Hi,
From: Ionel Gardais [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm using Xdoclet to generate the interfaces of my beans and the
deployment descriptor.
I have enable a 1:N relationship.
Even when I am not adding an @jboss.relation tag, I get a
relationship
But you have an @ejb.relation tag in
Hi,
From: Ionel Gardais [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm no more enable to access localhost:8082 for the
management or even
The management is now under localhost:8080/jmx-console/
apps deployed under localhost:8080
Do you see deployment errors in the logfile? The jmx-console on
Rupp,Heiko wrote:
But you have an @ejb.relation tag in there?
I do.
Here is the shrunk of code, in the LessonBean :
/**
* @ejb.interface-method
* view-type=local
* @ejb.relation
* name=Lesson-Room
* role-name=Lesson-teachedin-Room
* target-ejb=ejbRoom
*
Hello,
I've been working with 3.0.6 and yesterday I decided to change to 3.2rc2.
But
one of my bean relationship stopped working, I have another m:n relationship
and it works, the only diference is that in the first one of the fields is a
string(varchar in sql) and the other is an
Hi,
My staff is studing the porting of an online trading proprietary application
with J2EE technology and JBoss. This application handles about 60.000 Tx per
day. We need a cluster for fail over and load balancing scaling capabilities.
We made some test on a sigle JBoss instance using commit
I'm still trying to figure out how to do autologin into JBoss
declarative security using a persistent cookie :-)
Would anyone happen to know where the source code for the decision
of whether or not a user is logged in is? I'm looking for the
code point just before it puts up the
Hi,
I think it must be my fault. If I have an entry X on the table A, an entry Y
on table B and a entry Z (Z= fk_X, fk_Y) on table AB and then I start my
test:
1-finds the entry X and then executes getBs everything works fine
2-finds the entry Y and executes getAs everything works fine.
Do you mean entity Z is mapped to table AB that is a relation table that
handles many-to-many for A and B? Current implementation was desinged
so that relation table is used only for relationship handling, not to
represent thrid entity. I never tested this case.
From what method and at what time
How do I lookup an object in an EJB local JNDI namespace from the
outside, e.g. from an MBean?
I assume it is possible, as the jboss:service=JNDIView MBean is capable
of listing all objects both in the global as well as in each local
namespaces.
--
Eric Jain
Lennart Petersson wrote:
Clustering means better availability, not necessarily better performance.
I though JBoss implemented Cluster for performance and scalability :-)
Anyway I don't want to be polemic, I was just wondering about a good solution to
obtain availabilty and increase performance.
Yes I mean this, but Z is not an entity bean just an entry in the table.
- Original Message -
From: Alex Loubyansky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jordi Valldaura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:56 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-user] RC2 possible bug in m:n relationships
Do you
Hi all,
Has someone made a 'struts.sar' file, or equivalent, that will have all the normal
struts and validator libraries to support webapps? If not, would this be the right
approach? If get confirmation that this is the right approach and no one has done one
yet, I'll see if I can hack
you should expect a clustered solution to have slightly more latency than
an equivalently configured (with same commit option) non clustered
solution: there is more communication. However by adding more servers you
should be able to get higher throughput as well (again, with the same
commit
I need to attach descriptions to attributes and operations of some
simple, unchanging MBeans. Is there any way to accomplish this (perhaps
through jboss-service.xml), without having to resort to manually
creating MBeanInfos?
--
Eric Jain
---
It depends on what web container you're using:
Tomcat 4.0/Catalina:
catalina/src/main/org/jboss/web/catalina/security/JBossSecurityMgrRealm.java
Tomcat 4.1:
tomcat41/src/main/org/jboss/web/catalina/security/JBossSecurityMgrRealm.java
Jetty:
1.0.2b
Scott StarkChief Technology
OfficerJBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From:
Simone Milani
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 7:02
AM
Subject: [JBoss-user] JMNS version in
3.2.0
Hi David, thank you for your reply, I remember your precious help on the
Connector mailing list.
David Jencks wrote:
you should expect a clustered solution to have slightly more latency than
an equivalently configured (with same commit option) non clustered
solution: there is more communication.
Security is basically unchanged but 3.0.0 is so far back in time who
knows. Check the current security testsuite setup to compare for
changes or submit a bug report with an example of the problem.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Its the web container that makes this determination and integration is
specific to the web container. A valve in tomcat and an interceptor in jetty.
The web container calls out to its security manager plugin which is where
the JBoss security is integrated. See:
Hi,
Here is the problem I am experiencing.. I
have 3 related entities - A, B and C. There is a many-to-many relationship
between A and B and a many-to-one between B and C. I am usingCMR to manage these relationships. I am
trying to set object B on object A. Before that, I set object C on
Hi,
Here is the problem I am experiencing..
I have 3 related entities - A, B and C. There is a many-to-many relationship
between A and B and a many-to-one between B and C. I am using CMR to manage
these relationships.
I am trying to set object B on object A. Before that, I set object C on
correction 6tx/4hours ~ 4tx/sec. even better. :)
Davide wrote:
Hi David, thank you for your reply, I remember your precious help on the
Connector mailing list.
David Jencks wrote:
you should expect a clustered solution to have slightly more latency than
an equivalently configured (with
6 tx/day. suppose a trading session has 4 hours. this means ~ 7
tx/sec. In a serial trading engine (even written in java) this seems
more than achivable. so make a clear cut between trading domains (u
serially trade 1000 symbols on one engine, another 1000 in other engine,
etc) talk to
Use xmbeans. You can mark up your source with xdoclet tags and generate
the xmbean xml descriptor using xdoclet.
You can also generate docbook xml with approximately the same info content
and use this to generate an html or pdf manual describing the mbeans.
(another xdoclet task. This is set up
Found JBossSecurityMgrRealm in the contrib module:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jboss/contrib/tomcat41/src/main/org/jboss/web/catalina/security/
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
Ok, you say this is described in the for-pay docs. My subscription ran out so
I re-upped for another year for all docs. Mind pointing me in the right
direction? I heard someone say there was a whole chapter on this.
The 2.4.6 book doesn't seem to have anything on read-only. The 3.0.5 CMP
its in the admin book. There's a chapter on entity bean locking that I
wrote.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon Swinth
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] Re: Deadlocks
Ok, you say
Start with the Read-Only Beans section on page 208
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Jon Swinth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 2:27 PM
Subject:
Yes, just change the multicast address in the UDP protocol to something
different.
Cheers,
sacha
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Vladyslav Kosulin
Sent: lundi, 3. mars 2003 18:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] Two
Hello All,
I am looking for some help using XA/Cloudscape. Everything works fine with
default user APP. How can I specify the username? I want to connect as user
test and not the default APP.
Please help.
rgds
MS
---
This SF.net email is
Hello ,
We are using Jboss 2.4.3, Tomcat 3.2.3, jdk 1.3, postgres 7.2.1
running on Red Hat Linux 7.2
The Jboss server stops responding occassionally(1 to 2 times in a week). The
jboss fails to get a connection object giving following errors.
Transaction XidImpl [FormatId=257,
I get the following error whenever I deploy an .ear file, but if I just
stop and start JBoss the file is picked up and deploys fine.
If I then touch the file, I get the error again. What gives?
The best I can find with google is that it may have something to do
with the DTD going missing, or
Chapter 5?
From: Jon Swinth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 14:27:55 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] Re: Deadlocks
I see the reference for read-only in the DTD, but I was advised that the docs
had info on this. I don't mind paying
33 matches
Mail list logo
