Re: [JBoss-user] Fleurys basic problem!

2002-04-16 Thread danch
JD Brennan wrote: > >From: David Hamilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >From JavaWorld > >http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-04-2002/jw-0412-opensource.html > > >... in violation of a specification license. ... > > Any idea what that means? Does that refer to reference > code impleme

Re: [JBoss-user] Fleurys basic problem!

2002-04-16 Thread Dain Sundstrom
This is just a comment from some unnamed executive, and as we all know executives don't know much in a company the size of Sun. Do you know how many executives Sun has?. I am sure that if you ask another unnamed executive, you would get another opinion. Also the specification gives specifical

RE: [JBoss-user] Fleurys basic problem!

2002-04-16 Thread JD Brennan
Title: RE: [JBoss-user] Fleurys basic problem! >From: David Hamilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >From JavaWorld >http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-04-2002/jw-0412-opensource.html >... in violation of a specification license. ... Any idea what that means?  Does t

[JBoss-user] Fleurys basic problem!

2002-04-16 Thread David Hamilton
>From JavaWorld http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-04-2002/jw-0412-opensource.html The most vocal proponent of an open source-compatible J2EE is JBoss founder Marc Fleury, who fears that opening up J2EE may happen too late. "We need the whole of J2EE to be compatible [with open source], and w