Hi,
I've come from a Sybase EA Server background where I was able to code a
custom module to authenticate the user connection. I'd like to be able to do
the same with JBoss which I'm piloting at present. The authentication
involves calling an EJB from the custom module. We're using Tomcat
Maybe this article will help with some confusion:
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-08-2001/jw-0831-jaas.html
If your running Tomcat outside of JBoss then you have to write your
own request interceptor to pass the web container authentication information
to the EJB request layer. In this
I am running a proccess and when i have few data it runs well, i mean it performs the
commit and i can see the result in the DB, but when there are many data and the
proccesses takes about 15 minutes, the proccess ends well but i does not perform the
commit...
I say the proccess end well,
I'm trying to write an Session EJB to administrate users in a Database.
I've written it and connect to mySql in this way :
CODE --
public int dbConnect() {
try {
Class.forName(org.gjt.mm.mysql.Driver).newInstance();
Has anyone tried integrating non-web applications with the JBoss security
framework? I believe principals can be propagated from Web Containers to the
JBoss easily but what about from Swing based applications etc?
Any thoughts?
- Original Message -
From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Lennart,
I must apologise for this mail reaching this list! The mail was
basically forwarded to me by a collegue of mine and I was responding to him
that we were not planning to do an upgrade to JBoss 2.4.2 immediately. I
guess I did a reply within the forwarded mail instead of the
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vinay Menon
|Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:49 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] getCallerPrincipal problems
|
|
|Has anyone tried integrating non-web applications with the JBoss
Hi,
The default transaction timeout in JBoss is 300 seconds,
so you probably see a message about a transaction timeout
in your server log.
Even after a tx timeout, your code may continue to run,
but you can never commit the transaction - only roll it
back.
Try raising the default transaction
Hi,
(sorry for this rePost but I think someone should be able to answer this).
For a new project, I need to decide whether its suitable to use session
beans or a servlet/jsp approach is enough.
The java application talks to a legacy C++ application and all the
communication is XML over
i am using the JBoss 2.4.1 bundle with Jetty 3.1.RC9-1 on Win 2k and JDK 1.3.
i have an entry in web.xml in a .war as such:
web-app
env-entry
descriptionThis is an environment entry./description
env-entry-nameEnvName/env-entry-name
env-entry-valueThisIsaValue/env-entry-value
Title: Catalina vs. Jetty vs. Resin
Has anyone done some benchmarking with tomcat 4.0 (catalina) vs. Jetty vs. Resin
thanks
Patrick
Should be very similiar for both approach.
The development time for EJB may be a bit longer due to the difficult to
do testing.
If you did a good design the maintainability should be almost the same.
The design for tomcat/handcoded has a tendency to
be messy while most people follow J2EE blue
I've a webapp running ok, but every time that a made a rebuild of it a got
the following error if I don't restart tomcat server.
Anybody can help ??
Error: 500
Location: /usermanager/index.html
Internal Servlet Error:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Can't happen - classname is null, who
Hello,
I have a problem when using javax.transaction.UserTransacion in a
client-app.
Im working with JBoss 2.4.1.
At first the code:
//*
Object obj = jndiContext.lookup(ejb/eb/UserBean);
UserHome userHome = (UserHome )
This is a long-standing tomcat problem that is mentioned from time to
time on the tomcat list. The problem arises because recompile gens a new
class serial id which confuses tomcat. The last I heard, the tomcat
folks dismiss it as a classloader problem and suggest that you do what
you did:
I may be wrong, but I get the sense that UserBean is a CMP Entity Bean.
If so, then the problem is that programmatic transaction demarcation
only applies to a BMT (Bean Managed Transaction) Session Bean.
Fred Loney
Spirited Software, Inc.
www.spiritedsw.com
- Original Message -
From:
I have a couple of Web applications that contain JMS clients communicating
to a JBoss server. The Jboss libraries are packaged in the appropriate WAR
file and then unzipped into the webapps/application/WEB-INF/lib directory.
When the servlet/jsp page tries to make a JMS call I always get a
Anyone know of a solid, preferably open source, j2ee framework. It needs to
include EJB/JSP/Servlet in the framework.
James
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
I'm trying to install Tomcat 4.0 with Jboss (2.4).
I was looking at jboos.org but I couldn't found in the file server.xml the
sections described in the how-to.
Any one is running with this configuration and can send me the server.xml
for Tomcat 4.0 and Jboss ??
Regards
Papo
not me... and I don't think you will find many of these around here...
sorry
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hicks, James
|Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:25 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-user] Solid J2EE
Found one for a lot of $$...realmethods.com
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:04 PM
To: Hicks, James; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Solid J2EE Framework
not me... and I don't think you will find many of
Hello,
Has anyone tried out the new JBoss 2.4.2 / Catalina 4.0 download? It
seems to start up without a hitch but none of the sample servlets/jsps work
when Catalina is started with JBoss. However, if I start Catalina in
standalone more all the examples work. Seems to suggest something is
Hi, I am using JMS as an Resource with JBoss version 2.4.1.
And I am getting an exception:
Any Ideas?
thanks
david
Exception===
[Default] FINE: created connection: org.jboss.mq.SpyXAConnection@273d30
[Default] FINE: xaQueueSession: org.jboss.mq.SpyQueueSession@108727
I am having reports of another JNDI related problem with this release.
Would it be possible for you to drop back to the 2.4.0/3.1.RC8 release and let
me know if that works, or shows the same problem ?
Thanks,
Jules
Edward Q. Bridges wrote:
i am using the JBoss 2.4.1 bundle with Jetty
Figured out what's wrong.
Some how the persistent directory is messed up.
after delete the DAT0 files under jbossmq directory and restarted the
server.
It work just fine.
thanks
david
-Original Message-
From: David You
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:21 PM
To: JBoss User List
There is still something wrong with it.
Everytime after I shutdown the server, I have to manually delete the
DAT0 files.
Otherwise it just went crazy after it restarted.
regards
david
-Original Message-
From: David You
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:21 PM
To: JBoss User List
Some advantages of session beans:
1.) Access via RMI. No need for a web server. You can use a Java
thin-client approach. The client is mainly user-interface code. The
session beans contain
some business logic and make use of data access objects that interface to
your legacy application.
27 matches
Mail list logo
