No, its not an easy fix :( I think the patch Vladimir posted should work (will
need updating as its for old versions of Seam) but its a bit of a hack :(
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=480#480
Reply to the post :
Anyone have a workaround for this?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4111049#4111049
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4111049
___
jboss-user mailing list
That's not really a jboss seam issue, it is a JPA (Java Persistence API) issue.
As long as your integration test works, so should it when you run with JBoss
Seam.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4091248#4091248
Reply to the post :
Because nobody answered, I post the answer myself. Yes, it is a known bug:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-666
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4085513#4085513
Reply to the post :
So, I upgraded to Seam 2 (latest nightly build), and the s:decorate problem is
indeed gone. However, I still have problems with s:link.
If I include the following in a page, it works without any problems:
| s:link action=#{homeAction.test} value=Test with s:link/s:link
|
Known issue with 1.2.1, fixed in Seam2
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4082912#4082912
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4082912
___
jboss-user mailing
OK, thanks for the prompt response. Seems like I should upgrade to Seam 2...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4082930#4082930
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4082930
For convenience, I will provide additional info:
JBoss AS 4.0.5
SEAM 1.2
JSF 1.1
I dont have any beans yet, so the beans jar is only present by name, it doesn't
have anything to load.
pageflow.jpdl.xml
pageflow-definition
| xmlns=http://jboss.com/products/seam/pageflow;
|
No, go ahead and jump in. I will be working on landing the actual updates to
the GWTJSF integration kit in Ajax4JSF's SVN repository in the next week or
two, now that GWT 1.4RC1 is out. I'll also work on some additional
documentation of what the library is and how it functions.
Then I will
Thanks for such a thorough writeup and example on this Rob.
I'm exploring using this now that gwt 1.4RC is out, using the latest seam from
cvs. Any updates or other things those of us exploring using your approach
should be aware of before I jump in?
Thanks :-)
View the original post :
OK, well how about this?
http://unrealities.com/gwtjsf/20070501/
Note the article link:
http://unrealities.com/gwtjsf/20070501/article_0.2.html
I have iterated on the article content once with Michael Yuan. All additional
feedback is more than welcome! Also, the demo itself is a lot nicer
Fudge, sorry for the non-clickable URLs. Darn quick post box.
http://unrealities.com/gwtjsf/20070501
http://unrealities.com/gwtjsf/20070501/article_0.2.html
There you go.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4042027#4042027
Reply to the post :
Pretty cool!
I think it needs some explanation about *what* makes it different from a
Seam+JSF app, and how you've gone about adding GWT widgets in. Perhaps also an
intro to how gwt4jsf works would be good (I'm coming at this knowing Seam,
knowing a bit of a4j, and nothing about GWT/gwt4jsf).
Yer, absolutely. Right now it is definitely not a very compelling use of GWT
in a Seam context.
Gavin told me last month that he was a complete [expletive deleted] when it
comes to documentation and support :-) So, yes, I will definitely make sure
that the feature set, the build process
Rob,
This sounds really cool. Would you mind if I mention it (or even run a short
demo) in my JavaOne talk?
cheers
Michael
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4041526#4041526
Reply to the post :
Um, well, actually, no, Michael, I wouldn't mind at all :-D I will send you an
email momentarily.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4041556#4041556
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4041556
Hm, it would seem your email is not easily discernable. Drop me a line at
rjellinghaus at gmail dot com and we'll discuss details? Thanks!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4041563#4041563
Reply to the post :
Quick question for Pete and Michael: Any tips on docbook authoring? It looks
like doing some quick docbook documentation might be the fastest way to both
enhance this example for Seam, and to explain to Michael how it works so he can
present it at JavaOne :-)
What's the fastest way to spin
I think this could potentially become a Seam GWT integration chapter in the
Seam reference doc. However, before we start to mess with the Seam official
docs (and have Gavin yell at us), perhaps you can write it up like an article?
You can discuss why it is a challenge to integrate JSF/Seam with
Plus, we can also try to publish the article on other Java sites or jboss.org
-- they will all be very interested in this subject. :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4041601#4041601
Reply to the post :
Roger that. Michael Neale of Redhat already contributed some remoting-style
GWT integration to the head of CVS, but I don't know if he documented it. I'll
check. I guess I'll find a decent HTML editor and write it that way, can't go
wrong with that
I wasn't planning to mess with the
HI i got the same problem. Did you have any solutions ?
Tom
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3994725#3994725
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3994725
___
Probably just a bad message from JSF.
Do you have the method on your local interface?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3994737#3994737
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3994737
I use (3) but it is a personal choice :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3991570#3991570
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3991570
___
jboss-user mailing
anonymous wrote : Is Jboss pushing JSF and if so are they making it easier for
developer to work with this framework over the others??
Yes, we thing JSF is good, but we are improving usability and adding some
missing features by developing Seam.
anonymous wrote : Have they any feature in there
Sigh ^^
Well, ok that means u have
-model
-view
package in every module, did i understood you right?
I have to decide between 2 and 3, if u say solution 3) works good for you , ill
adopt it.
Thank you very much,
Holger
View the original post :
You'll run into problems if you try to put the action methods on entities (e.g.
Seam annotations have no effect).
Oh i see, so i really have to split actions and model(entity) bean (like it is
now)
shouldnt this difference be reflected in your package structure or would u put
all into the
Do you actually need anything from the h:form that h:commandButton would
require? If not, why not try Seam's s:button?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3989349#3989349
Reply to the post :
Thanks for replying..
Well this is my JSF page:
| !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
| ui:composition xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
| xmlns:ui=http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets;
|
Try using a Seam page parameter.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3989477#3989477
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3989477
___
jboss-user mailing list
Thx for replying but could you be more specific and give me a simplified
example?
The parameter as I already mentioned in not constant.
Regards,
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3989583#3989583
Reply to the post :
http://docs.jboss.com/seam/1.1BETA2/reference/en/html/events.html#d0e3178
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3989585#3989585
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3989585
Note : I am testing with a static pdf from filesystem to debug, will use pdf
later.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3987817#3987817
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3987817
You need to call facesContext.responseComplete() after os.flush() otherwise the
JSF lifecycle will continue as normal.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3987836#3987836
Reply to the post :
Thanks !!! Solved the problem. Completely overlooked it ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3987845#3987845
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3987845
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : anonymous wrote : I'm currently using Seam 1.1
|
| Are you sure? You are using a build from CVS? Seam 1.1 was not yet
officially released.
|
sorry, i have 1.0.1:P
But I still can't resolve my problem. I think best idea is to use Synchronizer
Token Pattern, on
Like I said, this stuff is solved in 1.1.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3980329#3980329
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3980329
___
jboss-user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Like I said, this stuff is solved in 1.1.
Maybe it's time to change Seam 1.0.1 - 1.1:P
beacuse this problem is very painful for me...could you give here link to the
documentation (whats new in 1.1v) those Seam beta version ,and link where can I
download?
Regards!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : I serialize concurrent requests in the same
conversation scope. Seam 1.1 is designed to support a high level of concurrency
in a session, like you get with AJAX clients.
I'm currently using Seam 1.1. Could U show me an example code, how to protect
application from
anonymous wrote : I'm currently using Seam 1.1
Are you sure? You are using a build from CVS? Seam 1.1 was not yet officially
released.
1.1 != 1.0.1
anonymous wrote : Could U show me an example code, how to protect application
from users double-click?
No, because you havn't shown any of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Use Seam 1.1 (currently available only in CVS).
How do you protect against double clicks in Seam 1.1? We are experiencing this
in our testing and this would be enough of a reason to move to using Seam 1.1.
Forgive me if this is in the documenation. I have not keep up
I serialize concurrent requests in the same conversation scope. Seam 1.1 is
designed to support a high level of concurrency in a session, like you get with
AJAX clients.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3979699#3979699
Reply to the post :
Use Seam 1.1 (currently available only in CVS).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3979399#3979399
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3979399
___
jboss-user
43 matches
Mail list logo
