing the merge.
> >
> >
> &g
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juha
> Lindfors
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 10:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jmx unit tests
>
>
> the jmx module unit tests are the ones we run against, the ones in
> testsuite
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juha
> Lindfors
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 10:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jmx unit tests
>
>
> the jmx module unit tests are the ones we run against, the ones in
> testsuite were never maintained.
>
> A
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juha
Lindfors
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jmx unit tests
the jmx module unit tests are the ones we run against, the ones
the jmx module unit tests are the ones we run against, the ones in
testsuite were never maintained.
At least 3 of the 4 failures on compliance are known issues (and reported
as such), I don't know about the JMX 1.2 notification emitter one.
The two errors are both related to classloading, at lea