Thanks Red, I got that part working now.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3854040#3854040
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3854040
---
Thi
No, do not specify the @ejb.bean primkey-field tag/attribute for beans with composite
keys.
Only specify the @ejb.pk-field tag on the getters/setters of the fields corresponding
to your
composite key. Do not use it in your 'getPK()' method.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.
Thanks, I'm stiill reading up on one article:
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-santa1/
Anyway, yes, i did put @ejb.pk-field method level tags on getters. But do we need
@ejb.bean primkey-field still? I guess we do - but we specify "field name" - NOT
"column name".
so... here's w
I found that one cannot specify the 'primkey-field' attribute on the @ejb.bean tag if
you have
a composite key for the bean. You must specify @ejb.pk-field tags on all of the
getter/setter
methods that define your composite key.
Then, if you specify the subtask in the task in your
build fil
So, I've implemented a primary key class "GroupMembershipKey" -- I still need to know
what I should specify for @ejb.bean primkey-field attribute.
My understanding is that @ejb.bean primkey-field is not mandatory. Will it suffice if
I just specify @ejb.pk-field on primary key getters? Example:
Think I found part of the answer (Still need to know what XDoclet tags I need to
specify) - Quoting J2EE Tutorial from Sun:
Chapter: "Primary Keys for Container-Managed Persistence"
If the primary key class does not belong to the J2SE or J2EE standard libraries, then
you must implement the clas
